Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/17953 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9469 |
Resumo: | Purpose - This study aims to examine workers' distributive and interactional justice perceptions at three different moments in time over a period of eight years, assess their degree of stability and identify their most stable antecedents and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - Data was collected through an overlapping repeated cross-sectional design. Of the participants involved, 334 were surveyed in 2000, 259 participated in 2004, and 285 participated in 2008. Findings - Distributive justice is more stable than interactional justice. Organizational support is the most stable predictor of distributive justice, and the quality of supervisor practices is the most stable predictor of interactional justice. Contrary to expected, interactional justice has a stronger relationship to workers' attitudes directed both at the organization and supervisor, and at the immediate work context. Originality/value - This study adopts a long-term perspective covering an eight-year period. Furthermore, it focuses on two dimensions of justice that have been less studied over time. |
id |
RCAP_99cb358516c1cc7d703769bb9a3a060a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/9469 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the sameEvolutionEmployee attitudesDistributive justiceInteractional justicePurpose - This study aims to examine workers' distributive and interactional justice perceptions at three different moments in time over a period of eight years, assess their degree of stability and identify their most stable antecedents and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - Data was collected through an overlapping repeated cross-sectional design. Of the participants involved, 334 were surveyed in 2000, 259 participated in 2004, and 285 participated in 2008. Findings - Distributive justice is more stable than interactional justice. Organizational support is the most stable predictor of distributive justice, and the quality of supervisor practices is the most stable predictor of interactional justice. Contrary to expected, interactional justice has a stronger relationship to workers' attitudes directed both at the organization and supervisor, and at the immediate work context. Originality/value - This study adopts a long-term perspective covering an eight-year period. Furthermore, it focuses on two dimensions of justice that have been less studied over time.Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.2015-07-29T11:22:44Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Z20142015-07-29T11:21:41Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/17953http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9469eng0953-4814Silva, M. R.Caetano, A.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:48:53Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/9469Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:23:54.851347Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same |
title |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same |
spellingShingle |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same Silva, M. R. Evolution Employee attitudes Distributive justice Interactional justice |
title_short |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same |
title_full |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same |
title_fullStr |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same |
title_sort |
Organizational justice: what changes, what remains the same |
author |
Silva, M. R. |
author_facet |
Silva, M. R. Caetano, A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Caetano, A. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, M. R. Caetano, A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Evolution Employee attitudes Distributive justice Interactional justice |
topic |
Evolution Employee attitudes Distributive justice Interactional justice |
description |
Purpose - This study aims to examine workers' distributive and interactional justice perceptions at three different moments in time over a period of eight years, assess their degree of stability and identify their most stable antecedents and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - Data was collected through an overlapping repeated cross-sectional design. Of the participants involved, 334 were surveyed in 2000, 259 participated in 2004, and 285 participated in 2008. Findings - Distributive justice is more stable than interactional justice. Organizational support is the most stable predictor of distributive justice, and the quality of supervisor practices is the most stable predictor of interactional justice. Contrary to expected, interactional justice has a stronger relationship to workers' attitudes directed both at the organization and supervisor, and at the immediate work context. Originality/value - This study adopts a long-term perspective covering an eight-year period. Furthermore, it focuses on two dimensions of justice that have been less studied over time. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014 2015-07-29T11:22:44Z 2015-07-29T11:21:41Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/17953 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9469 |
url |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/17953 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9469 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0953-4814 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134801518657536 |