Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967 |
Resumo: | Antimicrobial fabrics are increasingly important in a great variety of applications and thus several standard methods to evaluate their efficiency have been developed. However, there is no consensus on the most adequate method to be used. Therefore, aim of this work was to compare the practical applicability of the best known standards: AATCC 147, ISO 20645:2004, AATCC:100 and JIS L 1902. Four samples, with different amounts of antimicrobial agents, were used. It was tested 3 qualitative methods (AATCC 147, ISO 20645 and JIS L 1902–Halo method) and 2 quantitative (AATCC 100 and JIS L 1902–Absorption method). For each method, both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria were used. Textiles samples assayed did not present diffusible activity, thus only the qualitative results from the AATCC 147 and the Halo method could be analyzed and no differences were observed between them. Therefore, the AATCC 147 or the JIS L 1902–Halo method can be used for a simple and expedite screening of a large amount of samples with or without diffusible antimicrobial activity. In contrast, the ISO 20645 can only be used when diffusible antimicrobial agents are present. Concerning the two quantitative methods, the results showed that the JIS L 1902 method is more sensitive to the amount of antimicrobial agent than the AATCC 100 test. An additional assay also showed that the JIS L 1902 is sensitive enough to distinguish serial dilutions of the antimicrobial agent. |
id |
RCAP_691c7c156cde1f5cc884c19c5089a977 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/25967 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparisonAntimicrobial textilesStandard methodsStaphylococcus aureusKlebsiella pneumoniaeScience & TechnologyAntimicrobial fabrics are increasingly important in a great variety of applications and thus several standard methods to evaluate their efficiency have been developed. However, there is no consensus on the most adequate method to be used. Therefore, aim of this work was to compare the practical applicability of the best known standards: AATCC 147, ISO 20645:2004, AATCC:100 and JIS L 1902. Four samples, with different amounts of antimicrobial agents, were used. It was tested 3 qualitative methods (AATCC 147, ISO 20645 and JIS L 1902–Halo method) and 2 quantitative (AATCC 100 and JIS L 1902–Absorption method). For each method, both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria were used. Textiles samples assayed did not present diffusible activity, thus only the qualitative results from the AATCC 147 and the Halo method could be analyzed and no differences were observed between them. Therefore, the AATCC 147 or the JIS L 1902–Halo method can be used for a simple and expedite screening of a large amount of samples with or without diffusible antimicrobial activity. In contrast, the ISO 20645 can only be used when diffusible antimicrobial agents are present. Concerning the two quantitative methods, the results showed that the JIS L 1902 method is more sensitive to the amount of antimicrobial agent than the AATCC 100 test. An additional assay also showed that the JIS L 1902 is sensitive enough to distinguish serial dilutions of the antimicrobial agent.SpringerUniversidade do MinhoPinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva SantosMagalhães, LúciaHenriques, MarianaOliveira, Rosário20112011-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967engPinho, E., Magalhães, L., Henriques, M., & Oliveira, R. (2010, November 23). Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison. Annals of Microbiology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0163-81590-426110.1007/s13213-010-0163-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:52:02Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/25967Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:51:04.738703Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison |
title |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison |
spellingShingle |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos Antimicrobial textiles Standard methods Staphylococcus aureus Klebsiella pneumoniae Science & Technology |
title_short |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison |
title_full |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison |
title_sort |
Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison |
author |
Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos |
author_facet |
Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos Magalhães, Lúcia Henriques, Mariana Oliveira, Rosário |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magalhães, Lúcia Henriques, Mariana Oliveira, Rosário |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinho, Eva Patrícia Paiva Santos Magalhães, Lúcia Henriques, Mariana Oliveira, Rosário |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial textiles Standard methods Staphylococcus aureus Klebsiella pneumoniae Science & Technology |
topic |
Antimicrobial textiles Standard methods Staphylococcus aureus Klebsiella pneumoniae Science & Technology |
description |
Antimicrobial fabrics are increasingly important in a great variety of applications and thus several standard methods to evaluate their efficiency have been developed. However, there is no consensus on the most adequate method to be used. Therefore, aim of this work was to compare the practical applicability of the best known standards: AATCC 147, ISO 20645:2004, AATCC:100 and JIS L 1902. Four samples, with different amounts of antimicrobial agents, were used. It was tested 3 qualitative methods (AATCC 147, ISO 20645 and JIS L 1902–Halo method) and 2 quantitative (AATCC 100 and JIS L 1902–Absorption method). For each method, both Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria were used. Textiles samples assayed did not present diffusible activity, thus only the qualitative results from the AATCC 147 and the Halo method could be analyzed and no differences were observed between them. Therefore, the AATCC 147 or the JIS L 1902–Halo method can be used for a simple and expedite screening of a large amount of samples with or without diffusible antimicrobial activity. In contrast, the ISO 20645 can only be used when diffusible antimicrobial agents are present. Concerning the two quantitative methods, the results showed that the JIS L 1902 method is more sensitive to the amount of antimicrobial agent than the AATCC 100 test. An additional assay also showed that the JIS L 1902 is sensitive enough to distinguish serial dilutions of the antimicrobial agent. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25967 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Pinho, E., Magalhães, L., Henriques, M., & Oliveira, R. (2010, November 23). Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: standard methods comparison. Annals of Microbiology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0163-8 1590-4261 10.1007/s13213-010-0163-8 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133097514500096 |