Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Hugo
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Santos, Alexandra M, Pinto, Daniela, Medeiros, Rui
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335
Resumo: The interaction between HPV E6 and p53 protein is known as the most important event in HPV-associated carcinogenesis. Some in vitro studies suggested that p53 genetic variants are targeted for ubiquitin-proteasome degradation induced by E6 with different abilities. A common p53 variant at position 72 (R72P) has leaded to the development of several studies regarding its role on cervical cancer development. However, only few reports have shown an association between the Arginine (R) variant at position 52 of p53 and increased susceptibility to HPV E6 mediated degradation and thus to increased cancer susceptibility. We revised the literature in order to obtain plausible data to discuss about these evidences for cervical cancer susceptibility. The more recent studies, including meta-analysis reviews, point out that there is no association of this p53 variant and cervical cancer development. This variant seems to be differently segregated in different ethnic/geographical locations; therefore, there might be a possible role of this genetic variant associated with a certain genetic background, which can explain why some studies reveal increased risk of cervical cancer development associated with Arginine p53 variant.
id RCAP_538db9ee0e522a0a2124a9f7b6ce01ee
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/335
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?The interaction between HPV E6 and p53 protein is known as the most important event in HPV-associated carcinogenesis. Some in vitro studies suggested that p53 genetic variants are targeted for ubiquitin-proteasome degradation induced by E6 with different abilities. A common p53 variant at position 72 (R72P) has leaded to the development of several studies regarding its role on cervical cancer development. However, only few reports have shown an association between the Arginine (R) variant at position 52 of p53 and increased susceptibility to HPV E6 mediated degradation and thus to increased cancer susceptibility. We revised the literature in order to obtain plausible data to discuss about these evidences for cervical cancer susceptibility. The more recent studies, including meta-analysis reviews, point out that there is no association of this p53 variant and cervical cancer development. This variant seems to be differently segregated in different ethnic/geographical locations; therefore, there might be a possible role of this genetic variant associated with a certain genetic background, which can explain why some studies reveal increased risk of cervical cancer development associated with Arginine p53 variant.The interaction between HPV E6 and p53 protein is known as the most important event in HPV-associated carcinogenesis. Some in vitro studies suggested that p53 genetic variants are targeted for ubiquitin-proteasome degradation induced by E6 with different abilities. A common p53 variant at position 72 (R72P) has leaded to the development of several studies regarding its role on cervical cancer development. However, only few reports have shown an association between the Arginine (R) variant at position 52 of p53 and increased susceptibility to HPV E6 mediated degradation and thus to increased cancer susceptibility. We revised the literature in order to obtain plausible data to discuss about these evidences for cervical cancer susceptibility. The more recent studies, including meta-analysis reviews, point out that there is no association of this p53 variant and cervical cancer development. This variant seems to be differently segregated in different ethnic/geographical locations; therefore, there might be a possible role of this genetic variant associated with a certain genetic background, which can explain why some studies reveal increased risk of cervical cancer development associated with Arginine p53 variant.Ordem dos Médicos2011-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/335Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2011): January-February; 127-134Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 N.º 1 (2011): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 127-1341646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335/105Sousa, HugoSantos, Alexandra MPinto, DanielaMedeiros, Ruiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:56:06Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/335Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:16:28.826248Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
title Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
spellingShingle Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
Sousa, Hugo
title_short Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
title_full Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
title_fullStr Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
title_sort Is there a biological plausability for p53 codon 72 polymorphism influence on cervical cancer development?
author Sousa, Hugo
author_facet Sousa, Hugo
Santos, Alexandra M
Pinto, Daniela
Medeiros, Rui
author_role author
author2 Santos, Alexandra M
Pinto, Daniela
Medeiros, Rui
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Hugo
Santos, Alexandra M
Pinto, Daniela
Medeiros, Rui
description The interaction between HPV E6 and p53 protein is known as the most important event in HPV-associated carcinogenesis. Some in vitro studies suggested that p53 genetic variants are targeted for ubiquitin-proteasome degradation induced by E6 with different abilities. A common p53 variant at position 72 (R72P) has leaded to the development of several studies regarding its role on cervical cancer development. However, only few reports have shown an association between the Arginine (R) variant at position 52 of p53 and increased susceptibility to HPV E6 mediated degradation and thus to increased cancer susceptibility. We revised the literature in order to obtain plausible data to discuss about these evidences for cervical cancer susceptibility. The more recent studies, including meta-analysis reviews, point out that there is no association of this p53 variant and cervical cancer development. This variant seems to be differently segregated in different ethnic/geographical locations; therefore, there might be a possible role of this genetic variant associated with a certain genetic background, which can explain why some studies reveal increased risk of cervical cancer development associated with Arginine p53 variant.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-02-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/335
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/335
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/335/105
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2011): January-February; 127-134
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 24 N.º 1 (2011): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 127-134
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130618512015360