Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dines, Ilya
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.4000/medievalista.3867
Resumo: In this paper, I investigate the relationship between the text and the images in medieval Latin bestiary manuscripts. Medieval bestiaries, which are derived from the ancient Physiologus, comprise a nearly 1800-year-old tradition and have spawned several hundreds of copies throughout Europe, including a smaller subset of Latin bestiaries. Summarizing the first ever comprehensive analysis of the entire corpus of Latin bestiaries, this paper examines the patterns of deviations, or exceptions from the rigorous canon governing bestiary illustrations. I use the deviations to investigate the relationship between the work of the scribe and that of the artist in the production of bestiary manuscripts in order to determine to what extent medieval artists used already existing illustrations, and, conversely, when and to what extent they were willing or able to deviate from the canon. In the latter case, I try to explore the artist’s possible motivations, as well as the reasons for choosing specific motifs.   Bibliography BRODEUR, Arthur G. – “The Grateful Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 39 (1924), pp. 485-524. BROWN, Arthur C. – “The Knight of the Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 20 (1905), pp. 673-706. CLARK, Willene B. – A Medieval Book of Beasts: The Second-Family Bestiary. Commentary, Art, Text and Translation, Woodbridge: Boydell, 2006. CURLEY, Michael – Physiologus: A Medieval Book of Nature Lore. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1979. DINES, llya – “The Hare and its Alter Ego in the Middle Ages”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society 17 (2004), pp. 73–84. DINES, Ilya – “The Problem of the Transitional Family of Bestiaries”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society (2013), pp. 29-52.
id RCAP_c4050a68c1399846a9ac8615b3f76581
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.medteste.fcsh.unl.pt:article/121
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Producing the Bestiary: From Text to ImageProduzindo o bestiário: do texto à imagemPhysiologusBestiariesDeviationsManuscriptsImagesPhysiologusBestiáriosDesviosManuscritosImagensIn this paper, I investigate the relationship between the text and the images in medieval Latin bestiary manuscripts. Medieval bestiaries, which are derived from the ancient Physiologus, comprise a nearly 1800-year-old tradition and have spawned several hundreds of copies throughout Europe, including a smaller subset of Latin bestiaries. Summarizing the first ever comprehensive analysis of the entire corpus of Latin bestiaries, this paper examines the patterns of deviations, or exceptions from the rigorous canon governing bestiary illustrations. I use the deviations to investigate the relationship between the work of the scribe and that of the artist in the production of bestiary manuscripts in order to determine to what extent medieval artists used already existing illustrations, and, conversely, when and to what extent they were willing or able to deviate from the canon. In the latter case, I try to explore the artist’s possible motivations, as well as the reasons for choosing specific motifs.   Bibliography BRODEUR, Arthur G. – “The Grateful Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 39 (1924), pp. 485-524. BROWN, Arthur C. – “The Knight of the Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 20 (1905), pp. 673-706. CLARK, Willene B. – A Medieval Book of Beasts: The Second-Family Bestiary. Commentary, Art, Text and Translation, Woodbridge: Boydell, 2006. CURLEY, Michael – Physiologus: A Medieval Book of Nature Lore. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1979. DINES, llya – “The Hare and its Alter Ego in the Middle Ages”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society 17 (2004), pp. 73–84. DINES, Ilya – “The Problem of the Transitional Family of Bestiaries”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society (2013), pp. 29-52.Neste artigo, investigo a relação entre o texto e as imagens nos bestiários latinos medievais. Os bestiários medievais, derivados do antigo Physiologus, remontam a uma tradição de quase 1800 anos e geraram várias centenas de cópias em toda a Europa, incluindo um subconjunto menor de bestiários latinos. Resumindo a primeira análise abrangente de todo o corpus de bestiários latinos, este artigo examina os padrões de desvios ou exceções do cânone que rege as ilustrações de bestiários. Eu analiso os desvios para investigar a relação entre o trabalho do escriba e o do artista na produção de manuscritos bestiários, a fim de determinar em que medida os artistas medievais usavam ilustrações já existentes e, inversamente, quando e em que medida estavam dispostos, ou capazes, a desviarem-se do cânone. Neste último caso, procuro explorar as possíveis motivações do artista, bem como as razões para a escolha de motivos específicos.   Referências bibliográficas BRODEUR, Arthur G. – “The Grateful Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 39 (1924), pp. 485-524. BROWN, Arthur C. – “The Knight of the Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 20 (1905), pp. 673-706. CLARK, Willene B. – A Medieval Book of Beasts: The Second-Family Bestiary. Commentary, Art, Text and Translation, Woodbridge: Boydell, 2006. CURLEY, Michael – Physiologus: A Medieval Book of Nature Lore. