Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado, P. M.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Cerqueira, M., Ávila-Ribeiro, P., Aguiar, R., Bernardo, A., Sepriano, Alexandre, Águeda, A., Cordeiro, A., Raposo, A., Maria Rodrigues, Ana, Barcelos, A., Malcata, A., Lopes, C., Vaz, C. C., Nour, D., Godinho, F., Alvarenga, F., Pimentel-Santos, F., Canhão, Helena, Santos, H., Cunha, I., Neves, J. S., Fonseca, J. E., Gomes, J. L., Tavares-Costa, J., Costa, L., Cunha-Miranda, L., Maurício, L., Cruz, M., Afonso, M. C., Santos, M. J., Bernardes, M., Valente, P., Figueira, R., Pimenta, S., Ramiro, Sofia, Pedrosa, T., Costa, T. A., Vieira-Sousa, E., on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
Resumo: Objective: To update the recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. Methods: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on lite - rature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, the recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication and the level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was anonymously assessed using an online survey. Results: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching of biological therapies in patients with axSpA. In total, se ven recommendations were produced. The first recommendation is a general statement indicating that biological therapy is not a first-line drug treatment option and should only be used after conventional treatment has failed. The second recommendation is also a ge - neral statement about the broad concept of axSpA adopted by these recommendations that includes both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA. Recommendations 3 to 7 deal with the definition of active di - sease (including the recommended threshold of 2.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] or the threshold of 4 [0-10 scale] for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), conventional treatment failure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the first-line drug treatment), assessment of response to treatment (based on an ASDAS improvement of at least 1.1 units or a BASDAI improvement of at least 2 units [0-10 scale] or at least 50%), and strategy in the presence of an ina -dequate response (where switching is recommended) or in the presence of long-term remission (where a process of biological therapy optimization can be consi - dered, either a gradual increase in the interval between doses or a decrease of each dose of the biological the - rapy). Conclusion: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with axSpA should be treated with biological therapies. They co - ver a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.
id RCAP_d37d0ecc4d483516302c25e02412a2aa
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/32370
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 updateAnkylo - sing spondylitisAxial spondyloarthritisBiological therapiesGuidelinesPortugalRe - commendationsRheumatologyObjective: To update the recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. Methods: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on lite - rature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, the recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication and the level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was anonymously assessed using an online survey. Results: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching of biological therapies in patients with axSpA. In total, se ven recommendations were produced. The first recommendation is a general statement indicating that biological therapy is not a first-line drug treatment option and should only be used after conventional treatment has failed. The second recommendation is also a ge - neral statement about the broad concept of axSpA adopted by these recommendations that includes both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA. Recommendations 3 to 7 deal with the definition of active di - sease (including the recommended threshold of 2.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] or the threshold of 4 [0-10 scale] for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), conventional treatment failure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the first-line drug treatment), assessment of response to treatment (based on an ASDAS improvement of at least 1.1 units or a BASDAI improvement of at least 2 units [0-10 scale] or at least 50%), and strategy in the presence of an ina -dequate response (where switching is recommended) or in the presence of long-term remission (where a process of biological therapy optimization can be consi - dered, either a gradual increase in the interval between doses or a decrease of each dose of the biological the - rapy). Conclusion: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with axSpA should be treated with biological therapies. They co - ver a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)RUNMachado, P. M.Cerqueira, M.Ávila-Ribeiro, P.Aguiar, R.Bernardo, A.Sepriano, AlexandreÁgueda, A.Cordeiro, A.Raposo, A.Maria Rodrigues, AnaBarcelos, A.Malcata, A.Lopes, C.Vaz, C. C.Nour, D.Godinho, F.Alvarenga, F.Pimentel-Santos, F.Canhão, HelenaSantos, H.Cunha, I.Neves, J. S.Fonseca, J. E.Gomes, J. L.Tavares-Costa, J.Costa, L.Cunha-Miranda, L.Maurício, L.Cruz, M.Afonso, M. C.Santos, M. J.Bernardes, M.Valente, P.Figueira, R.Pimenta, S.Ramiro, SofiaPedrosa, T.Costa, T. A.Vieira-Sousa, E.on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology2018-03-12T23:14:41Z2018-022018-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10application/pdfhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxKeng0303-464XPURE: 3694052http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxKinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:18:00Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/32370Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:29:50.763209Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
title Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
spellingShingle Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
Machado, P. M.
