Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948 |
Resumo: | Homophily, the tendency of people to have ties with those who are similar, is a fundamental pattern to understand human relations. As such, the study of homophily can provide key insights into the flow of information and behaviors within political contexts. Indeed, some degree of polarization is necessary for the functioning of liberal democracies, but too much polarization can increase the adoption of extreme political positions and create democratic gridlock. The relationship between homophilous communication ties and political polarization is thus fundamental because it affects a pillar of democratic regimes: the need for public debate where divergent ideas and interests can be confronted. This research compares the degree of homophily and political polarization in Catalan MPs’ Twitter mentions network to Dutch MPs’ Twitter mentions network. Exponential random graph models were employed on a one-year sample of mentions among Dutch MPs (N = 7,356) and on a one-year, three-month sample of mentions among Catalan MPs (N = 19,507). Party polarization was measured by calculating the external–internal index of both Twitter mentions networks. Results reveal that the mentions among Catalan MPs are much more homophilous than those among the Dutch MPs. Indeed, there is a positive relationship between the degree of MPs’ homophilous communication ties and the degree of political polarization observed in each network. |
id |
RCAP_690791cfa31f03ee00ec3b5fe76e4654 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysishomophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; TwitterHomophily, the tendency of people to have ties with those who are similar, is a fundamental pattern to understand human relations. As such, the study of homophily can provide key insights into the flow of information and behaviors within political contexts. Indeed, some degree of polarization is necessary for the functioning of liberal democracies, but too much polarization can increase the adoption of extreme political positions and create democratic gridlock. The relationship between homophilous communication ties and political polarization is thus fundamental because it affects a pillar of democratic regimes: the need for public debate where divergent ideas and interests can be confronted. This research compares the degree of homophily and political polarization in Catalan MPs’ Twitter mentions network to Dutch MPs’ Twitter mentions network. Exponential random graph models were employed on a one-year sample of mentions among Dutch MPs (N = 7,356) and on a one-year, three-month sample of mentions among Catalan MPs (N = 19,507). Party polarization was measured by calculating the external–internal index of both Twitter mentions networks. Results reveal that the mentions among Catalan MPs are much more homophilous than those among the Dutch MPs. Indeed, there is a positive relationship between the degree of MPs’ homophilous communication ties and the degree of political polarization observed in each network.Cogitatio2022-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Networks and Organizing Processes in Online Social Media; 81-922183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948/4948Copyright (c) 2022 Marc Esteve-Del-Valleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsteve-Del-Valle, Marc2022-12-20T10:57:57Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:36.203284Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis |
title |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc homophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; Twitter |
title_short |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis |
title_full |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis |
title_sort |
Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis |
author |
Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc |
author_facet |
Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
homophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; Twitter |
topic |
homophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; Twitter |
description |
Homophily, the tendency of people to have ties with those who are similar, is a fundamental pattern to understand human relations. As such, the study of homophily can provide key insights into the flow of information and behaviors within political contexts. Indeed, some degree of polarization is necessary for the functioning of liberal democracies, but too much polarization can increase the adoption of extreme political positions and create democratic gridlock. The relationship between homophilous communication ties and political polarization is thus fundamental because it affects a pillar of democratic regimes: the need for public debate where divergent ideas and interests can be confronted. This research compares the degree of homophily and political polarization in Catalan MPs’ Twitter mentions network to Dutch MPs’ Twitter mentions network. Exponential random graph models were employed on a one-year sample of mentions among Dutch MPs (N = 7,356) and on a one-year, three-month sample of mentions among Catalan MPs (N = 19,507). Party polarization was measured by calculating the external–internal index of both Twitter mentions networks. Results reveal that the mentions among Catalan MPs are much more homophilous than those among the Dutch MPs. Indeed, there is a positive relationship between the degree of MPs’ homophilous communication ties and the degree of political polarization observed in each network. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948/4948 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Marc Esteve-Del-Valle info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Marc Esteve-Del-Valle |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Networks and Organizing Processes in Online Social Media; 81-92 2183-2439 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130654185619456 |