Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lund, TB
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Sørensen, TIA, Olsson, IAS, Hansen, AK, Sandøe, P
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590
Resumo: Animal use in medical research is widely accepted on the basis that it may help to save human lives and improve their quality. Recently, however, objections have been made specifically to the use of animals in scientific investigation of human obesity. This paper discusses two arguments for the view that this form of animal use, unlike some other forms of animal-based medical research, cannot be defended. The first argument leans heavily on the notion that people themselves are responsible for developing obesity and so-called ‘lifestyle’ diseases; the second involves the claim that animal studies of obesity’s causes and therapies distract attention from preventive efforts. Drawing on both empirical data and moral reasoning, we argue that the relevant attributions of responsibility and claims about distraction are not plausible, and that therefore there is no reason to single out the use of animals in obesity research as especially problematic.
id RCAP_b223e66d7c116a8535362776162604ac
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/102590
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity researchAnimal ExperimentationAnimalsDisease ModelsEthicsAnimal use in medical research is widely accepted on the basis that it may help to save human lives and improve their quality. Recently, however, objections have been made specifically to the use of animals in scientific investigation of human obesity. This paper discusses two arguments for the view that this form of animal use, unlike some other forms of animal-based medical research, cannot be defended. The first argument leans heavily on the notion that people themselves are responsible for developing obesity and so-called ‘lifestyle’ diseases; the second involves the claim that animal studies of obesity’s causes and therapies distract attention from preventive efforts. Drawing on both empirical data and moral reasoning, we argue that the relevant attributions of responsibility and claims about distraction are not plausible, and that therefore there is no reason to single out the use of animals in obesity research as especially problematic.BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE2014-052014-05-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590eng0306-680010.1136/medethics-2011-100368Lund, TBSørensen, TIAOlsson, IASHansen, AKSandøe, Pinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:54:58Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/102590Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:11:30.227472Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
title Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
spellingShingle Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
Lund, TB
Animal Experimentation
Animals
Disease Models
Ethics
title_short Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
title_full Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
title_fullStr Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
title_full_unstemmed Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
title_sort Is it acceptable to use animals to model obese humans? - A critical discussion of two arguments against the use of animals in obesity research
author Lund, TB
author_facet Lund, TB
Sørensen, TIA
Olsson, IAS
Hansen, AK
Sandøe, P
author_role author
author2 Sørensen, TIA
Olsson, IAS
Hansen, AK
Sandøe, P
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lund, TB
Sørensen, TIA
Olsson, IAS
Hansen, AK
Sandøe, P
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animal Experimentation
Animals
Disease Models
Ethics
topic Animal Experimentation
Animals
Disease Models
Ethics
description Animal use in medical research is widely accepted on the basis that it may help to save human lives and improve their quality. Recently, however, objections have been made specifically to the use of animals in scientific investigation of human obesity. This paper discusses two arguments for the view that this form of animal use, unlike some other forms of animal-based medical research, cannot be defended. The first argument leans heavily on the notion that people themselves are responsible for developing obesity and so-called ‘lifestyle’ diseases; the second involves the claim that animal studies of obesity’s causes and therapies distract attention from preventive efforts. Drawing on both empirical data and moral reasoning, we argue that the relevant attributions of responsibility and claims about distraction are not plausible, and that therefore there is no reason to single out the use of animals in obesity research as especially problematic.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-05
2014-05-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590
url http://hdl.handle.net/10216/102590
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0306-6800
10.1136/medethics-2011-100368
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136037867356160