Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149 |
Resumo: | Public procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute. |
id |
RCAP_7fcab2d25e6df07023b40d283eb74ff2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/141149 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação públicaArbitragem administrativaDireito da contratação públicaEfetividade da justiça administrativaAdministrative arbitrationAdministrative bodiesPublic Procurement LawEffectiveness of administrative justiceDireitoPublic procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute.A contratação pública tem uma importância ímpar na economia da Comunidade Europeia. Com o advento da promulgação das “Diretivas Recursos” nº 89\665\CEE e 92\13\CEE, ambas alteradas pela Diretiva 2007\66\CE, ocorreu a abertura dos contratos públicos na proporção da União Europeia. Na dimensão institucional, considerando a lentidão dos órgãos judiciais dos Países-Membros, intencionava as Diretivas Recursos o estabelecimentos de recursos rápidos e eficazes. Em razão disso, os Países da UE buscaram soluções para assegurar o direito dos cidadãos, mediante a marcha eficiente e rápida da justiça, com a resolução efetiva do seu problema em tempo útil. A opção portuguesa foi pela arbitragem administrativa. Por outro lado, 14 Países da UE ensaiaram a solução de seus conflitos da contratação pública por meio da instância administrativa. Propõe-se uma reflexão sobre os dois modelos: arbitragem e instância administrativa e sobre a possibilidade de o ordenamento jurídico português adotar a instância administrativa, de modo a resolver os conflitos oriundos da contratação pública. Para responder tal questionamento, foi realizado um estudo bibliográfico, por um lado, da organização do contencioso-administrativo em Portugal e do mecanismo alternativo de resolução de conflitos que utiliza, e por outro, foi realizado um exame do direito estrangeiro. Concluiu-se que o modelo da instância administrativa não é somente uma alternativa à administração da Justiça, mas sim, é um meio adequado para solucionar problemas atinentes à contratação pública. Contudo, no momento, Portugal, não deveria adotar tal modelo, mas sim, aperfeiçoar sua arbitragem administrativa. Foram propostas medidas pontuais para possíveis correções das debilidades deste instituto.Pedro, RIcardoRUNRamme, Luiza Cecilia2022-01-272021-08-132025-01-27T00:00:00Z2022-01-27T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149TID:202992527porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:18:27Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/141149Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:49:56.271959Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública |
title |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública |
spellingShingle |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública Ramme, Luiza Cecilia Arbitragem administrativa Direito da contratação pública Efetividade da justiça administrativa Administrative arbitration Administrative bodies Public Procurement Law Effectiveness of administrative justice Direito |
title_short |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública |
title_full |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública |
title_fullStr |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública |
title_sort |
Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública |
author |
Ramme, Luiza Cecilia |
author_facet |
Ramme, Luiza Cecilia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Pedro, RIcardo RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramme, Luiza Cecilia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arbitragem administrativa Direito da contratação pública Efetividade da justiça administrativa Administrative arbitration Administrative bodies Public Procurement Law Effectiveness of administrative justice Direito |
topic |
Arbitragem administrativa Direito da contratação pública Efetividade da justiça administrativa Administrative arbitration Administrative bodies Public Procurement Law Effectiveness of administrative justice Direito |
description |
Public procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-13 2022-01-27 2022-01-27T00:00:00Z 2025-01-27T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149 TID:202992527 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202992527 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138097054613504 |