When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carter, Elisabeth
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/2447
Resumo: Using UK police interviews as data, this empirical work seeks to explore and explain the interactional phenomena that accompany, distinguish, and are drawn upon by suspects in performing deceptive talk. It explores the effects of the myriad and often conflicting interactional requirements of turntaking, preference organisation and conversational maxims on the suspect’s talk, alongside the practical interactional choices of a suspect attempting to avoid revealing his guilt. This paper reveals a close link between the oXcer’s and suspect’s interaction and the patterned organisation of an assortment of divergent utterances produced in response to probing questions that follow a lie. The Vndings expose a hierarchical interactional order that explains the diverse and conWicting accounts of cues to deception in this Veld, suggesting that interactional phenomena are systematically enlisted in the orientating to, and the violation of interactional organisation which enables the suspect to produce utterances that protect his position, and can also be directed towards the performance of wider objectives such as reinforcing a claim of innocence or supporting a version of events.
id RCAP_4f925e5a2d41148d95ab7a478f2660c3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2447
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interviewArtigos/ArticlesUsing UK police interviews as data, this empirical work seeks to explore and explain the interactional phenomena that accompany, distinguish, and are drawn upon by suspects in performing deceptive talk. It explores the effects of the myriad and often conflicting interactional requirements of turntaking, preference organisation and conversational maxims on the suspect’s talk, alongside the practical interactional choices of a suspect attempting to avoid revealing his guilt. This paper reveals a close link between the oXcer’s and suspect’s interaction and the patterned organisation of an assortment of divergent utterances produced in response to probing questions that follow a lie. The Vndings expose a hierarchical interactional order that explains the diverse and conWicting accounts of cues to deception in this Veld, suggesting that interactional phenomena are systematically enlisted in the orientating to, and the violation of interactional organisation which enables the suspect to produce utterances that protect his position, and can also be directed towards the performance of wider objectives such as reinforcing a claim of innocence or supporting a version of events.Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto2017-05-30T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/2447por2183-3745Carter, Elisabethinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-21T15:48:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2447Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:56:36.956829Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
title When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
spellingShingle When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
Carter, Elisabeth
Artigos/Articles
title_short When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
title_full When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
title_fullStr When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
title_full_unstemmed When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
title_sort When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent : Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview
author Carter, Elisabeth
author_facet Carter, Elisabeth
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carter, Elisabeth
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artigos/Articles
topic Artigos/Articles
description Using UK police interviews as data, this empirical work seeks to explore and explain the interactional phenomena that accompany, distinguish, and are drawn upon by suspects in performing deceptive talk. It explores the effects of the myriad and often conflicting interactional requirements of turntaking, preference organisation and conversational maxims on the suspect’s talk, alongside the practical interactional choices of a suspect attempting to avoid revealing his guilt. This paper reveals a close link between the oXcer’s and suspect’s interaction and the patterned organisation of an assortment of divergent utterances produced in response to probing questions that follow a lie. The Vndings expose a hierarchical interactional order that explains the diverse and conWicting accounts of cues to deception in this Veld, suggesting that interactional phenomena are systematically enlisted in the orientating to, and the violation of interactional organisation which enables the suspect to produce utterances that protect his position, and can also be directed towards the performance of wider objectives such as reinforcing a claim of innocence or supporting a version of events.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-30T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/2447
url https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/2447
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-3745
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130434979758080