Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Boess, Stella
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i2.5107
Resumo: The scaling up of zero energy (ZE) renovations contributes to the energy transition. Yet ZE renovations can be complex and error-prone in both process and outcome. This article draws on theory from sociotechnical design, participatory design, and inclusive design to analyse four recent case studies of ZE renovation/building in the Netherlands. The cases are studied using a mix of retrospective interviews and workshops, as well as ethnographic research. Three of the cases studied are ZE renovations of which two are recently completed and one is in progress, while the fourth case is a recently completed ZE new build. Three of the cases are social housing and one is mixed ownership. The research enquired into the situation of the project managers conducting the processes and also drew on resident experiences. The ZE renovation/builds are analysed as sociotechnical product-service systems (PSSs). The article evaluates how the use values, product values, and result values of these PSSs emerged from the processes. This perspective reveals issues with the usability of the PSSs, as well as with cost structures, technical tweaks, and maintenance agreements. Applying a design perspective provides starting points for co-learning strategies that could improve outcomes. Two example strategies that have potential in this regard are described, using demo dwellings and user manual as PSS prototypes in the early design phase. These and similar strategies could support the professionals in the field in creating successful ZE renovation/building processes.
id RCAP_d33f53114d166ad814c329bb3c9658ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5107
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovationsdemo dwellings; design thinking; inclusive design; innovation; participatory design; product-service systems; sociotechnical designThe scaling up of zero energy (ZE) renovations contributes to the energy transition. Yet ZE renovations can be complex and error-prone in both process and outcome. This article draws on theory from sociotechnical design, participatory design, and inclusive design to analyse four recent case studies of ZE renovation/building in the Netherlands. The cases are studied using a mix of retrospective interviews and workshops, as well as ethnographic research. Three of the cases studied are ZE renovations of which two are recently completed and one is in progress, while the fourth case is a recently completed ZE new build. Three of the cases are social housing and one is mixed ownership. The research enquired into the situation of the project managers conducting the processes and also drew on resident experiences. The ZE renovation/builds are analysed as sociotechnical product-service systems (PSSs). The article evaluates how the use values, product values, and result values of these PSSs emerged from the processes. This perspective reveals issues with the usability of the PSSs, as well as with cost structures, technical tweaks, and maintenance agreements. Applying a design perspective provides starting points for co-learning strategies that could improve outcomes. Two example strategies that have potential in this regard are described, using demo dwellings and user manual as PSS prototypes in the early design phase. These and similar strategies could support the professionals in the field in creating successful ZE renovation/building processes.Cogitatio2022-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i2.5107oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5107Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 2 (2022): Zero Energy Renovation: How to Get Users Involved?; 97-1072183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5107https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i2.5107https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5107/5107Copyright (c) 2022 Stella Boessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoess, Stella2022-12-20T11:00:16Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5107Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:08.242764Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
title Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
spellingShingle Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
Boess, Stella
demo dwellings; design thinking; inclusive design; innovation; participatory design; product-service systems; sociotechnical design
title_short Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
title_full Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
title_fullStr Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
title_full_unstemmed Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
title_sort Let’s Get Sociotechnical: A Design Perspective on Zero Energy Renovations
author Boess, Stella
author_facet Boess, Stella
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boess, Stella
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv demo dwellings; design thinking; inclusive design; innovation; participatory design; product-service systems; sociotechnical design
topic demo dwellings; design thinking; inclusive design; innovation; participatory design; product-service systems; sociotechnical design
description The scaling up of zero energy (ZE) renovations contributes to the energy transition. Yet ZE renovations can be complex and error-prone in both process and outcome. This article draws on theory from sociotechnical design, participatory design, and inclusive design to analyse four recent case studies of ZE renovation/building in the Netherlands. The cases are studied using a mix of retrospective interviews and workshops, as well as ethnographic research. Three of the cases studied are ZE renovations of which two are recently completed and one is in progress, while the fourth case is a recently completed ZE new build. Three of the cases are social housing and one is mixed ownership. The research enquired into the situation of the project managers conducting the processes and also drew on resident experiences. The ZE renovation/builds are analysed as sociotechnical product-service systems (PSSs). The article evaluates how the use values, product values, and result values of these PSSs emerged from the processes. This perspective reveals issues with the usability of the PSSs, as well as with cost structures, technical tweaks, and maintenance agreements. Applying a design perspective provides starting points for co-learning strategies that could improve outcomes. Two example strategies that have potential in this regard are described, using demo dwellings and user manual as PSS prototypes in the early design phase. These and similar strategies could support the professionals in the field in creating successful ZE renovation/building processes.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i2.5107
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5107
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i2.5107
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5107
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5107
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i2.5107
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5107/5107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Stella Boess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Stella Boess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 2 (2022): Zero Energy Renovation: How to Get Users Involved?; 97-107
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130667350491136