How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/15773 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10044 |
Resumo: | To explain the determinants of negative behavior toward deviants (e.g., punishment), this article examines how people evaluate others on the basis of two types of standards: minimal and maximal. Minimal standards focus on an absolute cutoff point for appropriate behavior; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies dichotomously between acceptable or unacceptable. Maximal standards focus on the degree of deviation from that standard; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies gradually from positive to less positive. This framework leads to the prediction that violation of minimal standards should elicit punishment regardless of the degree of deviation, whereas punishment in response to violations of maximal standards should depend on the degree of deviation. Four studies assessed or manipulated the type of standard and degree of deviation displayed by a target. Results consistently showed the expected interaction between type of standard (minimal and maximal) and degree of deviation on punishment behavior. |
id |
RCAP_7787f33dc29e921c0adf8448811dd022 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10044 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviantsMinimal and maximal standardsPunishmentDeviant behaviorMoral decisionJusticeAbsolute and graded evaluationTo explain the determinants of negative behavior toward deviants (e.g., punishment), this article examines how people evaluate others on the basis of two types of standards: minimal and maximal. Minimal standards focus on an absolute cutoff point for appropriate behavior; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies dichotomously between acceptable or unacceptable. Maximal standards focus on the degree of deviation from that standard; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies gradually from positive to less positive. This framework leads to the prediction that violation of minimal standards should elicit punishment regardless of the degree of deviation, whereas punishment in response to violations of maximal standards should depend on the degree of deviation. Four studies assessed or manipulated the type of standard and degree of deviation displayed by a target. Results consistently showed the expected interaction between type of standard (minimal and maximal) and degree of deviation on punishment behavior.SAGE Publications Ltd2015-10-29T14:54:25Z2010-01-01T00:00:00Z20102015-10-29T14:27:57Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/15773http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10044eng0146-1672Kessler, T.Neumann, J.Mummendey, A.Berthold, A.Schubert, T.Waldzus, S.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:51:04Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10044Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:25:16.485643Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants |
title |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants |
spellingShingle |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants Kessler, T. Minimal and maximal standards Punishment Deviant behavior Moral decision Justice Absolute and graded evaluation |
title_short |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants |
title_full |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants |
title_fullStr |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants |
title_full_unstemmed |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants |
title_sort |
How do we assign punishment? The impact of minimal and maximal standards on the evaluation of deviants |
author |
Kessler, T. |
author_facet |
Kessler, T. Neumann, J. Mummendey, A. Berthold, A. Schubert, T. Waldzus, S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neumann, J. Mummendey, A. Berthold, A. Schubert, T. Waldzus, S. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kessler, T. Neumann, J. Mummendey, A. Berthold, A. Schubert, T. Waldzus, S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Minimal and maximal standards Punishment Deviant behavior Moral decision Justice Absolute and graded evaluation |
topic |
Minimal and maximal standards Punishment Deviant behavior Moral decision Justice Absolute and graded evaluation |
description |
To explain the determinants of negative behavior toward deviants (e.g., punishment), this article examines how people evaluate others on the basis of two types of standards: minimal and maximal. Minimal standards focus on an absolute cutoff point for appropriate behavior; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies dichotomously between acceptable or unacceptable. Maximal standards focus on the degree of deviation from that standard; accordingly, the evaluation of others varies gradually from positive to less positive. This framework leads to the prediction that violation of minimal standards should elicit punishment regardless of the degree of deviation, whereas punishment in response to violations of maximal standards should depend on the degree of deviation. Four studies assessed or manipulated the type of standard and degree of deviation displayed by a target. Results consistently showed the expected interaction between type of standard (minimal and maximal) and degree of deviation on punishment behavior. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z 2010 2015-10-29T14:54:25Z 2015-10-29T14:27:57Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/15773 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10044 |
url |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/15773 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10044 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0146-1672 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134815693307904 |