A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other"
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/162100 |
Resumo: | UID/FIL/00183/2013 SFRH/BPD/99511/2014 |
| id |
RCAP_c946aba22cbc455f74194d18115b482e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/162100 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| repository_id_str |
7160 |
| spelling |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other"ReasonsJudgments about right and wrongWeakness of willUID/FIL/00183/2013 SFRH/BPD/99511/2014In his book from 1998 - What we owe to Each Other - T.M. Scanlon argued that the concept of reason is a primitive one when it comes to explain every course of action that might be morally relevant. Relying on an intuitive pattern of explanation for what it is for something to be a reason Scanlon argues that any such consideration will always lead back to the same idea: a reason is a consideration that counts in favor of something. And it counts in favor of something by providing a reason for it. It seems as if we have reached the definitional bedrock of reasons. I believe Scanlon left out of consideration typical courses of human action, that not only would be wrongly described as "rational", but whose agent itself would systematically fail in providing reasons to explain both his behaviour and a resulting action or course of action. In this paper I will be focusing my attention on the case of weakness of will as a possible counterexample to Scanlon's proposal.Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)RUNFalcato, Ana2024-01-10T22:10:57Z20142014-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article20application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/162100eng0104-4443PURE: 1644137https://doi.org/10.7213/aurora.26.039.AO01info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:44:55Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/162100Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:58:45.465328Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" |
| title |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" |
| spellingShingle |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" Falcato, Ana Reasons Judgments about right and wrong Weakness of will |
| title_short |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" |
| title_full |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" |
| title_fullStr |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" |
| title_sort |
A counterexample to the originarity of reasons in "What we Owe to Each Other" |
| author |
Falcato, Ana |
| author_facet |
Falcato, Ana |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA) RUN |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Falcato, Ana |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Reasons Judgments about right and wrong Weakness of will |
| topic |
Reasons Judgments about right and wrong Weakness of will |
| description |
UID/FIL/00183/2013 SFRH/BPD/99511/2014 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 2024-01-10T22:10:57Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/162100 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/162100 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0104-4443 PURE: 1644137 https://doi.org/10.7213/aurora.26.039.AO01 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
20 application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1799138168055791616 |