Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948
Resumo: Homophily, the tendency of people to have ties with those who are similar, is a fundamental pattern to understand human relations. As such, the study of homophily can provide key insights into the flow of information and behaviors within political contexts. Indeed, some degree of polarization is necessary for the functioning of liberal democracies, but too much polarization can increase the adoption of extreme political positions and create democratic gridlock. The relationship between homophilous communication ties and political polarization is thus fundamental because it affects a pillar of democratic regimes: the need for public debate where divergent ideas and interests can be confronted. This research compares the degree of homophily and political polarization in Catalan MPs’ Twitter mentions network to Dutch MPs’ Twitter mentions network. Exponential random graph models were employed on a one-year sample of mentions among Dutch MPs (N = 7,356) and on a one-year, three-month sample of mentions among Catalan MPs (N = 19,507). Party polarization was measured by calculating the external–internal index of both Twitter mentions networks. Results reveal that the mentions among Catalan MPs are much more homophilous than those among the Dutch MPs. Indeed, there is a positive relationship between the degree of MPs’ homophilous communication ties and the degree of political polarization observed in each network.
id RCAP_690791cfa31f03ee00ec3b5fe76e4654
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysishomophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; TwitterHomophily, the tendency of people to have ties with those who are similar, is a fundamental pattern to understand human relations. As such, the study of homophily can provide key insights into the flow of information and behaviors within political contexts. Indeed, some degree of polarization is necessary for the functioning of liberal democracies, but too much polarization can increase the adoption of extreme political positions and create democratic gridlock. The relationship between homophilous communication ties and political polarization is thus fundamental because it affects a pillar of democratic regimes: the need for public debate where divergent ideas and interests can be confronted. This research compares the degree of homophily and political polarization in Catalan MPs’ Twitter mentions network to Dutch MPs’ Twitter mentions network. Exponential random graph models were employed on a one-year sample of mentions among Dutch MPs (N = 7,356) and on a one-year, three-month sample of mentions among Catalan MPs (N = 19,507). Party polarization was measured by calculating the external–internal index of both Twitter mentions networks. Results reveal that the mentions among Catalan MPs are much more homophilous than those among the Dutch MPs. Indeed, there is a positive relationship between the degree of MPs’ homophilous communication ties and the degree of political polarization observed in each network.Cogitatio2022-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Networks and Organizing Processes in Online Social Media; 81-922183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948/4948Copyright (c) 2022 Marc Esteve-Del-Valleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsteve-Del-Valle, Marc2022-12-20T10:57:57Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:36.203284Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
title Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
spellingShingle Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc
homophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; Twitter
title_short Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
title_full Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
title_fullStr Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
title_sort Homophily and Polarization in Twitter Political Networks: A Cross-Country Analysis
author Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc
author_facet Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esteve-Del-Valle, Marc
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv homophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; Twitter
topic homophily; parliamentarians; political networks; political polarization; political communication; Twitter
description Homophily, the tendency of people to have ties with those who are similar, is a fundamental pattern to understand human relations. As such, the study of homophily can provide key insights into the flow of information and behaviors within political contexts. Indeed, some degree of polarization is necessary for the functioning of liberal democracies, but too much polarization can increase the adoption of extreme political positions and create democratic gridlock. The relationship between homophilous communication ties and political polarization is thus fundamental because it affects a pillar of democratic regimes: the need for public debate where divergent ideas and interests can be confronted. This research compares the degree of homophily and political polarization in Catalan MPs’ Twitter mentions network to Dutch MPs’ Twitter mentions network. Exponential random graph models were employed on a one-year sample of mentions among Dutch MPs (N = 7,356) and on a one-year, three-month sample of mentions among Catalan MPs (N = 19,507). Party polarization was measured by calculating the external–internal index of both Twitter mentions networks. Results reveal that the mentions among Catalan MPs are much more homophilous than those among the Dutch MPs. Indeed, there is a positive relationship between the degree of MPs’ homophilous communication ties and the degree of political polarization observed in each network.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4948
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4948
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4948/4948
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Marc Esteve-Del-Valle
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Marc Esteve-Del-Valle
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Networks and Organizing Processes in Online Social Media; 81-92
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130654185619456