Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/27340 |
Resumo: | This study explores innovative ways for promoting and assessing the effectiveness of teachers’ written formative feedback in the context of undergraduate studies. The investigation entails close collaboration with one Biology teacher in the context of teaching ‘evolution’. One of the particular challenges was to encourage 88 first-year biology undergraduates to produce critical analyses of a selected press release related to the topic of evolution (i.e., the advent of genetic diseases). The research approach is based on a critical social paradigm, assuming principles of actionresearch. All written documents produced by participants and semi-structured interviews (at the end of the semester) were used as part of the content analysis of data. Results show that the teacher’s written comments increased opportunities for students to search for further information, negotiate and take decisions within their group, auto- and hetero-reflect before sending their critical analyses to the teacher. |
id |
RCAP_b6895f659b49854c368d8e615d24b6a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/27340 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case studyWritten formative feedbackCritical thinkingHigher educationThis study explores innovative ways for promoting and assessing the effectiveness of teachers’ written formative feedback in the context of undergraduate studies. The investigation entails close collaboration with one Biology teacher in the context of teaching ‘evolution’. One of the particular challenges was to encourage 88 first-year biology undergraduates to produce critical analyses of a selected press release related to the topic of evolution (i.e., the advent of genetic diseases). The research approach is based on a critical social paradigm, assuming principles of actionresearch. All written documents produced by participants and semi-structured interviews (at the end of the semester) were used as part of the content analysis of data. Results show that the teacher’s written comments increased opportunities for students to search for further information, negotiate and take decisions within their group, auto- and hetero-reflect before sending their critical analyses to the teacher.Mauritius Institute of Education2020-01-23T16:05:15Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/27340engPedrosa-de-Jesus, HelenaGuerra, Cecíliainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T11:52:56Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/27340Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:00:07.847967Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study |
title |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study |
spellingShingle |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study Pedrosa-de-Jesus, Helena Written formative feedback Critical thinking Higher education |
title_short |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study |
title_full |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study |
title_fullStr |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study |
title_sort |
Teachers’ written formative feedback on students’ critical thinking: A case study |
author |
Pedrosa-de-Jesus, Helena |
author_facet |
Pedrosa-de-Jesus, Helena Guerra, Cecília |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guerra, Cecília |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pedrosa-de-Jesus, Helena Guerra, Cecília |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Written formative feedback Critical thinking Higher education |
topic |
Written formative feedback Critical thinking Higher education |
description |
This study explores innovative ways for promoting and assessing the effectiveness of teachers’ written formative feedback in the context of undergraduate studies. The investigation entails close collaboration with one Biology teacher in the context of teaching ‘evolution’. One of the particular challenges was to encourage 88 first-year biology undergraduates to produce critical analyses of a selected press release related to the topic of evolution (i.e., the advent of genetic diseases). The research approach is based on a critical social paradigm, assuming principles of actionresearch. All written documents produced by participants and semi-structured interviews (at the end of the semester) were used as part of the content analysis of data. Results show that the teacher’s written comments increased opportunities for students to search for further information, negotiate and take decisions within their group, auto- and hetero-reflect before sending their critical analyses to the teacher. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z 2018 2020-01-23T16:05:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/27340 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/27340 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Mauritius Institute of Education |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Mauritius Institute of Education |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137655810686976 |