Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota, Carolina Maria de Sá
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/152694
Resumo: With technological advances, the government and national organizations are concerned about the need to constantly adapt. Digital diplomacy is evolving quickly across all continents, so it is critical for a country like Portugal to be able to adapt its digital methods for international promotion. One of the most difficult challenges for diplomats is developing a message that is clear and in line with the goals of the government being represented. This section delves into the official Twitter pages of thirty different diplomats, and a comparison between Portugal, Ireland, and the United Kingdom is made using a quantitative and qualitative analysis of tweets.
id RCAP_a5746c0a87de0f8a80bf7e0592caaada
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/152694
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-Social networkTwitterDigital diplomacyForeign policyPublic diplomacyTwiplomacyDiplomatDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoWith technological advances, the government and national organizations are concerned about the need to constantly adapt. Digital diplomacy is evolving quickly across all continents, so it is critical for a country like Portugal to be able to adapt its digital methods for international promotion. One of the most difficult challenges for diplomats is developing a message that is clear and in line with the goals of the government being represented. This section delves into the official Twitter pages of thirty different diplomats, and a comparison between Portugal, Ireland, and the United Kingdom is made using a quantitative and qualitative analysis of tweets.Martins, PedroGaspar, JoanaRUNMota, Carolina Maria de Sá2023-05-12T14:11:09Z2022-10-042022-10-042022-10-04T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/152694TID:203222636enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:35:05Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/152694Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:55:02.284160Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
title Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
spellingShingle Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
Mota, Carolina Maria de Sá
Social network
Twitter
Digital diplomacy
Foreign policy
Public diplomacy
Twiplomacy
Diplomat
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
title_full Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
title_fullStr Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
title_full_unstemmed Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
title_sort Digital public diplomacy at the portuguese ministry of foreign affairs: diplomats- behavior on social platforms - cross country comparison between portuguese, British and Irish diplomats - the case of twitter-
author Mota, Carolina Maria de Sá
author_facet Mota, Carolina Maria de Sá
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Martins, Pedro
Gaspar, Joana
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota, Carolina Maria de Sá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social network
Twitter
Digital diplomacy
Foreign policy
Public diplomacy
Twiplomacy
Diplomat
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Social network
Twitter
Digital diplomacy
Foreign policy
Public diplomacy
Twiplomacy
Diplomat
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description With technological advances, the government and national organizations are concerned about the need to constantly adapt. Digital diplomacy is evolving quickly across all continents, so it is critical for a country like Portugal to be able to adapt its digital methods for international promotion. One of the most difficult challenges for diplomats is developing a message that is clear and in line with the goals of the government being represented. This section delves into the official Twitter pages of thirty different diplomats, and a comparison between Portugal, Ireland, and the United Kingdom is made using a quantitative and qualitative analysis of tweets.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-04
2022-10-04
2022-10-04T00:00:00Z
2023-05-12T14:11:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/152694
TID:203222636
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/152694
identifier_str_mv TID:203222636
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138138038206464