Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179 |
Resumo: | To study how multiple stimuli may control discriminative behavior, we exposed fifteen pigeons to a symbolic matching-to-sample task with three samples that differed only in duration (2, 6, and 18s) and two keylight colors as comparisons. The pigeons learned to choose one comparison after the shortest sample, and the other comparison after the intermediate and longest samples. A 30-s intertrial interval (ITI), illuminated with the houselight, separated the trials. Previous data has suggested that, in this arrangement, both sample keylight and the ITI houselight influence choice. To assess this joint stimulus control, we introduced two tests. In the no-sample test, the keylight was not illuminated and the comparisons followed the ITI immediately; in the dark-ITI test, the houselight was not illuminated. Results confirmed that both stimuli influenced choice, with an apparent trade-off between them: The more a pigeon relied on one stimulus, the less it seemed to rely on the other. We discuss potential models of joint stimulus in temporal discrimination tasks. |
id |
RCAP_c6be8db29cd79d5c3e404bf05c13c314 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/87179 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination taskAttentional trade-offDiscrimination learningKey peckMatching to samplePigeonStimulus controlTo study how multiple stimuli may control discriminative behavior, we exposed fifteen pigeons to a symbolic matching-to-sample task with three samples that differed only in duration (2, 6, and 18s) and two keylight colors as comparisons. The pigeons learned to choose one comparison after the shortest sample, and the other comparison after the intermediate and longest samples. A 30-s intertrial interval (ITI), illuminated with the houselight, separated the trials. Previous data has suggested that, in this arrangement, both sample keylight and the ITI houselight influence choice. To assess this joint stimulus control, we introduced two tests. In the no-sample test, the keylight was not illuminated and the comparisons followed the ITI immediately; in the dark-ITI test, the houselight was not illuminated. Results confirmed that both stimuli influenced choice, with an apparent trade-off between them: The more a pigeon relied on one stimulus, the less it seemed to rely on the other. We discuss potential models of joint stimulus in temporal discrimination tasks.FAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo(2014/50909–8)ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoPinto, CarlosMachado, Armando2023-11-012023-11-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179eng0023-969010.1016/j.lmot.2023.101928info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-11T01:16:57Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/87179Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:37:55.322550Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task |
title |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task |
spellingShingle |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task Pinto, Carlos Attentional trade-off Discrimination learning Key peck Matching to sample Pigeon Stimulus control |
title_short |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task |
title_full |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task |
title_fullStr |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task |
title_sort |
Trade-offs in stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task |
author |
Pinto, Carlos |
author_facet |
Pinto, Carlos Machado, Armando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Machado, Armando |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Carlos Machado, Armando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Attentional trade-off Discrimination learning Key peck Matching to sample Pigeon Stimulus control |
topic |
Attentional trade-off Discrimination learning Key peck Matching to sample Pigeon Stimulus control |
description |
To study how multiple stimuli may control discriminative behavior, we exposed fifteen pigeons to a symbolic matching-to-sample task with three samples that differed only in duration (2, 6, and 18s) and two keylight colors as comparisons. The pigeons learned to choose one comparison after the shortest sample, and the other comparison after the intermediate and longest samples. A 30-s intertrial interval (ITI), illuminated with the houselight, separated the trials. Previous data has suggested that, in this arrangement, both sample keylight and the ITI houselight influence choice. To assess this joint stimulus control, we introduced two tests. In the no-sample test, the keylight was not illuminated and the comparisons followed the ITI immediately; in the dark-ITI test, the houselight was not illuminated. Results confirmed that both stimuli influenced choice, with an apparent trade-off between them: The more a pigeon relied on one stimulus, the less it seemed to rely on the other. We discuss potential models of joint stimulus in temporal discrimination tasks. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-01 2023-11-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0023-9690 10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101928 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134937998163968 |