The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146 |
Resumo: | Accountability is a crucial element of organizational and social life. The concept specifies who must respond to whom and for what, dealing with agents’ expectations of having to justify their behaviors and actions to an accountable audience. As accountability type can influence the decision-making process in distinctive ways, the purpose of this study is to investigate how process and outcome accountability can affect the consumer decision-making process. Furthermore, this dissertation also explores the reasons behind the necessity of having to justify behaviors and possible decision-making biases arising from responsibility. To address the Research Questions, an experimental design was implemented through an online survey: participants were exposed to a purchase simulation and asked about their feelings towards that acquisition. Overall, 272 complete and valid answers were analyzed for the effects of satisfaction, accountability, justification activity, and confidence towards decision-making. Conclusions show that although there is a beneficial relationship between process accountability and decision satisfaction, this favorable effect cannot be generalized for all factors influencing purchases and deserves more in-depth and detailed analysis. Further, outcome accountability might be advantageous in certain circumstances. Limitations and future research suggestions are determined and explained at the end of this study. |
id |
RCAP_a3030f4907d82bbe6a7c974a9f035aa0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/31146 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making processAccountabilityDecision-making processConsumer behaviorNeed for justificationDecision-making biasesOverconfidenceConformityResponsabilidadeProcesso de tomada de decisãoComportamento do consumidorNecessidade de justificaçãoTomadas de decisão enviesadasExcesso de confiançaConformidadeDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoAccountability is a crucial element of organizational and social life. The concept specifies who must respond to whom and for what, dealing with agents’ expectations of having to justify their behaviors and actions to an accountable audience. As accountability type can influence the decision-making process in distinctive ways, the purpose of this study is to investigate how process and outcome accountability can affect the consumer decision-making process. Furthermore, this dissertation also explores the reasons behind the necessity of having to justify behaviors and possible decision-making biases arising from responsibility. To address the Research Questions, an experimental design was implemented through an online survey: participants were exposed to a purchase simulation and asked about their feelings towards that acquisition. Overall, 272 complete and valid answers were analyzed for the effects of satisfaction, accountability, justification activity, and confidence towards decision-making. Conclusions show that although there is a beneficial relationship between process accountability and decision satisfaction, this favorable effect cannot be generalized for all factors influencing purchases and deserves more in-depth and detailed analysis. Further, outcome accountability might be advantageous in certain circumstances. Limitations and future research suggestions are determined and explained at the end of this study.Responsabilidade é um elemento crucial para garantir a vida organizacional e social. Este conceito especifica quem deve reportar a quem e por que motivo, lidando com as expectativas dos indivíduos de terem de justificar os seus comportamentos e ações ao respetivo recetor. Como o tipo de responsabilidade pode influenciar o processo de tomada de decisão das mais variadas formas, o objetivo deste estudo é investigar como é que a responsabilidade no processo e no resultado pode afetar o processo de tomada de decisão do consumidor. Ademais, esta dissertação também explora as razões por detrás da necessidade de justificar comportamentos e dos possíveis enviesamentos da tomada de decisão resultantes da responsabilidade. Para adereçar as questões iniciais, foi implementado um design experimental através de um questionário online: os participantes foram expostos a uma simulação de uma compra e foram questionados acerca dos seus sentimentos em relação a essa aquisição. No geral foram analisadas 272 respostas completas e válidas, focadas nos efeitos da satisfação, responsabilidade, justificações e confiança na tomada de decisão. As conclusões mostram que apesar de haver uma relação benéfica entre a responsabilidade no processo e satisfação da decisão, este efeito favorável não pode ser generalizado para todos os fatores que influenciam o processo de compra e merece uma análise mais aprofundada e detalhada. Ademais, a responsabilidade no resultado pode ser vantajosa em certas circunstâncias. Limitações e sugestões para futura investigação são apresentadas e explicadas no final deste estudo.Fernandes, Daniel Von Der HeydeVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaGarção, Ana Carolina Martins2020-10-23T08:11:36Z2020-05-2620202020-05-26T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146TID:202516601enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:36:41Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/31146Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:25:04.989986Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process |
title |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process |
spellingShingle |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process Garção, Ana Carolina Martins Accountability Decision-making process Consumer behavior Need for justification Decision-making biases Overconfidence Conformity Responsabilidade Processo de tomada de decisão Comportamento do consumidor Necessidade de justificação Tomadas de decisão enviesadas Excesso de confiança Conformidade Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
title_short |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process |
title_full |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process |
title_fullStr |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process |
title_sort |
The effect of accountability type on the consumer decision-making process |
author |
Garção, Ana Carolina Martins |
author_facet |
Garção, Ana Carolina Martins |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Daniel Von Der Heyde Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garção, Ana Carolina Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Accountability Decision-making process Consumer behavior Need for justification Decision-making biases Overconfidence Conformity Responsabilidade Processo de tomada de decisão Comportamento do consumidor Necessidade de justificação Tomadas de decisão enviesadas Excesso de confiança Conformidade Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
topic |
Accountability Decision-making process Consumer behavior Need for justification Decision-making biases Overconfidence Conformity Responsabilidade Processo de tomada de decisão Comportamento do consumidor Necessidade de justificação Tomadas de decisão enviesadas Excesso de confiança Conformidade Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
description |
Accountability is a crucial element of organizational and social life. The concept specifies who must respond to whom and for what, dealing with agents’ expectations of having to justify their behaviors and actions to an accountable audience. As accountability type can influence the decision-making process in distinctive ways, the purpose of this study is to investigate how process and outcome accountability can affect the consumer decision-making process. Furthermore, this dissertation also explores the reasons behind the necessity of having to justify behaviors and possible decision-making biases arising from responsibility. To address the Research Questions, an experimental design was implemented through an online survey: participants were exposed to a purchase simulation and asked about their feelings towards that acquisition. Overall, 272 complete and valid answers were analyzed for the effects of satisfaction, accountability, justification activity, and confidence towards decision-making. Conclusions show that although there is a beneficial relationship between process accountability and decision satisfaction, this favorable effect cannot be generalized for all factors influencing purchases and deserves more in-depth and detailed analysis. Further, outcome accountability might be advantageous in certain circumstances. Limitations and future research suggestions are determined and explained at the end of this study. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-23T08:11:36Z 2020-05-26 2020 2020-05-26T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146 TID:202516601 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/31146 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202516601 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131964174761984 |