Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cosentino, Alejandro César
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Azzara, Sergio Héctor, Grinhauz, Aldana Sol, Azzollini, Susana Celeste
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1707
Resumo: It has been proposed that urgent decision making in extreme circumstances may be based on two systems of information processing: affective and rational (Cosentino, Azzollini, Depaula, & Castillo, 2017). Given that the model of urgent decisions has been recently developed, the aim of this study was to determine its characteristics and relationships with relevant variables: (a) the tendency to inhibit dominant but incorrect responses and to promote a reflective process that leads to the correct responses and (b) the resolution and difficulty of high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. We used an intentional sample of 416 university students from a military academy. The results showed that urgent decision making in extreme circumstances is related to general preferences for intuition or deliberation, cognitive reflection, and reaction to high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. Notably, urgent decision making based on rationality was positively associated with cognitive reflection and a utilitarian way of solving high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. Also, both rational and affective/emotional urgent decision-making types were found to be associated with the perceived difficulty in solving the dilemmas. The model of urgent judgments in extreme circumstances can be useful because it contributes to describing the optimal cognitive and decisional profile for the selection of human resources in activities that involve facing contexts of high uncertainty where fast decision making is required, such as tasks performed by professional rescue or combat personnel.
id RCAP_4d64c5eaf6ea8ca65936681ed97098e6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/1707
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmasA tomada de decisões urgentes em circunstâncias extremas: Associações com a reflexão cognitiva e com respostas a dilemas moraisDecision making, Decision theory, Rationality, Affection, Military academy.Tomada de decisão, Teoria da decisão, Racionalidade, Afetividade, Academia militar.It has been proposed that urgent decision making in extreme circumstances may be based on two systems of information processing: affective and rational (Cosentino, Azzollini, Depaula, & Castillo, 2017). Given that the model of urgent decisions has been recently developed, the aim of this study was to determine its characteristics and relationships with relevant variables: (a) the tendency to inhibit dominant but incorrect responses and to promote a reflective process that leads to the correct responses and (b) the resolution and difficulty of high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. We used an intentional sample of 416 university students from a military academy. The results showed that urgent decision making in extreme circumstances is related to general preferences for intuition or deliberation, cognitive reflection, and reaction to high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. Notably, urgent decision making based on rationality was positively associated with cognitive reflection and a utilitarian way of solving high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. Also, both rational and affective/emotional urgent decision-making types were found to be associated with the perceived difficulty in solving the dilemmas. The model of urgent judgments in extreme circumstances can be useful because it contributes to describing the optimal cognitive and decisional profile for the selection of human resources in activities that involve facing contexts of high uncertainty where fast decision making is required, such as tasks performed by professional rescue or combat personnel.Foi proposto que a tomada de decisões urgentes em circunstâncias extremas pode ser baseada em dois tipos de processamento de informações: afetivo e racional. Como o modelo de decisões urgentes é recente, o objetivo deste estudo foi determinar suas características e relações com variáveis relevantes. Utilizamos uma amostra intencional de 416 estudantes universitários de uma academia militar. Os resultados mostraram que a tomada de decisões urgentes em circunstâncias extremas está relacionada a preferências gerais por intuição ou deliberação, reflexão cognitiva e reação a dilemas morais pessoal altamente conflituosos. Notavelmente, a tomada de decisão urgente baseada na racionalidade foi positivamente associada à reflexão cognitiva e a uma forma utilitária de resolver dilemas morais pessoais de alto conflito. Além disso, tanto a tomada de decisões urgentes, tanto racionais como afetivas/emocionais, foram associadas à percepção da dificuldade em resolver dilemas morais pessoais de alto-conflito. O modelo de juízos urgentes em circunstâncias extremas pode ser útil porque contribui para descrever o perfil cognitivo e decisório óptimo para a seleção de recursos humanos em atividades que envolvem enfrentar contextos de alta incerteza onde a tomada de decisões rápidas é necessária, tais como tarefas realizadas por profissionais de resgate ou pessoal de combate.ISPA - Instituto Universitário2020-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1707https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1707Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 1 (2020); 65-74Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 1 (2020); 65-741646-60200870-8231reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1707http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1707/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosentino, Alejandro CésarAzzara, Sergio HéctorGrinhauz, Aldana SolAzzollini, Susana Celeste2023-05-11T10:19:41Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1707Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:51:10.615091Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
A tomada de decisões urgentes em circunstâncias extremas: Associações com a reflexão cognitiva e com respostas a dilemas morais
title Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
spellingShingle Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
Cosentino, Alejandro César
Decision making, Decision theory, Rationality, Affection, Military academy.
Tomada de decisão, Teoria da decisão, Racionalidade, Afetividade, Academia militar.
title_short Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
title_full Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
title_fullStr Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
title_full_unstemmed Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
title_sort Urgent decision-making in extreme circumstances: Associations with cognitive reflection and with responses to moral dilemmas
author Cosentino, Alejandro César
author_facet Cosentino, Alejandro César
Azzara, Sergio Héctor
Grinhauz, Aldana Sol
Azzollini, Susana Celeste
author_role author
author2 Azzara, Sergio Héctor
Grinhauz, Aldana Sol
Azzollini, Susana Celeste
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cosentino, Alejandro César
Azzara, Sergio Héctor
Grinhauz, Aldana Sol
Azzollini, Susana Celeste
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Decision making, Decision theory, Rationality, Affection, Military academy.
Tomada de decisão, Teoria da decisão, Racionalidade, Afetividade, Academia militar.
topic Decision making, Decision theory, Rationality, Affection, Military academy.
Tomada de decisão, Teoria da decisão, Racionalidade, Afetividade, Academia militar.
description It has been proposed that urgent decision making in extreme circumstances may be based on two systems of information processing: affective and rational (Cosentino, Azzollini, Depaula, & Castillo, 2017). Given that the model of urgent decisions has been recently developed, the aim of this study was to determine its characteristics and relationships with relevant variables: (a) the tendency to inhibit dominant but incorrect responses and to promote a reflective process that leads to the correct responses and (b) the resolution and difficulty of high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. We used an intentional sample of 416 university students from a military academy. The results showed that urgent decision making in extreme circumstances is related to general preferences for intuition or deliberation, cognitive reflection, and reaction to high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. Notably, urgent decision making based on rationality was positively associated with cognitive reflection and a utilitarian way of solving high-conflict personal moral dilemmas. Also, both rational and affective/emotional urgent decision-making types were found to be associated with the perceived difficulty in solving the dilemmas. The model of urgent judgments in extreme circumstances can be useful because it contributes to describing the optimal cognitive and decisional profile for the selection of human resources in activities that involve facing contexts of high uncertainty where fast decision making is required, such as tasks performed by professional rescue or combat personnel.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1707
https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1707
url https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1707
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1707
http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1707/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Universitário
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Universitário
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 1 (2020); 65-74
Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 1 (2020); 65-74
1646-6020
0870-8231
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131590284017664