Controversias como método para anti-história

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tureta, César
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Américo, Bruno, Clegg, Stewart
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/114762
Resumo: Our aim is to develop and propose a method for ANTi-historians, using analysis of controversy as the starting point. Despite the theoretical and methodological development of the ANTi-history approach to the study of knowledge of the past and the creation of its history, there is room for method development based on controversy analysis. We ground our proposal in some of ANTi-history’s assumptions (relationalism, the symmetry principle, and multiplicity) and practical concepts (translation and politics of actor-networks). In addition, we recommend four criteria that researchers should use in choosing a controversy to serve as a starting point for investigation. Finally, we present five steps for investigating knowledge of the past and the creation of history.
id RCAP_8857368eb611e76bf2912fffd1d8bd71
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/114762
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Controversias como método para anti-históriaControversies as method for anti-historyactor-network theoryANTi-historycontroversieshistoric turnorganizational historyBusiness and International ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)Industrial relationsStrategy and ManagementManagement Science and Operations ResearchOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementInformation Systems and ManagementMarketingManagement of Technology and InnovationSDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and InfrastructureOur aim is to develop and propose a method for ANTi-historians, using analysis of controversy as the starting point. Despite the theoretical and methodological development of the ANTi-history approach to the study of knowledge of the past and the creation of its history, there is room for method development based on controversy analysis. We ground our proposal in some of ANTi-history’s assumptions (relationalism, the symmetry principle, and multiplicity) and practical concepts (translation and politics of actor-networks). In addition, we recommend four criteria that researchers should use in choosing a controversy to serve as a starting point for investigation. Finally, we present five steps for investigating knowledge of the past and the creation of history.NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE)RUNTureta, CésarAmérico, BrunoClegg, Stewart2021-03-30T22:22:00Z2021-012021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article12application/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/114762por0034-7590PURE: 28940995https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210105info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:57:32Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/114762Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:42:38.055381Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Controversias como método para anti-história
Controversies as method for anti-history
title Controversias como método para anti-história
spellingShingle Controversias como método para anti-história
Tureta, César
actor-network theory
ANTi-history
controversies
historic turn
organizational history
Business and International Management
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Industrial relations
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Information Systems and Management
Marketing
Management of Technology and Innovation
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
title_short Controversias como método para anti-história
title_full Controversias como método para anti-história
title_fullStr Controversias como método para anti-história
title_full_unstemmed Controversias como método para anti-história
title_sort Controversias como método para anti-história
author Tureta, César
author_facet Tureta, César
Américo, Bruno
Clegg, Stewart
author_role author
author2 Américo, Bruno
Clegg, Stewart
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tureta, César
Américo, Bruno
Clegg, Stewart
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv actor-network theory
ANTi-history
controversies
historic turn
organizational history
Business and International Management
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Industrial relations
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Information Systems and Management
Marketing
Management of Technology and Innovation
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
topic actor-network theory
ANTi-history
controversies
historic turn
organizational history
Business and International Management
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Industrial relations
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Information Systems and Management
Marketing
Management of Technology and Innovation
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
description Our aim is to develop and propose a method for ANTi-historians, using analysis of controversy as the starting point. Despite the theoretical and methodological development of the ANTi-history approach to the study of knowledge of the past and the creation of its history, there is room for method development based on controversy analysis. We ground our proposal in some of ANTi-history’s assumptions (relationalism, the symmetry principle, and multiplicity) and practical concepts (translation and politics of actor-networks). In addition, we recommend four criteria that researchers should use in choosing a controversy to serve as a starting point for investigation. Finally, we present five steps for investigating knowledge of the past and the creation of history.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-30T22:22:00Z
2021-01
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/114762
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/114762
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0034-7590
PURE: 28940995
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210105
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 12
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138037826846720

Registros relacionados