Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/43962 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040019 |
Resumo: | This article belongs to the Special Issue: "Where Are the Legal Professions Heading? Selected Papers of the International Working Group for Comparative Studies of Legal Professions" |
id |
RCAP_cfcfde7551612431190eed6616d6ea64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/43962 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in actionPublic ProsecutorsCompetencesIntermediary roleCitizensAccess to law and justiceThis article belongs to the Special Issue: "Where Are the Legal Professions Heading? Selected Papers of the International Working Group for Comparative Studies of Legal Professions"Public Prosecutors have not received much attention from international, suprastate, state and/or associative institutions in terms of seeking to influence the adoption of a common organisational model by the most diverse countries. What we have instead is mainly the approval, at different moments, of guiding principles for the exercise of functions—primarily of judges, but also, since the late 1980s, of Public Prosecutors—with special emphasis on issues of autonomy and impartiality regarding their competences and the conditions in which prosecution is carried out. However, in countries such as Portugal, Public Prosecutors exercise a wide range of competences in various legal areas, a fact that turns them into key actors in a context of evaluating the performance of the judicial system and when efforts are being made to improve its functioning, even in the midst of financial constraints. This is the backdrop to the present article, which stems from the need to discuss the functioning of the Public Prosecution Service and its professional practices in order to promote the circulation of ideas and solutions for possible judicial reforms in the model currently in force in Portugal. It is not a question of looking for the “perfect model” or of trying to achieve an “ideal synthesis,” but rather of highlighting the main aspects that can contribute to the defence of legality and the promotion of access to law and justice through the action of Public Prosecutors. In order to achieve such a goal, it is necessary for Public Prosecutors to assume a new paradigm, centred on the defence of citizenship rights. The main objective here is to discuss and reflect on the identity, competences and professional practice of Portugal’s Public Prosecutors in the context of major transformations in the judicial systems and in the legal professions themselves, both as key actors and as promoters of citizens' access to law and justice in the various legal areas in which they are active participants. The aim of this article is thus to analyse the way in which the Public Prosecutors’ exercise of their multiple competences, not only in relation to citizens but also with regard to their intermediary role between the courts and the various entities and professions at play, both public and private, contributes to achieving better justice for all.MDPI2017-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/43962http://hdl.handle.net/10316/43962https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040019eng2075-471Xhttp://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/19Dias, João Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-05-25T06:23:32Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/43962Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:50:41.811022Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action |
title |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action |
spellingShingle |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action Dias, João Paulo Public Prosecutors Competences Intermediary role Citizens Access to law and justice |
title_short |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action |
title_full |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action |
title_fullStr |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action |
title_sort |
Multiple competences of judicial and social intervention: Portuguese public prosecutors in action |
author |
Dias, João Paulo |
author_facet |
Dias, João Paulo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, João Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Public Prosecutors Competences Intermediary role Citizens Access to law and justice |
topic |
Public Prosecutors Competences Intermediary role Citizens Access to law and justice |
description |
This article belongs to the Special Issue: "Where Are the Legal Professions Heading? Selected Papers of the International Working Group for Comparative Studies of Legal Professions" |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/43962 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/43962 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040019 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/43962 https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040019 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2075-471X http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/19 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133787812003840 |