Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro, João
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Sousa, Nuno, Natividade-Jesus, Eduardo, Coutinho-Rodrigues, João
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103505
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095029
Resumo: This article presents a comparative accessibility study between a real city and its redraft as a Garden City. The benchmarking methodology involves defining and evaluating a location-based accessibility indicator in a GIS environment for the city of Coimbra, Portugal, and for the same city laid out as a Garden City, with the same number of inhabitants, jobs, and similar number of urban facilities. The results are derived as maps and weighted average distances per inhabitant to the facilities and jobs, and show that, for the Garden City, average distances drop to around 500 m for urban facilities and 1500 m for the combination of facilities and jobs, making much of the city accessible by walking and practically the whole of it accessible by cycling, with positive impact on transport sustainability and accessibility equity. The methodology can be extended to other benchmarking indicators and city layouts, and the quantitative results it yields make a valuable contribution to the debate on the ideal layout of cities. Moreover, it gives directions on how to improve real cities to address current and future sustainability concerns.
id RCAP_a0fe1fd4585a755595190f705f59a833
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103505
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden Cityurban layoutaccessibilitygarden cityGIScity model benchmarkingThis article presents a comparative accessibility study between a real city and its redraft as a Garden City. The benchmarking methodology involves defining and evaluating a location-based accessibility indicator in a GIS environment for the city of Coimbra, Portugal, and for the same city laid out as a Garden City, with the same number of inhabitants, jobs, and similar number of urban facilities. The results are derived as maps and weighted average distances per inhabitant to the facilities and jobs, and show that, for the Garden City, average distances drop to around 500 m for urban facilities and 1500 m for the combination of facilities and jobs, making much of the city accessible by walking and practically the whole of it accessible by cycling, with positive impact on transport sustainability and accessibility equity. The methodology can be extended to other benchmarking indicators and city layouts, and the quantitative results it yields make a valuable contribution to the debate on the ideal layout of cities. Moreover, it gives directions on how to improve real cities to address current and future sustainability concerns.2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103505http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103505https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095029eng2071-1050Monteiro, JoãoSousa, NunoNatividade-Jesus, EduardoCoutinho-Rodrigues, Joãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-11-16T21:35:59Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103505Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:19.781406Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
title Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
spellingShingle Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
Monteiro, João
urban layout
accessibility
garden city
GIS
city model benchmarking
title_short Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
title_full Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
title_fullStr Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
title_sort Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City
author Monteiro, João
author_facet Monteiro, João
Sousa, Nuno
Natividade-Jesus, Eduardo
Coutinho-Rodrigues, João
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Nuno
Natividade-Jesus, Eduardo
Coutinho-Rodrigues, João
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro, João
Sousa, Nuno
Natividade-Jesus, Eduardo
Coutinho-Rodrigues, João
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv urban layout
accessibility
garden city
GIS
city model benchmarking
topic urban layout
accessibility
garden city
GIS
city model benchmarking
description This article presents a comparative accessibility study between a real city and its redraft as a Garden City. The benchmarking methodology involves defining and evaluating a location-based accessibility indicator in a GIS environment for the city of Coimbra, Portugal, and for the same city laid out as a Garden City, with the same number of inhabitants, jobs, and similar number of urban facilities. The results are derived as maps and weighted average distances per inhabitant to the facilities and jobs, and show that, for the Garden City, average distances drop to around 500 m for urban facilities and 1500 m for the combination of facilities and jobs, making much of the city accessible by walking and practically the whole of it accessible by cycling, with positive impact on transport sustainability and accessibility equity. The methodology can be extended to other benchmarking indicators and city layouts, and the quantitative results it yields make a valuable contribution to the debate on the ideal layout of cities. Moreover, it gives directions on how to improve real cities to address current and future sustainability concerns.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103505
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103505
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095029
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103505
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095029
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2071-1050
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134096290480128