Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v8i1.3364 |
Resumo: | This paper analyzes the CTS approach to proposals for High School Science classes developed by prospective teachers of a Brazilian public University. The teacher education occurred during the disciplines of Teaching Practice of Chemistry and Physics, in 2015. In this course, prospective teachers developed class plan as a training proposal, based on Science, Technology and Society approach (STS) for Brazilian High School Science class. The analysis was based on Lufti ‘s categories of contextualization, assessing whether the proposals were limited to only motivate or illustrate; or problematize and integrate scientific concepts with social and technological issues; if excluded environmental issues economic, social and political, or, if they did emerge the extraordinary. The analysis was complemented by assumptions of qualitative research methodology for data extracted from teachers’ and researcher’s field notes who accompanied the discipline. The results indicate some proposals favoring scientific content explaining everyday facts, but without relating them to the social issues. Still others brought scientific content and superficially explored more social, political, technological or economical issues. Another group showed better balance between scientific, social, and technological content, using scientific knowledge for dealing with issues in the light of social and technological context. It was also noted that the categories of Lufti are not sufficient for a broader analysis of prospective teachers learning as there are elements of the educational process that they are not geared to contemplate. The results made it possible to review some aspects of the discipline. |
id |
RCAP_b07f1f1593578bd80156e946685d157e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/3364 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science DegreeDesenvolvimento de abordagens CTS por discentes de uma licenciatura em ciênciasThis paper analyzes the CTS approach to proposals for High School Science classes developed by prospective teachers of a Brazilian public University. The teacher education occurred during the disciplines of Teaching Practice of Chemistry and Physics, in 2015. In this course, prospective teachers developed class plan as a training proposal, based on Science, Technology and Society approach (STS) for Brazilian High School Science class. The analysis was based on Lufti ‘s categories of contextualization, assessing whether the proposals were limited to only motivate or illustrate; or problematize and integrate scientific concepts with social and technological issues; if excluded environmental issues economic, social and political, or, if they did emerge the extraordinary. The analysis was complemented by assumptions of qualitative research methodology for data extracted from teachers’ and researcher’s field notes who accompanied the discipline. The results indicate some proposals favoring scientific content explaining everyday facts, but without relating them to the social issues. Still others brought scientific content and superficially explored more social, political, technological or economical issues. Another group showed better balance between scientific, social, and technological content, using scientific knowledge for dealing with issues in the light of social and technological context. It was also noted that the categories of Lufti are not sufficient for a broader analysis of prospective teachers learning as there are elements of the educational process that they are not geared to contemplate. The results made it possible to review some aspects of the discipline.Este trabajo analiza las propuestas de enfoque de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS) para las clases de Física y Química en la escuela secundaria, desarrolladas por los alumnos de un curso de Grado en Ciencias- Licenciatura, de una universidad pública brasileña. La formación se llevó a cabo en las asignaturas de Prácticas Pedagógicas de Física y Química, en 2015, cuando los futuros profesores planificaron una serie de clases elaboradas sobre el enfoque CTS. La metodología de análisis se basó en las categorías de contextualización de M. Lufti, evaluando si las propuestas se limitaban solamente a motivar y/o a ilustrar; si promoverían una problematización en la integración de los conceptos científicos, cuestiones sociales y tecnológicas; si se excluirían los temas ambientales, económicos, sociales y políticos; o aún, si hiciesen surgir lo extraordinario. El análisis fue complementado de acuerdo con los supuestos de la metodología de investigación cualitativa, de los datos extraídos de las notas de campo de los maestros y del investigador que acompañó a la asignatura. Los resultados indican algunas propuestas que favorecen el contenido científico explicando hechos cotidianos, sin embargo, estos no fueron relacionados con los problemas sociales. Otros trajeron contenidos superficialmente científicos y exploraron más los aspectos sociales, políticos, tecnológicos o económicos. Otro grupo presentó un mejor equilibrio entre los contenidos científicos, sociales y tecnológicos, utilizando los conocimientos científicos para hacer frente a las situaciones problemáticas en función del contexto social y tecnológico. Se observó también que lascategorías de Lufti no son suficientes para un análisis más amplio del aprendizaje de los estudiantes, ya que hay elementos del proceso educativo que no contempla. Los resultados han permitido revisar algunos aspectos de la disciplina.Este trabalho analisa as propostas da abordagem Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS) para as aulas de Química e Física no Ensino Médio, desenvolvidas por discentes de um curso de Graduação em Ciências - Licenciatura, de uma universidade pública brasileira. A formação deu-se