O apadrinhamento civil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/104099 |
Resumo: | This dissertation is about Civil Sponsorship, that was established in Portugal 10 years ago, through the Law 103/2009. This new juridical instrument, has tried, since its law proposal, to be an alternative to the institutionalization of children and minors. The legislator created a legal regime that was more flexible, in comparison to other solutions, and inspired himself on the traditional godfather role. One could say that Civil Sponsorship occupied the spot left empty by the elimination of restricted adoption, through Law 143/2015. However, Civil Sponsorship never truly replaced it, as it does not involve the creation of an adoptive filiation, but rather that of a new juridical relationship, between godfather and godson. This relationship, of expectedly permanent nature, is established between a minor and a person or family, that will be in charge of the parental responsibilities, creating bonds of affection that potentiate the development and well-being of the minor. Civil sponsorship has not had, during the 10 years of its existence, the results expected as a solution against institutionalization, registering less than 30 children that ceased the situation of institutionalization due to it. The reasons behind this ineffectiveness, which this dissertation explores, can be found on the lack of publicization of the new regime to the general public and to the relevant institutions, on the regime’s characteristics that jeopardize the motivation of prospect godfathers and on the financial support provided to godfathers, so that they fulfill their role to provide for their godson. |
id |
RCAP_afeb2d516e6cb6fae128604391ae0fcb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/104099 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
O apadrinhamento civilanálise ao seu regime jurídico e comentário à sua eficácia, até agora, em PortugalDireitoThis dissertation is about Civil Sponsorship, that was established in Portugal 10 years ago, through the Law 103/2009. This new juridical instrument, has tried, since its law proposal, to be an alternative to the institutionalization of children and minors. The legislator created a legal regime that was more flexible, in comparison to other solutions, and inspired himself on the traditional godfather role. One could say that Civil Sponsorship occupied the spot left empty by the elimination of restricted adoption, through Law 143/2015. However, Civil Sponsorship never truly replaced it, as it does not involve the creation of an adoptive filiation, but rather that of a new juridical relationship, between godfather and godson. This relationship, of expectedly permanent nature, is established between a minor and a person or family, that will be in charge of the parental responsibilities, creating bonds of affection that potentiate the development and well-being of the minor. Civil sponsorship has not had, during the 10 years of its existence, the results expected as a solution against institutionalization, registering less than 30 children that ceased the situation of institutionalization due to it. The reasons behind this ineffectiveness, which this dissertation explores, can be found on the lack of publicization of the new regime to the general public and to the relevant institutions, on the regime’s characteristics that jeopardize the motivation of prospect godfathers and on the financial support provided to godfathers, so that they fulfill their role to provide for their godson.Esta tese de mestrado é sobre o apadrinhamento civil, que entrou em vigor em Portugal há 10 anos através da Lei n.º 103/2009. Este novo instrumento jurídico, desde a proposta de Lei de que nasce, procura ser uma alternativa à institucionalização de crianças e jovens. O legislador criou um regime jurídico mais flexível do que as demais soluções, e inspirou-se para tanto na figura tradicional do padrinho religioso. Poderá dizer-se que o apadrinhamento civil veio ocupar o lugar vazio pouco tempo depois deixado pela eliminação da figura da adoção restrita, através da Lei n.º 143/2015. No entanto, o apadrinhamento civil nunca substitui a adoção restrita, pois não constitui laços de filiação adotiva, mas cria, sim, uma relação jurídica nova, a de padrinho e afilhado. Esta relação jurídica, que se prevê de carácter permanente, estabelece-se entre uma criança ou jovem e uma pessoa ou família que fique encarregue das responsabilidades parentais, e entre as quais se estabeleçam laços afetivos que potenciem o desenvolvimento e a qualidade de vida da pessoa apadrinhada. O apadrinhamento civil não teve, ao longo da sua duração de 10 anos, o resultado esperado enquanto solução para a desinstitucionalização, registando menos de 30 crianças que cessaram o acolhimento residencial/familiar. As razões para a sua fraca eficácia, que este trabalho procura explorar, podem encontrar-se na fraca divulgação da medida, no seio das instituições relevantes; nas características do regime que prejudicam as motivações para apadrinhar, e, finalmente, na falta de apoio financeiro que é dado aos padrinhos para que cumpram o seu papel e providenciem o sustento do afilhado.Assis, ZamiraRUNPassinhas, Inês Maria Monteiro2020-09-15T14:37:43Z2020-07-212020-062020-07-21T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/104099TID:202505952porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:49:38Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/104099Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:40:08.336046Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
O apadrinhamento civil análise ao seu regime jurídico e comentário à sua eficácia, até agora, em Portugal |
title |
O apadrinhamento civil |
spellingShingle |
O apadrinhamento civil Passinhas, Inês Maria Monteiro Direito |
title_short |
O apadrinhamento civil |
title_full |
O apadrinhamento civil |
title_fullStr |
O apadrinhamento civil |
title_full_unstemmed |
O apadrinhamento civil |
title_sort |
O apadrinhamento civil |
author |
Passinhas, Inês Maria Monteiro |
author_facet |
Passinhas, Inês Maria Monteiro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Assis, Zamira RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Passinhas, Inês Maria Monteiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito |
topic |
Direito |
description |
This dissertation is about Civil Sponsorship, that was established in Portugal 10 years ago, through the Law 103/2009. This new juridical instrument, has tried, since its law proposal, to be an alternative to the institutionalization of children and minors. The legislator created a legal regime that was more flexible, in comparison to other solutions, and inspired himself on the traditional godfather role. One could say that Civil Sponsorship occupied the spot left empty by the elimination of restricted adoption, through Law 143/2015. However, Civil Sponsorship never truly replaced it, as it does not involve the creation of an adoptive filiation, but rather that of a new juridical relationship, between godfather and godson. This relationship, of expectedly permanent nature, is established between a minor and a person or family, that will be in charge of the parental responsibilities, creating bonds of affection that potentiate the development and well-being of the minor. Civil sponsorship has not had, during the 10 years of its existence, the results expected as a solution against institutionalization, registering less than 30 children that ceased the situation of institutionalization due to it. The reasons behind this ineffectiveness, which this dissertation explores, can be found on the lack of publicization of the new regime to the general public and to the relevant institutions, on the regime’s characteristics that jeopardize the motivation of prospect godfathers and on the financial support provided to godfathers, so that they fulfill their role to provide for their godson. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-15T14:37:43Z 2020-07-21 2020-06 2020-07-21T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/104099 TID:202505952 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/104099 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202505952 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138017283145728 |