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1979. DINES, llya – “The Hare and its Alter Ego in the Middle Ages”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society 17 (2004), pp. 73–84. DINES, Ilya – “The Problem of the Transitional Family of Bestiaries”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society (2013), pp. 29-52.IEM - Instituto de Estudos Medievais2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.4000/medievalista.3867https://doi.org/10.4000/medievalista.3867Medievalista; No 29 (2021): Medievalista - "The Medieval Bestiary" Monograph; 91-116Medievalista; No 29 (2021): Medievalista - Dossier monographique "Le Bestiaire médiéval”; 91-116Medievalista; n. 29 (2021): Medievalista - Dossier Monográfico "O Bestiário Medieval"; 91-1161646-740Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://medievalista.iem.fcsh.unl.pt/index.php/medievalista/article/view/121https://medievalista.iem.fcsh.unl.pt/index.php/medievalista/article/view/121/110Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Medievalistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDines, Ilya2023-03-28T12:32:07Zoai:ojs2.medteste.fcsh.unl.pt:article/121Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:46:47.756825Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
Produzindo o bestiário: do texto à imagem
title Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
spellingShingle Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
Dines, Ilya
Physiologus
Bestiaries
Deviations
Manuscripts
Images
Physiologus
Bestiários
Desvios
Manuscritos
Imagens
title_short Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
title_full Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
title_fullStr Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
title_full_unstemmed Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
title_sort Producing the Bestiary: From Text to Image
author Dines, Ilya
author_facet Dines, Ilya
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dines, Ilya
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physiologus
Bestiaries
Deviations
Manuscripts
Images
Physiologus
Bestiários
Desvios
Manuscritos
Imagens
topic Physiologus
Bestiaries
Deviations
Manuscripts
Images
Physiologus
Bestiários
Desvios
Manuscritos
Imagens
description In this paper, I investigate the relationship between the text and the images in medieval Latin bestiary manuscripts. Medieval bestiaries, which are derived from the ancient Physiologus, comprise a nearly 1800-year-old tradition and have spawned several hundreds of copies throughout Europe, including a smaller subset of Latin bestiaries. Summarizing the first ever comprehensive analysis of the entire corpus of Latin bestiaries, this paper examines the patterns of deviations, or exceptions from the rigorous canon governing bestiary illustrations. I use the deviations to investigate the relationship between the work of the scribe and that of the artist in the production of bestiary manuscripts in order to determine to what extent medieval artists used already existing illustrations, and, conversely, when and to what extent they were willing or able to deviate from the canon. In the latter case, I try to explore the artist’s possible motivations, as well as the reasons for choosing specific motifs.   Bibliography BRODEUR, Arthur G. – “The Grateful Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 39 (1924), pp. 485-524. BROWN, Arthur C. – “The Knight of the Lion”. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 20 (1905), pp. 673-706. CLARK, Willene B. – A Medieval Book of Beasts: The Second-Family Bestiary. Commentary, Art, Text and Translation, Woodbridge: Boydell, 2006. CURLEY, Michael – Physiologus: A Medieval Book of Nature Lore. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1979. DINES, llya – “The Hare and its Alter Ego in the Middle Ages”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society 17 (2004), pp. 73–84. DINES, Ilya – “The Problem of the Transitional Family of Bestiaries”. Reinardus: Yearbook of the International Reynard Society (2013), pp. 29-52.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.4000/medievalista.3867
https://doi.org/10.4000/medievalista.3867
url https://doi.org/10.4000/medievalista.3867
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://medievalista.iem.fcsh.unl.pt/index.php/medievalista/article/view/121
https://medievalista.iem.fcsh.unl.pt/index.php/medievalista/article/view/121/110
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Medievalista
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Medievalista
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IEM - Instituto de Estudos Medievais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IEM - Instituto de Estudos Medievais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Medievalista; No 29 (2021): Medievalista - "The Medieval Bestiary" Monograph; 91-116
Medievalista; No 29 (2021): Medievalista - Dossier monographique "Le Bestiaire médiéval”; 91-116
Medievalista; n. 29 (2021): Medievalista - Dossier Monográfico "O Bestiário Medieval"; 91-116
1646-740X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131551396528128