Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Magalhães, Lúcia, Henriques, Mariana, Oliveira, Rosário
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967
Resumo: Antimicrobial fabrics are increasingly important in a great variety of applications and thus several standard methods to evaluate their efficiency have been developed. However, there is no consensus on the most adequate method to be used. Therefore, aim of this work was to compare the practical applicability of the best known standards: AATCC 147, ISO 20645:2004, AATCC:100 and JIS L 1902. Four samples, with different amounts of antimicrobial agents, were used. It was tested 3 qualitative methods (AATCC 147, ISO 20645 and JIS L 1902–Halo method) and 2 quantitative (AATCC 100 and JIS L 1902–Absorption method). For each method, both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria were used. Textiles samples assayed did not present diffusible activity, thus only the qualitative results from the AATCC 147 and the Halo method could be analyzed and no differences were observed between them. Therefore, the AATCC 147 or the JIS L 1902–Halo method can be used for a simple and expedite screening of a large amount of samples with or without diffusible antimicrobial activity. In contrast, the ISO 20645 can only be used when diffusible antimicrobial agents are present. Concerning the two quantitative methods, the results showed that the JIS L 1902 method is more sensitive to the amount of antimicrobial agent than the AATCC 100 test. An additional assay also showed that the JIS L 1902 is sensitive enough to distinguish serial dilutions of the antimicrobial agent.
id RCAP_691c7c156cde1f5cc884c19c5089a977
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/25967
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparisonAntimicrobial textilesStandard methodsStaphylococcus aureusKlebsiella pneumoniaeScience & TechnologyAntimicrobial fabrics are increasingly important in a great variety of applications and thus several standard methods to evaluate their efficiency have been developed. However, there is no consensus on the most adequate method to be used. Therefore, aim of this work was to compare the practical applicability of the best known standards: AATCC 147, ISO 20645:2004, AATCC:100 and JIS L 1902. Four samples, with different amounts of antimicrobial agents, were used. It was tested 3 qualitative methods (AATCC 147, ISO 20645 and JIS L 1902–Halo method) and 2 quantitative (AATCC 100 and JIS L 1902–Absorption method). For each method, both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria were used. Textiles samples assayed did not present diffusible activity, thus only the qualitative results from the AATCC 147 and the Halo method could be analyzed and no differences were observed between them. Therefore, the AATCC 147 or the JIS L 1902–Halo method can be used for a simple and expedite screening of a large amount of samples with or without diffusible antimicrobial activity. In contrast, the ISO 20645 can only be used when diffusible antimicrobial agents are present. Concerning the two quantitative methods, the results showed that the JIS L 1902 method is more sensitive to the amount of antimicrobial agent than the AATCC 100 test. An additional assay also showed that the JIS L 1902 is sensitive enough to distinguish serial dilutions of the antimicrobial agent.SpringerUniversidade do MinhoPinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva SantosMagalhães, LúciaHenriques, MarianaOliveira, Rosário20112011-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967engPinho, E., Magalhães, L., Henriques, M., & Oliveira, R. (2010, November 23). Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison. Annals of Microbiology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0163-81590-426110.1007/s13213-010-0163-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:52:02Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/25967Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:51:04.738703Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
title Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
spellingShingle Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos
Antimicrobial textiles
Standard methods
Staphylococcus aureus
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Science & Technology
title_short Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
title_full Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
title_fullStr Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
title_sort Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
author Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos
author_facet Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos
Magalhães, Lúcia
Henriques, Mariana
Oliveira, Rosário
author_role author
author2 Magalhães, Lúcia
Henriques, Mariana
Oliveira, Rosário
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos
Magalhães, Lúcia
Henriques, Mariana
Oliveira, Rosário
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial textiles
Standard methods
Staphylococcus aureus
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Science & Technology
topic Antimicrobial textiles
Standard methods
Staphylococcus aureus
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Science & Technology
description Antimicrobial fabrics are increasingly important in a great variety of applications and thus several standard methods to evaluate their efficiency have been developed. However, there is no consensus on the most adequate method to be used. Therefore, aim of this work was to compare the practical applicability of the best known standards: AATCC 147, ISO 20645:2004, AATCC:100 and JIS L 1902. Four samples, with different amounts of antimicrobial agents, were used. It was tested 3 qualitative methods (AATCC 147, ISO 20645 and JIS L 1902–Halo method) and 2 quantitative (AATCC 100 and JIS L 1902–Absorption method). For each method, both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria were used. Textiles samples assayed did not present diffusible activity, thus only the qualitative results from the AATCC 147 and the Halo method could be analyzed and no differences were observed between them. Therefore, the AATCC 147 or the JIS L 1902–Halo method can be used for a simple and expedite screening of a large amount of samples with or without diffusible antimicrobial activity. In contrast, the ISO 20645 can only be used when diffusible antimicrobial agents are present. Concerning the two quantitative methods, the results showed that the JIS L 1902 method is more sensitive to the amount of antimicrobial agent than the AATCC 100 test. An additional assay also showed that the JIS L 1902 is sensitive enough to distinguish serial dilutions of the antimicrobial agent.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Pinho, E., Magalhães, L., Henriques, M., & Oliveira, R. (2010, November 23). Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison. Annals of Microbiology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0163-8
1590-4261
10.1007/s13213-010-0163-8
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133097514500096