The use of poison pills by US firms over the period 1997-2015

• Autor(a) principal: Ferraz, Duarte Pitta
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Outros Autores: Lopes, Ilídio Tomás, Hitzelberger, Simon
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• DOI: 10.1504/IJBEX.2019.099450
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2019.099450
• topic: Antitakeover statute; Corporate governance; Hostile takeover; Poison pills; Shareholder wealth; Value creation; Business and International Management; Strategy and Management

Poison pills are controversial devices for which no common conclusion as to how the market reacts to their adoption exists. This research collates 4,479 poison pill adoption events by US companies over the period 1997-2015. Statistically significant insights and positive abnormal returns were found on the day the poison pill was adopted. It is for this reason that we argue in favour of the shareholder wealth-maximisation hypothesis, stating that poison pills protect shareholders by providing management a superior bargaining position. The shareholders react positively to poison pill adoption, particularly if a hostile takeover attempt is anticipated. Furthermore, shareholders seem to value the protective effect of the device, which both provides management a superior bargaining position and allows the maximal possible bid premium to be negotiated.