Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso, Paulo Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Taveira, Maria do Céu, Biscaia, Constança Sacadura, Santos, Maria Graça
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/20420
Resumo: In this study, we explored main dilemmas psychologists face in career counselling in two main professional settings: employment and education. Participants included 24 experienced Portuguese psychologists, working in employment (n = 14) and educational (n = 10) settings. We used consensual qualitative research to conduct and analyse semi-structured interviews. Results revealed dilemmas’ in five domains: neutrality, assessment, dual loyalty, role boundaries, and confidentiality, with the typical dilemma in the domain of neutrality. Differences between groups were found in the domains of dual loyalty and role boundaries.
id RCAP_a42f25c3670a54d71a687e62a89f7d1b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/20420
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practiceCareer counsellingDilemmasTranstheoreticalSocial SciencesIn this study, we explored main dilemmas psychologists face in career counselling in two main professional settings: employment and education. Participants included 24 experienced Portuguese psychologists, working in employment (n = 14) and educational (n = 10) settings. We used consensual qualitative research to conduct and analyse semi-structured interviews. Results revealed dilemmas’ in five domains: neutrality, assessment, dual loyalty, role boundaries, and confidentiality, with the typical dilemma in the domain of neutrality. Differences between groups were found in the domains of dual loyalty and role boundaries.Dans cette étude, nous avons exploré les principaux dilemmes rencontrés par les psychologues dans le conseil en orientation dans deux milieux professionnels centraux: le placement et l’éducation. Parmi les participants figuraient 24 psychologues portugais expérimentés travaillant dans des contextes de placement (n = 14) et d’éducation (n = 10). Nous avons utilisé la recherche qualitative consensuelle pour mener et analyser les entretiens semi-structurés. Les re´sultats ont révé lé des dilemmes dans cinq domaines: la neutralité, l’évaluation, la double loyauté, les limites du rôle, et la confidentialité, avec le dilemme typique dans le domaine de la neutralité. Les différences entre les groupes ont été identifiees dans les domaines de la double loyauté et les limites du rôle.In dieser Studie untersuchten wir die hauptsä chlichen Dilemmata, mit denen Psychologen in der Berufsberatung in zwei wesentlichen professionellen Einrichtungen konfrontiert sind: Beruf und Bildung. Zu den Teilnehmern geho ¨rten 24 erfahrene portugiesische Psychologen, die in Einrichtungen von Beruf (n = 14) und Bildung (n = 10) arbeiteten. Wir verwendeten einvernehmliche qualitative Forschung um semi-strukturierte Interviews durchzufu¨hren und zu analysieren. Die Ergebnisse zeigten Dilemmata in fünf Bereichen: Neutralität, Beurteilung, doppelte Loyalität, Rollengrenzen und Vertraulichkeit, mit dem typischen Dilemma in der Domäne der Neutralität. Unterschiede zwischen den Gruppen wurden in den Bereichen der doppelten Loyalität und Rollengrenzen gefunden.Springer Science+Business MediaUniversidade do MinhoCardoso, Paulo MiguelTaveira, Maria do CéuBiscaia, Constança SacaduraSantos, Maria Graça2012-10-112012-10-11T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/20420eng0251-251310.1007/s10775-012-9232-9http://www.springerlink.com/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:06:11Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/20420Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:56:47.138034Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
title Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
spellingShingle Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
Cardoso, Paulo Miguel
Career counselling
Dilemmas
Transtheoretical
Social Sciences
title_short Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
title_full Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
title_fullStr Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
title_full_unstemmed Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
title_sort Psychologists’ dilemmas in career counselling practice
author Cardoso, Paulo Miguel
author_facet Cardoso, Paulo Miguel
Taveira, Maria do Céu
Biscaia, Constança Sacadura
Santos, Maria Graça
author_role author
author2 Taveira, Maria do Céu
Biscaia, Constança Sacadura
Santos, Maria Graça
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso, Paulo Miguel
Taveira, Maria do Céu
Biscaia, Constança Sacadura
Santos, Maria Graça
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Career counselling
Dilemmas
Transtheoretical
Social Sciences
topic Career counselling
Dilemmas
Transtheoretical
Social Sciences
description In this study, we explored main dilemmas psychologists face in career counselling in two main professional settings: employment and education. Participants included 24 experienced Portuguese psychologists, working in employment (n = 14) and educational (n = 10) settings. We used consensual qualitative research to conduct and analyse semi-structured interviews. Results revealed dilemmas’ in five domains: neutrality, assessment, dual loyalty, role boundaries, and confidentiality, with the typical dilemma in the domain of neutrality. Differences between groups were found in the domains of dual loyalty and role boundaries.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-11
2012-10-11T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/20420
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/20420
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0251-2513
10.1007/s10775-012-9232-9
http://www.springerlink.com/
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Science+Business Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Science+Business Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132355382738944

Registros relacionados