Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723 |
Resumo: | Exposure to pesticides is a major public health concern, because of the widespread distribution of these compounds and their possible long term effects. Recently, organic farming has been introduced as a consumer and environmental friendly agricultural system, although little is known about the effects on workers' health. The aim of this work was to evaluate genetic damage and immunological alterations in workers of both traditional and organic farming. Eighty-five farmers exposed to several pesticides, thirty-six organic farmers and sixty-one controls took part in the study. Biomarkers of exposure (pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, and thioethers in urine and butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma), early effect (micronuclei in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, T-cell receptor mutation assay, chromosomal aberrations, comet assay and lymphocytes subpopulations) and susceptibility (genetic polymorphisms related to metabolism - EPHX1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 - and DNA repair-XRCC1 and XRCC2) were evaluated. When compared to controls and organic farmers, pesticide farmers presented a significant increase of micronuclei in lymphocytes (frequency ratio, FR=2.80) and reticulocytes (FR=1.89), chromosomal aberrations (FR=2.19), DNA damage assessed by comet assay (mean ratio, MR=1.71), and a significant decrease in the proportion of B lymphocytes (MR=0.88). Results were not consistent for organic farmers when compared to controls, with a 48% increase of micronuclei in lumphocytes frequency (p=0.016) contrasted by the significant decreases of TCR-Mf (p=0.001) and %T (p=0.001). Our data confirm the increased presence of DNA damage in farmers exposed to pesticides, and show as exposure conditions may influence observed effects. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the small size of the sample and the unbalanced distribution of individuals in the three study groups. |
id |
RCAP_539ead882be3e9b8f476a66d927fc260 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/2723 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farmingOccupational HealthDNA damageBiomarkersGenotoxicityImmunotoxicityOrganic FarmingPesticidesGenotoxidade Ambiental e OcupacionalAr e Saúde OcupacionalExposure to pesticides is a major public health concern, because of the widespread distribution of these compounds and their possible long term effects. Recently, organic farming has been introduced as a consumer and environmental friendly agricultural system, although little is known about the effects on workers' health. The aim of this work was to evaluate genetic damage and immunological alterations in workers of both traditional and organic farming. Eighty-five farmers exposed to several pesticides, thirty-six organic farmers and sixty-one controls took part in the study. Biomarkers of exposure (pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, and thioethers in urine and butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma), early effect (micronuclei in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, T-cell receptor mutation assay, chromosomal aberrations, comet assay and lymphocytes subpopulations) and susceptibility (genetic polymorphisms related to metabolism - EPHX1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 - and DNA repair-XRCC1 and XRCC2) were evaluated. When compared to controls and organic farmers, pesticide farmers presented a significant increase of micronuclei in lymphocytes (frequency ratio, FR=2.80) and reticulocytes (FR=1.89), chromosomal aberrations (FR=2.19), DNA damage assessed by comet assay (mean ratio, MR=1.71), and a significant decrease in the proportion of B lymphocytes (MR=0.88). Results were not consistent for organic farmers when compared to controls, with a 48% increase of micronuclei in lumphocytes frequency (p=0.016) contrasted by the significant decreases of TCR-Mf (p=0.001) and %T (p=0.001). Our data confirm the increased presence of DNA damage in farmers exposed to pesticides, and show as exposure conditions may influence observed effects. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the small size of the sample and the unbalanced distribution of individuals in the three study groups.This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the grant SFRH/BD/37190/2007. The work of F.M., V.D., and S.B. was supported by grants funded by the Associazione Itaiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC).Elsevier/EUROTOXRepositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de SaúdeCosta, C.García-Lestón, J.Costa, S.Coelho, P.Silva, S.Pingarilho, M.Valdiglesias, V.Mattei, F.Dall'Armi, V.Bonassi, S.Laffon, B.Snawder, J.Teixeira, João Paulo2015-01-30T12:53:51Z2014-10-152014-10-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723engToxicol Lett. 2014 Oct 15;230(2):166-76. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 240378-427410.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-20T15:39:24Zoai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/2723Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:37:39.394202Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming |
title |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming |
spellingShingle |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming Costa, C. Occupational Health DNA damage Biomarkers Genotoxicity Immunotoxicity Organic Farming Pesticides Genotoxidade Ambiental e Ocupacional Ar e Saúde Ocupacional |
title_short |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming |
title_full |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming |
title_fullStr |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming |
title_sort |
Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming |
author |
Costa, C. |
author_facet |
Costa, C. García-Lestón, J. Costa, S. Coelho, P. Silva, S. Pingarilho, M. Valdiglesias, V. Mattei, F. Dall'Armi, V. Bonassi, S. Laffon, B. Snawder, J. Teixeira, João Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
García-Lestón, J. Costa, S. Coelho, P. Silva, S. Pingarilho, M. Valdiglesias, V. Mattei, F. Dall'Armi, V. Bonassi, S. Laffon, B. Snawder, J. Teixeira, João Paulo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de Saúde |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, C. García-Lestón, J. Costa, S. Coelho, P. Silva, S. Pingarilho, M. Valdiglesias, V. Mattei, F. Dall'Armi, V. Bonassi, S. Laffon, B. Snawder, J. Teixeira, João Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Occupational Health DNA damage Biomarkers Genotoxicity Immunotoxicity Organic Farming Pesticides Genotoxidade Ambiental e Ocupacional Ar e Saúde Ocupacional |
topic |
Occupational Health DNA damage Biomarkers Genotoxicity Immunotoxicity Organic Farming Pesticides Genotoxidade Ambiental e Ocupacional Ar e Saúde Ocupacional |
description |
Exposure to pesticides is a major public health concern, because of the widespread distribution of these compounds and their possible long term effects. Recently, organic farming has been introduced as a consumer and environmental friendly agricultural system, although little is known about the effects on workers' health. The aim of this work was to evaluate genetic damage and immunological alterations in workers of both traditional and organic farming. Eighty-five farmers exposed to several pesticides, thirty-six organic farmers and sixty-one controls took part in the study. Biomarkers of exposure (pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, and thioethers in urine and butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma), early effect (micronuclei in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, T-cell receptor mutation assay, chromosomal aberrations, comet assay and lymphocytes subpopulations) and susceptibility (genetic polymorphisms related to metabolism - EPHX1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 - and DNA repair-XRCC1 and XRCC2) were evaluated. When compared to controls and organic farmers, pesticide farmers presented a significant increase of micronuclei in lymphocytes (frequency ratio, FR=2.80) and reticulocytes (FR=1.89), chromosomal aberrations (FR=2.19), DNA damage assessed by comet assay (mean ratio, MR=1.71), and a significant decrease in the proportion of B lymphocytes (MR=0.88). Results were not consistent for organic farmers when compared to controls, with a 48% increase of micronuclei in lumphocytes frequency (p=0.016) contrasted by the significant decreases of TCR-Mf (p=0.001) and %T (p=0.001). Our data confirm the increased presence of DNA damage in farmers exposed to pesticides, and show as exposure conditions may influence observed effects. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the small size of the sample and the unbalanced distribution of individuals in the three study groups. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-10-15 2014-10-15T00:00:00Z 2015-01-30T12:53:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Toxicol Lett. 2014 Oct 15;230(2):166-76. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 24 0378-4274 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier/EUROTOX |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier/EUROTOX |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132112437116928 |