Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590 |
Resumo: | Animal use in medical research is widely accepted on the basis that it may help to save human lives and improve their quality. Recently, however, objections have been made specifically to the use of animals in scientific investigation of human obesity. This paper discusses two arguments for the view that this form of animal use, unlike some other forms of animal-based medical research, cannot be defended. The first argument leans heavily on the notion that people themselves are responsible for developing obesity and so-called ‘lifestyle’ diseases; the second involves the claim that animal studies of obesity’s causes and therapies distract attention from preventive efforts. Drawing on both empirical data and moral reasoning, we argue that the relevant attributions of responsibility and claims about distraction are not plausible, and that therefore there is no reason to single out the use of animals in obesity research as especially problematic. |
id |
RCAP_b223e66d7c116a8535362776162604ac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/102590 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity researchAnimal ExperimentationAnimalsDisease ModelsEthicsAnimal use in medical research is widely accepted on the basis that it may help to save human lives and improve their quality. Recently, however, objections have been made specifically to the use of animals in scientific investigation of human obesity. This paper discusses two arguments for the view that this form of animal use, unlike some other forms of animal-based medical research, cannot be defended. The first argument leans heavily on the notion that people themselves are responsible for developing obesity and so-called ‘lifestyle’ diseases; the second involves the claim that animal studies of obesity’s causes and therapies distract attention from preventive efforts. Drawing on both empirical data and moral reasoning, we argue that the relevant attributions of responsibility and claims about distraction are not plausible, and that therefore there is no reason to single out the use of animals in obesity research as especially problematic.BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE2014-052014-05-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590eng0306-680010.1136/medethics-2011-100368Lund, TBSørensen, TIAOlsson, IASHansen, AKSandøe, Pinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:54:58Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/102590Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:11:30.227472Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research |
title |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research |
spellingShingle |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research Lund, TB Animal Experimentation Animals Disease Models Ethics |
title_short |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research |
title_full |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research |
title_fullStr |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research |
title_sort |
Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research |
author |
Lund, TB |
author_facet |
Lund, TB Sørensen, TIA Olsson, IAS Hansen, AK Sandøe, P |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sørensen, TIA Olsson, IAS Hansen, AK Sandøe, P |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lund, TB Sørensen, TIA Olsson, IAS Hansen, AK Sandøe, P |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal Experimentation Animals Disease Models Ethics |
topic |
Animal Experimentation Animals Disease Models Ethics |
description |
Animal use in medical research is widely accepted on the basis that it may help to save human lives and improve their quality. Recently, however, objections have been made specifically to the use of animals in scientific investigation of human obesity. This paper discusses two arguments for the view that this form of animal use, unlike some other forms of animal-based medical research, cannot be defended. The first argument leans heavily on the notion that people themselves are responsible for developing obesity and so-called ‘lifestyle’ diseases; the second involves the claim that animal studies of obesity’s causes and therapies distract attention from preventive efforts. Drawing on both empirical data and moral reasoning, we argue that the relevant attributions of responsibility and claims about distraction are not plausible, and that therefore there is no reason to single out the use of animals in obesity research as especially problematic. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-05 2014-05-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0306-6800 10.1136/medethics-2011-100368 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136037867356160 |