Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miranda Justo, José
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n7.22445
Resumo: The Communist Manifesto, basically written by Marx immediately after the second congress of the League of the Communists that took place between November the 29th and December the 8th of 1847, contains various elements which – besides a certain conception of history based on the concept of “class struggles” – also point out in the direction of an embryonic philosophy of history. Departing from the Deleuzian conception of “philosophy” and of the “concept”, but also from a conceptual distinction of diversity, multiplicity and heterogeneity that tries to reformulate the concept of “multiplicity” as it was used by Deleuze and Guattari, the present article aims at demonstrating that the philosophy of history to be found in status nascens in the Manifesto is characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity which allows for a reading of the text decidedly oriented toward a Marxian openness of history, thus contradicting the ultra-unitary and closed attitude of the most current readings.
id RCAP_879309e3c7640d4158565b13295b240c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22445
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist ManifestoHeterogeneidades – uma perspectiva invulgar da filosofia da história a partir do Manifesto ComunistaThe Communist Manifesto, basically written by Marx immediately after the second congress of the League of the Communists that took place between November the 29th and December the 8th of 1847, contains various elements which – besides a certain conception of history based on the concept of “class struggles” – also point out in the direction of an embryonic philosophy of history. Departing from the Deleuzian conception of “philosophy” and of the “concept”, but also from a conceptual distinction of diversity, multiplicity and heterogeneity that tries to reformulate the concept of “multiplicity” as it was used by Deleuze and Guattari, the present article aims at demonstrating that the philosophy of history to be found in status nascens in the Manifesto is characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity which allows for a reading of the text decidedly oriented toward a Marxian openness of history, thus contradicting the ultra-unitary and closed attitude of the most current readings.O Manifesto Comunista, redigido basicamente por Marx imediatamente após o segundo congresso da Liga dos Comunistas, decorrido entre 29 de Novembro e 8 de Dezembro de 1847, contém elementos vários que, para além de uma certa concepção da história baseada no conceito de «lutas de classes», apontam igualmente no sentido de uma filosofia da história embrionária. Partindo da concepção deleuziana de «filosofia» e de «conceito», mas também de uma distinção conceptual entre diversidade, multiplicidade e heterogeneidade que procura aprofundar a concepção da «multiplicidade» em Deleuze e Guattari, este artigo trata de demonstrar que a filosofia da história que se encontra em estado nascente no Manifesto é caracterizada por um elevado grau de heterogeneidade que permite uma leitura do texto decididamente orientada na direcção de uma abertura marxia- na da história que contradiz o ultra-unitarismo e o fechamento das leituras mais vulgarizadas.Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa2021-01-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n7.22445https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n7.22445Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; No. 7 (2018); 77-104Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; N.º 7 (2018); 77-1042183-590Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22445https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22445/16546Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Pastinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiranda Justo, José2023-04-15T05:23:07Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22445Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:49:20.019173Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
Heterogeneidades – uma perspectiva invulgar da filosofia da história a partir do Manifesto Comunista
title Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
spellingShingle Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
Miranda Justo, José
title_short Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
title_full Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
title_fullStr Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
title_sort Heterogeneities – an unusual perspective of the philosophy of history based on The Communist Manifesto
author Miranda Justo, José
author_facet Miranda Justo, José
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miranda Justo, José
description The Communist Manifesto, basically written by Marx immediately after the second congress of the League of the Communists that took place between November the 29th and December the 8th of 1847, contains various elements which – besides a certain conception of history based on the concept of “class struggles” – also point out in the direction of an embryonic philosophy of history. Departing from the Deleuzian conception of “philosophy” and of the “concept”, but also from a conceptual distinction of diversity, multiplicity and heterogeneity that tries to reformulate the concept of “multiplicity” as it was used by Deleuze and Guattari, the present article aims at demonstrating that the philosophy of history to be found in status nascens in the Manifesto is characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity which allows for a reading of the text decidedly oriented toward a Marxian openness of history, thus contradicting the ultra-unitary and closed attitude of the most current readings.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n7.22445
https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n7.22445
url https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n7.22445
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22445
https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22445/16546
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; No. 7 (2018); 77-104
Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; N.º 7 (2018); 77-104
2183-590X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131574524968960

Registros relacionados