Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chen, Binli
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: He, Hailan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2810
Resumo: China’s rank falling in the Global Gender Gap Index of the World Economic Forum has aroused the domestic scholar’s controversy. Based on the data provided by the Global Gender Gap Report, this article will describe the gender inequality in China by comparing its overall index scores and scores in the fields of economic participation and opportunity, education attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment with other countries, and then examining the reasons for China’s falling in rank through the score changes of sub-dimensions and indicators. Analysis of the data suggests that China has not kept up with the rate of improvement in the overall index, and in the four fields, compared to the original 112 countries, the upper-middle income countries, and the Asian and Pacific countries. Over the 13 years covered by the report, China’s score experienced a rapid improvement from 2006 to 2009 and a decline after 2013. China’s high sex ratio at birth, further expansion of gender inequality in active life expectancy, and an enlarged gender gap in secondary education caused China’s lagging overall score and ranking. In addition, the inclusion of measures such as secondary education enrollment, political empowerment, and other indicators also led to the backward ranking of China to some extent.
id RCAP_af67db8ce8b28685340b27e6665b2fd2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2810
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap IndexChina; gender gap; gender inequalityChina’s rank falling in the Global Gender Gap Index of the World Economic Forum has aroused the domestic scholar’s controversy. Based on the data provided by the Global Gender Gap Report, this article will describe the gender inequality in China by comparing its overall index scores and scores in the fields of economic participation and opportunity, education attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment with other countries, and then examining the reasons for China’s falling in rank through the score changes of sub-dimensions and indicators. Analysis of the data suggests that China has not kept up with the rate of improvement in the overall index, and in the four fields, compared to the original 112 countries, the upper-middle income countries, and the Asian and Pacific countries. Over the 13 years covered by the report, China’s score experienced a rapid improvement from 2006 to 2009 and a decline after 2013. China’s high sex ratio at birth, further expansion of gender inequality in active life expectancy, and an enlarged gender gap in secondary education caused China’s lagging overall score and ranking. In addition, the inclusion of measures such as secondary education enrollment, political empowerment, and other indicators also led to the backward ranking of China to some extent.Cogitatio2020-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2810oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2810Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Left Behind? Women’s Status in Contemporary China; 10-222183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2810https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2810https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2810/2810Copyright (c) 2020 Binli Chen, Hailan Hehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChen, BinliHe, Hailan2022-12-20T11:00:14Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2810Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:39.119384Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
title Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
spellingShingle Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
Chen, Binli
China; gender gap; gender inequality
title_short Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
title_full Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
title_fullStr Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
title_full_unstemmed Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
title_sort Falling behind the Rest? China and the Gender Gap Index
author Chen, Binli
author_facet Chen, Binli
He, Hailan
author_role author
author2 He, Hailan
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chen, Binli
He, Hailan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv China; gender gap; gender inequality
topic China; gender gap; gender inequality
description China’s rank falling in the Global Gender Gap Index of the World Economic Forum has aroused the domestic scholar’s controversy. Based on the data provided by the Global Gender Gap Report, this article will describe the gender inequality in China by comparing its overall index scores and scores in the fields of economic participation and opportunity, education attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment with other countries, and then examining the reasons for China’s falling in rank through the score changes of sub-dimensions and indicators. Analysis of the data suggests that China has not kept up with the rate of improvement in the overall index, and in the four fields, compared to the original 112 countries, the upper-middle income countries, and the Asian and Pacific countries. Over the 13 years covered by the report, China’s score experienced a rapid improvement from 2006 to 2009 and a decline after 2013. China’s high sex ratio at birth, further expansion of gender inequality in active life expectancy, and an enlarged gender gap in secondary education caused China’s lagging overall score and ranking. In addition, the inclusion of measures such as secondary education enrollment, political empowerment, and other indicators also led to the backward ranking of China to some extent.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2810
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2810
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2810
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2810
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2810
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2810
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2810/2810
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Binli Chen, Hailan He
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Binli Chen, Hailan He
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Left Behind? Women’s Status in Contemporary China; 10-22
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130663547305984