A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Nuno
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Almeida, Arminda, Rodrigues, João Coutinho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/8731
Resumo: A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of vehicles with alternative powertrain technologies is presented. The approach is based on the non-compensatory ELECTRE TRI method and compares hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicles to conventional models. Criteria considered are ownership costs and restrictions to vehicle use, which apply mainly to electric vehicles. The methodology is applied to a case study of 94 vehicles of different market segments and alternative powertrains. The analysis is carried out per segment and considers two driver profiles, city and all-purpose, and a baseline scenario for all cases. Output is tested for statistical significance, with powertrain technology as disaggregating factor, and a sensitivity analysis on the base scenario is also carried out, as well as a comparison with results derived by a compensatory multicriteria method (TOPSIS). Results show that conventional vehicles are the top choice for the small vehicles segment, due to lower purchase prices and higher use flexibility. For medium sized vehicles, all powertrain technologies are competitive for city drivers, whereas for all-purpose drivers, use restrictions for electric vehicles make these less attractive. The baseline scenario and sensitivity analysis highlight that opting for an electric vehicle depends strongly on the driver's use flexibility needs. As such, an electric vehicle can be either very attractive or outright unusable, regardless of financial considerations. It is also seen that plug-in hybrids do not present any significant advantage, as compared to other, non-electric choices, due to their higher purchase prices.
id RCAP_9d4440548a1b6049daf2e1a6fbefe965
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/8731
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologiesAlternative powertrain technologiesAlternative fuel vehiclesConsumer acceptanceMulticriteria decision-makingELECTRE TRITOPSISODS::07:Energias Renováveis e AcessíveisODS::09:Indústria, Inovação e InfraestruturasODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades SustentáveisODS::13:Ação ClimáticaA multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of vehicles with alternative powertrain technologies is presented. The approach is based on the non-compensatory ELECTRE TRI method and compares hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicles to conventional models. Criteria considered are ownership costs and restrictions to vehicle use, which apply mainly to electric vehicles. The methodology is applied to a case study of 94 vehicles of different market segments and alternative powertrains. The analysis is carried out per segment and considers two driver profiles, city and all-purpose, and a baseline scenario for all cases. Output is tested for statistical significance, with powertrain technology as disaggregating factor, and a sensitivity analysis on the base scenario is also carried out, as well as a comparison with results derived by a compensatory multicriteria method (TOPSIS). Results show that conventional vehicles are the top choice for the small vehicles segment, due to lower purchase prices and higher use flexibility. For medium sized vehicles, all powertrain technologies are competitive for city drivers, whereas for all-purpose drivers, use restrictions for electric vehicles make these less attractive. The baseline scenario and sensitivity analysis highlight that opting for an electric vehicle depends strongly on the driver's use flexibility needs. As such, an electric vehicle can be either very attractive or outright unusable, regardless of financial considerations. It is also seen that plug-in hybrids do not present any significant advantage, as compared to other, non-electric choices, due to their higher purchase prices.UID/Multi/00308/2019Science Direct/ElsevierRepositório AbertoSousa, NunoAlmeida, ArmindaRodrigues, João Coutinho2019-11-08T11:43:30Z2019-102019-10-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/8731engSousa, Nuno; Almeida, Arminda; Rodrigues João Coutinho - A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies. "Transport Policy" [Em linha]. ISSN 0967-070X. 50 p.0967-070X10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-16T15:30:55Zoai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/8731Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:48:46.405711Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
title A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
spellingShingle A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
Sousa, Nuno
Alternative powertrain technologies
Alternative fuel vehicles
Consumer acceptance
Multicriteria decision-making
ELECTRE TRI
TOPSIS
ODS::07:Energias Renováveis e Acessíveis
ODS::09:Indústria, Inovação e Infraestruturas
ODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis
ODS::13:Ação Climática
title_short A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
title_full A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
title_fullStr A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
title_full_unstemmed A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
title_sort A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies
author Sousa, Nuno
author_facet Sousa, Nuno
Almeida, Arminda
Rodrigues, João Coutinho
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Arminda
Rodrigues, João Coutinho
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Aberto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Nuno
Almeida, Arminda
Rodrigues, João Coutinho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alternative powertrain technologies
Alternative fuel vehicles
Consumer acceptance
Multicriteria decision-making
ELECTRE TRI
TOPSIS
ODS::07:Energias Renováveis e Acessíveis
ODS::09:Indústria, Inovação e Infraestruturas
ODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis
ODS::13:Ação Climática
topic Alternative powertrain technologies
Alternative fuel vehicles
Consumer acceptance
Multicriteria decision-making
ELECTRE TRI
TOPSIS
ODS::07:Energias Renováveis e Acessíveis
ODS::09:Indústria, Inovação e Infraestruturas
ODS::11:Cidades e Comunidades Sustentáveis
ODS::13:Ação Climática
description A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of vehicles with alternative powertrain technologies is presented. The approach is based on the non-compensatory ELECTRE TRI method and compares hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicles to conventional models. Criteria considered are ownership costs and restrictions to vehicle use, which apply mainly to electric vehicles. The methodology is applied to a case study of 94 vehicles of different market segments and alternative powertrains. The analysis is carried out per segment and considers two driver profiles, city and all-purpose, and a baseline scenario for all cases. Output is tested for statistical significance, with powertrain technology as disaggregating factor, and a sensitivity analysis on the base scenario is also carried out, as well as a comparison with results derived by a compensatory multicriteria method (TOPSIS). Results show that conventional vehicles are the top choice for the small vehicles segment, due to lower purchase prices and higher use flexibility. For medium sized vehicles, all powertrain technologies are competitive for city drivers, whereas for all-purpose drivers, use restrictions for electric vehicles make these less attractive. The baseline scenario and sensitivity analysis highlight that opting for an electric vehicle depends strongly on the driver's use flexibility needs. As such, an electric vehicle can be either very attractive or outright unusable, regardless of financial considerations. It is also seen that plug-in hybrids do not present any significant advantage, as compared to other, non-electric choices, due to their higher purchase prices.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-08T11:43:30Z
2019-10
2019-10-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/8731
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/8731
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sousa, Nuno; Almeida, Arminda; Rodrigues João Coutinho - A multicriteria methodology for estimating consumer acceptance of alternative powertrain technologies. "Transport Policy" [Em linha]. ISSN 0967-070X. 50 p.
0967-070X
10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Science Direct/Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Science Direct/Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135069860790272