Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23907 |
Resumo: | Wirecard AG, a forward-thinking corporation that aimed to reshape the payment industry, declared bankruptcy in June 2020. The company reported missing a total of EUR 1.9 billion, assuming they had probably never existed. This incident harmed the credibility of the German’s financial regulator and the reputation of the external auditors. Wirecard’s Annual Reports and other sources, such as the Financial Times newspaper, were examined in light of the thirty-seven red flags identified in Murcia and Borba’s (2007) study, which was supported on the International Standard Auditing (ISA) 240, to determine whether the red flags included in this standard were sufficient to indicate potential Financial Statement fraud in the Wirecard case. Twenty-four of the thirty-seven red flags examined sign potential fraud. Nineteen of these red flags are included in ISA 240, leading to the conclusion that the red flags present in that standard were sufficient to indicate potential Financial Statement fraud in the Wirecard case, and any outsider analyst could have detected and incorporated these early warning alarms into their decision-making. This also makes clear that auditors neglected the red flags signalization in the Wirecard case. Although ISA 240 proved to be effective, five of the twenty-four red flags were absent in this standard. These red flags are significant since they expose business issues, implying that a modification of ISA 240 to integrate similar essential red flags is required to make this standard more effective. Moreover, the Wirecard case raised six new significant red flags that can be incorporated in ISA 240. |
id |
RCAP_50aeb071ea7ea452dba8a9b7dda07551 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23907 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud caseWirecardFraudeBandeiras VermelhasAuditRed flagsAuditoria -- AuditWirecard AG, a forward-thinking corporation that aimed to reshape the payment industry, declared bankruptcy in June 2020. The company reported missing a total of EUR 1.9 billion, assuming they had probably never existed. This incident harmed the credibility of the German’s financial regulator and the reputation of the external auditors. Wirecard’s Annual Reports and other sources, such as the Financial Times newspaper, were examined in light of the thirty-seven red flags identified in Murcia and Borba’s (2007) study, which was supported on the International Standard Auditing (ISA) 240, to determine whether the red flags included in this standard were sufficient to indicate potential Financial Statement fraud in the Wirecard case. Twenty-four of the thirty-seven red flags examined sign potential fraud. Nineteen of these red flags are included in ISA 240, leading to the conclusion that the red flags present in that standard were sufficient to indicate potential Financial Statement fraud in the Wirecard case, and any outsider analyst could have detected and incorporated these early warning alarms into their decision-making. This also makes clear that auditors neglected the red flags signalization in the Wirecard case. Although ISA 240 proved to be effective, five of the twenty-four red flags were absent in this standard. These red flags are significant since they expose business issues, implying that a modification of ISA 240 to integrate similar essential red flags is required to make this standard more effective. Moreover, the Wirecard case raised six new significant red flags that can be incorporated in ISA 240.Wirecard AG, uma empresa inovadora que prometeu revolucionar a indústria de pagamentos, declarou falência em junho de 2020. A empresa deu como desaparecido um total de 1,9 biliões de euros, assumindo que provavelmente estes nunca tinham existido. Este incidente prejudicou a credibilidade da entidade reguladora alemã e a reputação dos auditores externos. Relatórios Anuais da Wirecard e outras fontes, como o jornal Financial Times, foram analisadas à luz de trinta e sete bandeiras vermelhas identificadas no estudo de Múrcia e Borba (2007), apoiado pela International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 240, para determinar se as bandeiras vermelhas presentes nesta norma eram suficientes para indicar potencial fraude nas Demonstrações Financeiras no caso Wirecard. Vinte e quatro das trinta e sete bandeiras vermelhas examinadas sugerem potencial fraude. Dezanove destas bandeiras vermelhas estão incluídas na ISA 240, permitindo concluir que as bandeiras vermelhas presentes nesta norma eram suficientes para indicar potencial fraude nas Demonstrações Financeiras no caso Wirecard, e qualquer analista externo à empresa poderia ter detetado e incorporado estes sinais prévios na sua tomada de decisão. Esta informação também evidencia que os auditores negligenciaram a sinalização das bandeiras vermelhas. Embora a ISA 240 tenha provado ser eficaz, cinco das vinte e quatro bandeiras vermelhas estavam ausentes nesta norma. Estas bandeiras vermelhas são significativas, pois expõem problemas nas empresas, implicando que uma modificação na ISA 240 para integrar bandeiras vermelhas essenciais similares é necessária de forma a torna-la mais eficaz. Adicionalmente, o caso Wirecard revelou seis novas bandeiras vermelhas significativas que podem ser incorporadas na ISA 240.2022-01-04T15:55:01Z2021-12-09T00:00:00Z2021-12-092021-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/23907TID:202815196engTeixeira, Sara Filipa Davidinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:56:16Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23907Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:28:48.930483Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case |
title |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case |
spellingShingle |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case Teixeira, Sara Filipa David Wirecard Fraude Bandeiras Vermelhas Audit Red flags Auditoria -- Audit |
title_short |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case |
title_full |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case |
title_fullStr |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case |
title_full_unstemmed |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case |
title_sort |
Red flags for financial fraud: uncovering the wirecard fraud case |
author |
Teixeira, Sara Filipa David |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Sara Filipa David |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Sara Filipa David |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Wirecard Fraude Bandeiras Vermelhas Audit Red flags Auditoria -- Audit |
topic |
Wirecard Fraude Bandeiras Vermelhas Audit Red flags Auditoria -- Audit |
description |
Wirecard AG, a forward-thinking corporation that aimed to reshape the payment industry, declared bankruptcy in June 2020. The company reported missing a total of EUR 1.9 billion, assuming they had probably never existed. This incident harmed the credibility of the German’s financial regulator and the reputation of the external auditors. Wirecard’s Annual Reports and other sources, such as the Financial Times newspaper, were examined in light of the thirty-seven red flags identified in Murcia and Borba’s (2007) study, which was supported on the International Standard Auditing (ISA) 240, to determine whether the red flags included in this standard were sufficient to indicate potential Financial Statement fraud in the Wirecard case. Twenty-four of the thirty-seven red flags examined sign potential fraud. Nineteen of these red flags are included in ISA 240, leading to the conclusion that the red flags present in that standard were sufficient to indicate potential Financial Statement fraud in the Wirecard case, and any outsider analyst could have detected and incorporated these early warning alarms into their decision-making. This also makes clear that auditors neglected the red flags signalization in the Wirecard case. Although ISA 240 proved to be effective, five of the twenty-four red flags were absent in this standard. These red flags are significant since they expose business issues, implying that a modification of ISA 240 to integrate similar essential red flags is required to make this standard more effective. Moreover, the Wirecard case raised six new significant red flags that can be incorporated in ISA 240. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-09T00:00:00Z 2021-12-09 2021-10 2022-01-04T15:55:01Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23907 TID:202815196 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23907 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202815196 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134850507079680 |