Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, C.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: García-Lestón, J., Costa, S., Coelho, P., Silva, S., Pingarilho, M., Valdiglesias, V., Mattei, F., Dall'Armi, V., Bonassi, S., Laffon, B., Snawder, J., Teixeira, João Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723
Resumo: Exposure to pesticides is a major public health concern, because of the widespread distribution of these compounds and their possible long term effects. Recently, organic farming has been introduced as a consumer and environmental friendly agricultural system, although little is known about the effects on workers' health. The aim of this work was to evaluate genetic damage and immunological alterations in workers of both traditional and organic farming. Eighty-five farmers exposed to several pesticides, thirty-six organic farmers and sixty-one controls took part in the study. Biomarkers of exposure (pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, and thioethers in urine and butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma), early effect (micronuclei in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, T-cell receptor mutation assay, chromosomal aberrations, comet assay and lymphocytes subpopulations) and susceptibility (genetic polymorphisms related to metabolism - EPHX1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 - and DNA repair-XRCC1 and XRCC2) were evaluated. When compared to controls and organic farmers, pesticide farmers presented a significant increase of micronuclei in lymphocytes (frequency ratio, FR=2.80) and reticulocytes (FR=1.89), chromosomal aberrations (FR=2.19), DNA damage assessed by comet assay (mean ratio, MR=1.71), and a significant decrease in the proportion of B lymphocytes (MR=0.88). Results were not consistent for organic farmers when compared to controls, with a 48% increase of micronuclei in lumphocytes frequency (p=0.016) contrasted by the significant decreases of TCR-Mf (p=0.001) and %T (p=0.001). Our data confirm the increased presence of DNA damage in farmers exposed to pesticides, and show as exposure conditions may influence observed effects. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the small size of the sample and the unbalanced distribution of individuals in the three study groups.
id RCAP_539ead882be3e9b8f476a66d927fc260
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/2723
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farmingOccupational HealthDNA damageBiomarkersGenotoxicityImmunotoxicityOrganic FarmingPesticidesGenotoxidade Ambiental e OcupacionalAr e Saúde OcupacionalExposure to pesticides is a major public health concern, because of the widespread distribution of these compounds and their possible long term effects. Recently, organic farming has been introduced as a consumer and environmental friendly agricultural system, although little is known about the effects on workers' health. The aim of this work was to evaluate genetic damage and immunological alterations in workers of both traditional and organic farming. Eighty-five farmers exposed to several pesticides, thirty-six organic farmers and sixty-one controls took part in the study. Biomarkers of exposure (pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, and thioethers in urine and butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma), early effect (micronuclei in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, T-cell receptor mutation assay, chromosomal aberrations, comet assay and lymphocytes subpopulations) and susceptibility (genetic polymorphisms related to metabolism - EPHX1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 - and DNA repair-XRCC1 and XRCC2) were evaluated. When compared to controls and organic farmers, pesticide farmers presented a significant increase of micronuclei in lymphocytes (frequency ratio, FR=2.80) and reticulocytes (FR=1.89), chromosomal aberrations (FR=2.19), DNA damage assessed by comet assay (mean ratio, MR=1.71), and a significant decrease in the proportion of B lymphocytes (MR=0.88). Results were not consistent for organic farmers when compared to controls, with a 48% increase of micronuclei in lumphocytes frequency (p=0.016) contrasted by the significant decreases of TCR-Mf (p=0.001) and %T (p=0.001). Our data confirm the increased presence of DNA damage in farmers exposed to pesticides, and show as exposure conditions may influence observed effects. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the small size of the sample and the unbalanced distribution of individuals in the three study groups.This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the grant SFRH/BD/37190/2007. The work of F.M., V.D., and S.B. was supported by grants funded by the Associazione Itaiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC).Elsevier/EUROTOXRepositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de SaúdeCosta, C.García-Lestón, J.Costa, S.Coelho, P.Silva, S.Pingarilho, M.Valdiglesias, V.Mattei, F.Dall'Armi, V.Bonassi, S.Laffon, B.Snawder, J.Teixeira, João Paulo2015-01-30T12:53:51Z2014-10-152014-10-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723engToxicol Lett. 2014 Oct 15;230(2):166-76. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 240378-427410.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-20T15:39:24Zoai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/2723Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:37:39.394202Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
title Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
spellingShingle Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
Costa, C.
