Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149
Resumo: Public procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute.
id RCAP_7fcab2d25e6df07023b40d283eb74ff2
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/141149
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Meios de solução de litígios na contratação públicaArbitragem administrativaDireito da contratação públicaEfetividade da justiça administrativaAdministrative arbitrationAdministrative bodiesPublic Procurement LawEffectiveness of administrative justiceDireitoPublic procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute.A contratação pública tem uma importância ímpar na economia da Comunidade Europeia. Com o advento da promulgação das “Diretivas Recursos” nº 89\665\CEE e 92\13\CEE, ambas alteradas pela Diretiva 2007\66\CE, ocorreu a abertura dos contratos públicos na proporção da União Europeia. Na dimensão institucional, considerando a lentidão dos órgãos judiciais dos Países-Membros, intencionava as Diretivas Recursos o estabelecimentos de recursos rápidos e eficazes. Em razão disso, os Países da UE buscaram soluções para assegurar o direito dos cidadãos, mediante a marcha eficiente e rápida da justiça, com a resolução efetiva do seu problema em tempo útil. A opção portuguesa foi pela arbitragem administrativa. Por outro lado, 14 Países da UE ensaiaram a solução de seus conflitos da contratação pública por meio da instância administrativa. Propõe-se uma reflexão sobre os dois modelos: arbitragem e instância administrativa e sobre a possibilidade de o ordenamento jurídico português adotar a instância administrativa, de modo a resolver os conflitos oriundos da contratação pública. Para responder tal questionamento, foi realizado um estudo bibliográfico, por um lado, da organização do contencioso-administrativo em Portugal e do mecanismo alternativo de resolução de conflitos que utiliza, e por outro, foi realizado um exame do direito estrangeiro. Concluiu-se que o modelo da instância administrativa não é somente uma alternativa à administração da Justiça, mas sim, é um meio adequado para solucionar problemas atinentes à contratação pública. Contudo, no momento, Portugal, não deveria adotar tal modelo, mas sim, aperfeiçoar sua arbitragem administrativa. Foram propostas medidas pontuais para possíveis correções das debilidades deste instituto.Pedro, RIcardoRUNRamme, Luiza Cecilia2022-01-272021-08-132025-01-27T00:00:00Z2022-01-27T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149TID:202992527porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:18:27Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/141149Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:49:56.271959Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
spellingShingle Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
Direito
title_short Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_full Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_fullStr Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_full_unstemmed Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_sort Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
author Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
author_facet Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Pedro, RIcardo
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
Direito
topic Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
Direito
description Public procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-13
2022-01-27
2022-01-27T00:00:00Z
2025-01-27T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149
TID:202992527
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149
identifier_str_mv TID:202992527
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138097054613504