The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garção, Ana Carolina Martins
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146
Resumo: Accountability is a crucial element of organizational and social life. The concept specifies who must respond to whom and for what, dealing with agents’ expectations of having to justify their behaviors and actions to an accountable audience. As accountability type can influence the decision-making process in distinctive ways, the purpose of this study is to investigate how process and outcome accountability can affect the consumer decision-making process. Furthermore, this dissertation also explores the reasons behind the necessity of having to justify behaviors and possible decision-making biases arising from responsibility. To address the Research Questions, an experimental design was implemented through an online survey: participants were exposed to a purchase simulation and asked about their feelings towards that acquisition. Overall, 272 complete and valid answers were analyzed for the effects of satisfaction, accountability, justification activity, and confidence towards decision-making. Conclusions show that although there is a beneficial relationship between process accountability and decision satisfaction, this favorable effect cannot be generalized for all factors influencing purchases and deserves more in-depth and detailed analysis. Further, outcome accountability might be advantageous in certain circumstances. Limitations and future research suggestions are determined and explained at the end of this study.
id RCAP_a3030f4907d82bbe6a7c974a9f035aa0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/31146
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making processAccountabilityDecision-making processConsumer behaviorNeed for justificationDecision-making biasesOverconfidenceConformityResponsabilidadeProcesso de tomada de decisãoComportamento do consumidorNecessidade de justificaçãoTomadas de decisão enviesadasExcesso de confiançaConformidadeDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoAccountability is a crucial element of organizational and social life. The concept specifies who must respond to whom and for what, dealing with agents’ expectations of having to justify their behaviors and actions to an accountable audience. As accountability type can influence the decision-making process in distinctive ways, the purpose of this study is to investigate how process and outcome accountability can affect the consumer decision-making process. Furthermore, this dissertation also explores the reasons behind the necessity of having to justify behaviors and possible decision-making biases arising from responsibility. To address the Research Questions, an experimental design was implemented through an online survey: participants were exposed to a purchase simulation and asked about their feelings towards that acquisition. Overall, 272 complete and valid answers were analyzed for the effects of satisfaction, accountability, justification activity, and confidence towards decision-making. Conclusions show that although there is a beneficial relationship between process accountability and decision satisfaction, this favorable effect cannot be generalized for all factors influencing purchases and deserves more in-depth and detailed analysis. Further, outcome accountability might be advantageous in certain circumstances. Limitations and future research suggestions are determined and explained at the end of this study.Responsabilidade é um elemento crucial para garantir a vida organizacional e social. Este conceito especifica quem deve reportar a quem e por que motivo, lidando com as expectativas dos indivíduos de terem de justificar os seus comportamentos e ações ao respetivo recetor. Como o tipo de responsabilidade pode influenciar o processo de tomada de decisão das mais variadas formas, o objetivo deste estudo é investigar como é que a responsabilidade no processo e no resultado pode afetar o processo de tomada de decisão do consumidor. Ademais, esta dissertação também explora as razões por detrás da necessidade de justificar comportamentos e dos possíveis enviesamentos da tomada de decisão resultantes da responsabilidade. Para adereçar as questões iniciais, foi implementado um design experimental através de um questionário online: os participantes foram expostos a uma simulação de uma compra e foram questionados acerca dos seus sentimentos em relação a essa aquisição. No geral foram analisadas 272 respostas completas e válidas, focadas nos efeitos da satisfação, responsabilidade, justificações e confiança na tomada de decisão. As conclusões mostram que apesar de haver uma relação benéfica entre a responsabilidade no processo e satisfação da decisão, este efeito favorável não pode ser generalizado para todos os fatores que influenciam o processo de compra e merece uma análise mais aprofundada e detalhada. Ademais, a responsabilidade no resultado pode ser vantajosa em certas circunstâncias. Limitações e sugestões para futura investigação são apresentadas e explicadas no final deste estudo.Fernandes, Daniel Von Der HeydeVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaGarção, Ana Carolina Martins2020-10-23T08:11:36Z2020-05-2620202020-05-26T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146TID:202516601enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:36:41Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/31146Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:25:04.989986Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
title The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
spellingShingle The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
Garção, Ana Carolina Martins
Accountability
Decision-making process
Consumer behavior
Need for justification
Decision-making biases
Overconfidence
Conformity
Responsabilidade
Processo de tomada de decisão
Comportamento do consumidor
Necessidade de justificação
Tomadas de decisão enviesadas
Excesso de confiança
Conformidade
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
title_full The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
title_fullStr The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
title_full_unstemmed The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
title_sort The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
author Garção, Ana Carolina Martins
author_facet Garção, Ana Carolina Martins
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Daniel Von Der Heyde
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garção, Ana Carolina Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Accountability
Decision-making process
Consumer behavior
Need for justification
Decision-making biases
Overconfidence
Conformity
Responsabilidade
Processo de tomada de decisão
Comportamento do consumidor
Necessidade de justificação
Tomadas de decisão enviesadas
Excesso de confiança
Conformidade
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Accountability
Decision-making process
Consumer behavior
Need for justification
Decision-making biases
Overconfidence
Conformity
Responsabilidade
Processo de tomada de decisão
Comportamento do consumidor
Necessidade de justificação
Tomadas de decisão enviesadas
Excesso de confiança
Conformidade
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description Accountability is a crucial element of organizational and social life. The concept specifies who must respond to whom and for what, dealing with agents’ expectations of having to justify their behaviors and actions to an accountable audience. As accountability type can influence the decision-making process in distinctive ways, the purpose of this study is to investigate how process and outcome accountability can affect the consumer decision-making process. Furthermore, this dissertation also explores the reasons behind the necessity of having to justify behaviors and possible decision-making biases arising from responsibility. To address the Research Questions, an experimental design was implemented through an online survey: participants were exposed to a purchase simulation and asked about their feelings towards that acquisition. Overall, 272 complete and valid answers were analyzed for the effects of satisfaction, accountability, justification activity, and confidence towards decision-making. Conclusions show that although there is a beneficial relationship between process accountability and decision satisfaction, this favorable effect cannot be generalized for all factors influencing purchases and deserves more in-depth and detailed analysis. Further, outcome accountability might be advantageous in certain circumstances. Limitations and future research suggestions are determined and explained at the end of this study.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-23T08:11:36Z
2020-05-26
2020
2020-05-26T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146
TID:202516601
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146
identifier_str_mv TID:202516601
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131964174761984