Occupational Health
DNA damage
Biomarkers
Genotoxicity
Immunotoxicity
Organic Farming
Pesticides
Genotoxidade Ambiental e Ocupacional
Ar e Saúde Ocupacional
title_short Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
title_full Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
title_fullStr Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
title_full_unstemmed Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
title_sort Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming
author Costa, C.
author_facet Costa, C.
García-Lestón, J.
Costa, S.
Coelho, P.
Silva, S.
Pingarilho, M.
Valdiglesias, V.
Mattei, F.
Dall'Armi, V.
Bonassi, S.
Laffon, B.
Snawder, J.
Teixeira, João Paulo
author_role author
author2 García-Lestón, J.
Costa, S.
Coelho, P.
Silva, S.
Pingarilho, M.
Valdiglesias, V.
Mattei, F.
Dall'Armi, V.
Bonassi, S.
Laffon, B.
Snawder, J.
Teixeira, João Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de Saúde
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, C.
García-Lestón, J.
Costa, S.
Coelho, P.
Silva, S.
Pingarilho, M.
Valdiglesias, V.
Mattei, F.
Dall'Armi, V.
Bonassi, S.
Laffon, B.
Snawder, J.
Teixeira, João Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Occupational Health
DNA damage
Biomarkers
Genotoxicity
Immunotoxicity
Organic Farming
Pesticides
Genotoxidade Ambiental e Ocupacional
Ar e Saúde Ocupacional
topic Occupational Health
DNA damage
Biomarkers
Genotoxicity
Immunotoxicity
Organic Farming
Pesticides
Genotoxidade Ambiental e Ocupacional
Ar e Saúde Ocupacional
description Exposure to pesticides is a major public health concern, because of the widespread distribution of these compounds and their possible long term effects. Recently, organic farming has been introduced as a consumer and environmental friendly agricultural system, although little is known about the effects on workers' health. The aim of this work was to evaluate genetic damage and immunological alterations in workers of both traditional and organic farming. Eighty-five farmers exposed to several pesticides, thirty-six organic farmers and sixty-one controls took part in the study. Biomarkers of exposure (pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, and thioethers in urine and butyrylcholinesterase activity in plasma), early effect (micronuclei in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, T-cell receptor mutation assay, chromosomal aberrations, comet assay and lymphocytes subpopulations) and susceptibility (genetic polymorphisms related to metabolism - EPHX1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 - and DNA repair-XRCC1 and XRCC2) were evaluated. When compared to controls and organic farmers, pesticide farmers presented a significant increase of micronuclei in lymphocytes (frequency ratio, FR=2.80) and reticulocytes (FR=1.89), chromosomal aberrations (FR=2.19), DNA damage assessed by comet assay (mean ratio, MR=1.71), and a significant decrease in the proportion of B lymphocytes (MR=0.88). Results were not consistent for organic farmers when compared to controls, with a 48% increase of micronuclei in lumphocytes frequency (p=0.016) contrasted by the significant decreases of TCR-Mf (p=0.001) and %T (p=0.001). Our data confirm the increased presence of DNA damage in farmers exposed to pesticides, and show as exposure conditions may influence observed effects. These results must be interpreted with caution due to the small size of the sample and the unbalanced distribution of individuals in the three study groups.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-15
2014-10-15T00:00:00Z
2015-01-30T12:53:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/2723
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Toxicol Lett. 2014 Oct 15;230(2):166-76. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 24
0378-4274
10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier/EUROTOX
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier/EUROTOX
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132112437116928