Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Machado, Armando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179
Resumo: To study how multiple stimuli may control discriminative behavior, we exposed fifteen pigeons to a symbolic matching-to-sample task with three samples that differed only in duration (2, 6, and 18s) and two keylight colors as comparisons. The pigeons learned to choose one comparison after the shortest sample, and the other comparison after the intermediate and longest samples. A 30-s intertrial interval (ITI), illuminated with the houselight, separated the trials. Previous data has suggested that, in this arrangement, both sample keylight and the ITI houselight influence choice. To assess this joint stimulus control, we introduced two tests. In the no-sample test, the keylight was not illuminated and the comparisons followed the ITI immediately; in the dark-ITI test, the houselight was not illuminated. Results confirmed that both stimuli influenced choice, with an apparent trade-off between them: The more a pigeon relied on one stimulus, the less it seemed to rely on the other. We discuss potential models of joint stimulus in temporal discrimination tasks.
id RCAP_c6be8db29cd79d5c3e404bf05c13c314
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/87179
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination taskAttentional trade-offDiscrimination learningKey peckMatching to samplePigeonStimulus controlTo study how multiple stimuli may control discriminative behavior, we exposed fifteen pigeons to a symbolic matching-to-sample task with three samples that differed only in duration (2, 6, and 18s) and two keylight colors as comparisons. The pigeons learned to choose one comparison after the shortest sample, and the other comparison after the intermediate and longest samples. A 30-s intertrial interval (ITI), illuminated with the houselight, separated the trials. Previous data has suggested that, in this arrangement, both sample keylight and the ITI houselight influence choice. To assess this joint stimulus control, we introduced two tests. In the no-sample test, the keylight was not illuminated and the comparisons followed the ITI immediately; in the dark-ITI test, the houselight was not illuminated. Results confirmed that both stimuli influenced choice, with an apparent trade-off between them: The more a pigeon relied on one stimulus, the less it seemed to rely on the other. We discuss potential models of joint stimulus in temporal discrimination tasks.FAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo(2014/50909–8)ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoPinto, CarlosMachado, Armando2023-11-012023-11-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179eng0023-969010.1016/j.lmot.2023.101928info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-11T01:16:57Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/87179Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:37:55.322550Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
title Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
spellingShingle Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
Pinto, Carlos
Attentional trade-off
Discrimination learning
Key peck
Matching to sample
Pigeon
Stimulus control
title_short Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
title_full Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
title_fullStr Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
title_full_unstemmed Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
title_sort Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
author Pinto, Carlos
author_facet Pinto, Carlos
Machado, Armando
author_role author
author2 Machado, Armando
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Carlos
Machado, Armando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Attentional trade-off
Discrimination learning
Key peck
Matching to sample
Pigeon
Stimulus control
topic Attentional trade-off
Discrimination learning
Key peck
Matching to sample
Pigeon
Stimulus control
description To study how multiple stimuli may control discriminative behavior, we exposed fifteen pigeons to a symbolic matching-to-sample task with three samples that differed only in duration (2, 6, and 18s) and two keylight colors as comparisons. The pigeons learned to choose one comparison after the shortest sample, and the other comparison after the intermediate and longest samples. A 30-s intertrial interval (ITI), illuminated with the houselight, separated the trials. Previous data has suggested that, in this arrangement, both sample keylight and the ITI houselight influence choice. To assess this joint stimulus control, we introduced two tests. In the no-sample test, the keylight was not illuminated and the comparisons followed the ITI immediately; in the dark-ITI test, the houselight was not illuminated. Results confirmed that both stimuli influenced choice, with an apparent trade-off between them: The more a pigeon relied on one stimulus, the less it seemed to rely on the other. We discuss potential models of joint stimulus in temporal discrimination tasks.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-01
2023-11-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0023-9690
10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101928
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134937998163968