nas disciplinas de Práticas Pedagógicas de Química e Física, em 2015, quando os futuros professores elaboraram uma sequência de aulas com o enfoque na abordagem CTS. A metodologia de análise pautou-se nas categorias de contextualização de M. Lufti, avaliando se as propostas limitavamse a apenas motivar e/ou ilustrar; se promoveriam uma problematização integrando conceitos científicos, questões sociais e tecnológicas; se excluíam questões ambientais econômicas, sociais e politicas, ou ainda, se faziam emergir o extraordinário. A análise foi complementada, mediante pressupostos da metodologia qualitativa de pesquisa, por meio de dados extraídos das notas de campo das professoras e da pesquisadora que acompanhou a disciplina. Os resultados indicam algumas propostas privilegiando conteúdos científicos que explicam fatos cotidianos, porém, sem relacioná-los às questões sociais. Outras propostas trouxeram conteúdos científicos abordados superficialmente e exploraram sobretudo questões sociais, políticas, tecnológicas ou econômicas. Um outro grupo apresentou maior equilíbrio entre os conteúdos científicos sociais e tecnológicos, utilizando o conhecimento científico para o enfrentamento de situações problemáticas, em função do contexto social e tecnológico. Observou-se, ainda, que as categorias de Lufti não são suficientes para uma análise mais ampla do aprendizado dos alunos, pois há elementos do processo formativo que elas não contemplam. Os resultados obtidos possibilitaram a revisão de alguns aspectos da disciplina.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2016-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v8i1.3364https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v8i1.3364Indagatio Didactica; Vol 8 No 1 (2016); 534-555Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2016); 534-555Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 8 No 1 (2016); 534-555Indagatio Didactica; vol. 8 n.º 1 (2016); 534-5551647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3364https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3364/2644Aragão, Susan Bruna CarneiroForato, Thaís Cyrino De MelloMartorano, Simone Alves De AssisBorges, Danielle Beatriz De Sousainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-22T10:15:19Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/3364Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:01.536237Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree Desenvolvimento de abordagens CTS por discentes de uma licenciatura em ciências |
title |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree |
spellingShingle |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree Aragão, Susan Bruna Carneiro |
title_short |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree |
title_full |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree |
title_fullStr |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree |
title_sort |
Development of STS approaches by students of a Science Degree |
author |
Aragão, Susan Bruna Carneiro |
author_facet |
Aragão, Susan Bruna Carneiro Forato, Thaís Cyrino De Mello Martorano, Simone Alves De Assis Borges, Danielle Beatriz De Sousa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Forato, Thaís Cyrino De Mello Martorano, Simone Alves De Assis Borges, Danielle Beatriz De Sousa |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aragão, Susan Bruna Carneiro Forato, Thaís Cyrino De Mello Martorano, Simone Alves De Assis Borges, Danielle Beatriz De Sousa |
description |
This paper analyzes the CTS approach to proposals for High School Science classes developed by prospective teachers of a Brazilian public University. The teacher education occurred during the disciplines of Teaching Practice of Chemistry and Physics, in 2015. In this course, prospective teachers developed class plan as a training proposal, based on Science, Technology and Society approach (STS) for Brazilian High School Science class. The analysis was based on Lufti ‘s categories of contextualization, assessing whether the proposals were limited to only motivate or illustrate; or problematize and integrate scientific concepts with social and technological issues; if excluded environmental issues economic, social and political, or, if they did emerge the extraordinary. The analysis was complemented by assumptions of qualitative research methodology for data extracted from teachers’ and researcher’s field notes who accompanied the discipline. The results indicate some proposals favoring scientific content explaining everyday facts, but without relating them to the social issues. Still others brought scientific content and superficially explored more social, political, technological or economical issues. Another group showed better balance between scientific, social, and technological content, using scientific knowledge for dealing with issues in the light of social and technological context. It was also noted that the categories of Lufti are not sufficient for a broader analysis of prospective teachers learning as there are elements of the educational process that they are not geared to contemplate. The results made it possible to review some aspects of the discipline. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v8i1.3364 https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v8i1.3364 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v8i1.3364 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3364 https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/3364/2644 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Indagatio Didactica; Vol 8 No 1 (2016); 534-555 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2016); 534-555 Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 8 No 1 (2016); 534-555 Indagatio Didactica; vol. 8 n.º 1 (2016); 534-555 1647-3582 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133567853264896 |