What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Piçarra, N.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, N., Chambel, T., Arriaga, P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23728
Resumo: Browsing online ratings and viewers’ comments is an integral part of the experience of choosing and watching a movie. Current theories have broadened the concept of entertainment beyond amusement (hedonic motives) to include experiences of meaning, value, and self-development (eudaimonic motives). With a between-subjects design, we examined the role of the reviewer’s rating (medium rating vs high rating), comments (hedonic vs. eudaimonic), and participant’s gratification style on their interest in watching a movie. Results showed that participants (N = 383) reported a higher preference for the high rating movie. Results also revealed a match between comment type and individual gratification style, with participants with hedonic motives reporting more interest in the movie with hedonic comments, and those reporting eudaimonic motives for the movie with eudaimonic comments.
id RCAP_8125e3c1b20130caeb6296133984bca7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23728
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification styleEudaimonicGratification styleHedonicReview commentReview ratingBrowsing online ratings and viewers’ comments is an integral part of the experience of choosing and watching a movie. Current theories have broadened the concept of entertainment beyond amusement (hedonic motives) to include experiences of meaning, value, and self-development (eudaimonic motives). With a between-subjects design, we examined the role of the reviewer’s rating (medium rating vs high rating), comments (hedonic vs. eudaimonic), and participant’s gratification style on their interest in watching a movie. Results showed that participants (N = 383) reported a higher preference for the high rating movie. Results also revealed a match between comment type and individual gratification style, with participants with hedonic motives reporting more interest in the movie with hedonic comments, and those reporting eudaimonic motives for the movie with eudaimonic comments.Berghahn2023-05-30T00:00:00Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-12-14T17:57:19Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/23728eng1934-968810.3167/proj.2021.150302Piçarra, N.Silva, N.Chambel, T.Arriaga, P.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:59:53Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/23728Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:31:34.587552Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
title What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
spellingShingle What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
Piçarra, N.
Eudaimonic
Gratification style
Hedonic
Review comment
Review rating
title_short What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
title_full What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
title_fullStr What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
title_full_unstemmed What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
title_sort What movie will I watch today? The role of online review ratings, reviewers’ comments, and user’s gratification style
author Piçarra, N.
author_facet Piçarra, N.
Silva, N.
Chambel, T.
Arriaga, P.
author_role author
author2 Silva, N.
Chambel, T.
Arriaga, P.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Piçarra, N.
Silva, N.
Chambel, T.
Arriaga, P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eudaimonic
Gratification style
Hedonic
Review comment
Review rating
topic Eudaimonic
Gratification style
Hedonic
Review comment
Review rating
description Browsing online ratings and viewers’ comments is an integral part of the experience of choosing and watching a movie. Current theories have broadened the concept of entertainment beyond amusement (hedonic motives) to include experiences of meaning, value, and self-development (eudaimonic motives). With a between-subjects design, we examined the role of the reviewer’s rating (medium rating vs high rating), comments (hedonic vs. eudaimonic), and participant’s gratification style on their interest in watching a movie. Results showed that participants (N = 383) reported a higher preference for the high rating movie. Results also revealed a match between comment type and individual gratification style, with participants with hedonic motives reporting more interest in the movie with hedonic comments, and those reporting eudaimonic motives for the movie with eudaimonic comments.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2021-12-14T17:57:19Z
2023-05-30T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23728
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/23728
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1934-9688
10.3167/proj.2021.150302
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berghahn
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berghahn
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134877201727488