Lay litigation behaviour in postcolonial Hong Kong courtrooms

• Autor(a) principal: Leung, Janny H. C.
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/2419
• topic: Artigos/Articles

Many jurisdictions have recently experienced a significant increase in the number of litigants in person (LiPs) in their civil justice systems; related research (e.g. Baldacci, 2006; Moorhead, 2007; Richardson et al., 2012; Zuckerman, 2014) has assessed the impact of this on the legal system. In postcolonial Hong Kong, implementation of legal bilingualism (as a result of which ordinary itizens may use their local language, Cantonese, to litigate) and the changing political environment following the 1997 transfer of sovereignty, have also led to a surge in unrepresented litigation. Drawing on both observation data collected in Hong Kong courtrooms and interviews with litigants, this interdisciplinary study explores how LiPs in Hong Kong engage, and struggle, with the justice system, and how changing patterns of interaction in these courtrooms reflect a postcolonial legality. It illustrates the strategies LiPs adopt in presenting their case, which are not displayed by represented litigants or professional advocates, and explains their behaviour in linguistic and sociocultural terms. It is argued that the communication gap between laypersons and legal professionals is ideological and structural, and cannot be bridged simply by adopting present approaches to either assisting or educating the former.