Ankylo - sing spondylitis
Axial spondyloarthritis
Biological therapies
Guidelines
Portugal
Re - commendations
Rheumatology
title_short Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
title_full Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
title_fullStr Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
title_full_unstemmed Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
title_sort Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
author Machado, P. M.
author_facet Machado, P. M.
Cerqueira, M.
Ávila-Ribeiro, P.
Aguiar, R.
Bernardo, A.
Sepriano, Alexandre
Águeda, A.
Cordeiro, A.
Raposo, A.
Maria Rodrigues, Ana
Barcelos, A.
Malcata, A.
Lopes, C.
Vaz, C. C.
Nour, D.
Godinho, F.
Alvarenga, F.
Pimentel-Santos, F.
Canhão, Helena
Santos, H.
Cunha, I.
Neves, J. S.
Fonseca, J. E.
Gomes, J. L.
Tavares-Costa, J.
Costa, L.
Cunha-Miranda, L.
Maurício, L.
Cruz, M.
Afonso, M. C.
Santos, M. J.
Bernardes, M.
Valente, P.
Figueira, R.
Pimenta, S.
Ramiro, Sofia
Pedrosa, T.
Costa, T. A.
Vieira-Sousa, E.
on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology
author_role author
author2 Cerqueira, M.
Ávila-Ribeiro, P.
Aguiar, R.
Bernardo, A.
Sepriano, Alexandre
Águeda, A.
Cordeiro, A.
Raposo, A.
Maria Rodrigues, Ana
Barcelos, A.
Malcata, A.
Lopes, C.
Vaz, C. C.
Nour, D.
Godinho, F.
Alvarenga, F.
Pimentel-Santos, F.
Canhão, Helena
Santos, H.
Cunha, I.
Neves, J. S.
Fonseca, J. E.
Gomes, J. L.
Tavares-Costa, J.
Costa, L.
Cunha-Miranda, L.
Maurício, L.
Cruz, M.
Afonso, M. C.
Santos, M. J.
Bernardes, M.
Valente, P.
Figueira, R.
Pimenta, S.
Ramiro, Sofia
Pedrosa, T.
Costa, T. A.
Vieira-Sousa, E.
on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)
Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado, P. M.
Cerqueira, M.
Ávila-Ribeiro, P.
Aguiar, R.
Bernardo, A.
Sepriano, Alexandre
Águeda, A.
Cordeiro, A.
Raposo, A.
Maria Rodrigues, Ana
Barcelos, A.
Malcata, A.
Lopes, C.
Vaz, C. C.
Nour, D.
Godinho, F.
Alvarenga, F.
Pimentel-Santos, F.
Canhão, Helena
Santos, H.
Cunha, I.
Neves, J. S.
Fonseca, J. E.
Gomes, J. L.
Tavares-Costa, J.
Costa, L.
Cunha-Miranda, L.
Maurício, L.
Cruz, M.
Afonso, M. C.
Santos, M. J.
Bernardes, M.
Valente, P.
Figueira, R.
Pimenta, S.
Ramiro, Sofia
Pedrosa, T.
Costa, T. A.
Vieira-Sousa, E.
on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ankylo - sing spondylitis
Axial spondyloarthritis
Biological therapies
Guidelines
Portugal
Re - commendations
Rheumatology
topic Ankylo - sing spondylitis
Axial spondyloarthritis
Biological therapies
Guidelines
Portugal
Re - commendations
Rheumatology
description Objective: To update the recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. Methods: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on lite - rature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, the recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication and the level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was anonymously assessed using an online survey. Results: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching of biological therapies in patients with axSpA. In total, se ven recommendations were produced. The first recommendation is a general statement indicating that biological therapy is not a first-line drug treatment option and should only be used after conventional treatment has failed. The second recommendation is also a ge - neral statement about the broad concept of axSpA adopted by these recommendations that includes both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA. Recommendations 3 to 7 deal with the definition of active di - sease (including the recommended threshold of 2.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] or the threshold of 4 [0-10 scale] for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), conventional treatment failure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the first-line drug treatment), assessment of response to treatment (based on an ASDAS improvement of at least 1.1 units or a BASDAI improvement of at least 2 units [0-10 scale] or at least 50%), and strategy in the presence of an ina -dequate response (where switching is recommended) or in the presence of long-term remission (where a process of biological therapy optimization can be consi - dered, either a gradual increase in the interval between doses or a decrease of each dose of the biological the - rapy). Conclusion: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with axSpA should be treated with biological therapies. They co - ver a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-12T23:14:41Z
2018-02
2018-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0303-464X
PURE: 3694052
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 10
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137923210149888