Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
Resumo: | Objective: To update the recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. Methods: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on lite - rature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, the recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication and the level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was anonymously assessed using an online survey. Results: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching of biological therapies in patients with axSpA. In total, se ven recommendations were produced. The first recommendation is a general statement indicating that biological therapy is not a first-line drug treatment option and should only be used after conventional treatment has failed. The second recommendation is also a ge - neral statement about the broad concept of axSpA adopted by these recommendations that includes both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA. Recommendations 3 to 7 deal with the definition of active di - sease (including the recommended threshold of 2.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] or the threshold of 4 [0-10 scale] for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), conventional treatment failure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the first-line drug treatment), assessment of response to treatment (based on an ASDAS improvement of at least 1.1 units or a BASDAI improvement of at least 2 units [0-10 scale] or at least 50%), and strategy in the presence of an ina -dequate response (where switching is recommended) or in the presence of long-term remission (where a process of biological therapy optimization can be consi - dered, either a gradual increase in the interval between doses or a decrease of each dose of the biological the - rapy). Conclusion: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with axSpA should be treated with biological therapies. They co - ver a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated. |
id |
RCAP_d37d0ecc4d483516302c25e02412a2aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/32370 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 updateAnkylo - sing spondylitisAxial spondyloarthritisBiological therapiesGuidelinesPortugalRe - commendationsRheumatologyObjective: To update the recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. Methods: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on lite - rature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, the recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication and the level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was anonymously assessed using an online survey. Results: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching of biological therapies in patients with axSpA. In total, se ven recommendations were produced. The first recommendation is a general statement indicating that biological therapy is not a first-line drug treatment option and should only be used after conventional treatment has failed. The second recommendation is also a ge - neral statement about the broad concept of axSpA adopted by these recommendations that includes both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA. Recommendations 3 to 7 deal with the definition of active di - sease (including the recommended threshold of 2.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] or the threshold of 4 [0-10 scale] for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), conventional treatment failure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the first-line drug treatment), assessment of response to treatment (based on an ASDAS improvement of at least 1.1 units or a BASDAI improvement of at least 2 units [0-10 scale] or at least 50%), and strategy in the presence of an ina -dequate response (where switching is recommended) or in the presence of long-term remission (where a process of biological therapy optimization can be consi - dered, either a gradual increase in the interval between doses or a decrease of each dose of the biological the - rapy). Conclusion: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with axSpA should be treated with biological therapies. They co - ver a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)RUNMachado, P. M.Cerqueira, M.Ávila-Ribeiro, P.Aguiar, R.Bernardo, A.Sepriano, AlexandreÁgueda, A.Cordeiro, A.Raposo, A.Maria Rodrigues, AnaBarcelos, A.Malcata, A.Lopes, C.Vaz, C. C.Nour, D.Godinho, F.Alvarenga, F.Pimentel-Santos, F.Canhão, HelenaSantos, H.Cunha, I.Neves, J. S.Fonseca, J. E.Gomes, J. L.Tavares-Costa, J.Costa, L.Cunha-Miranda, L.Maurício, L.Cruz, M.Afonso, M. C.Santos, M. J.Bernardes, M.Valente, P.Figueira, R.Pimenta, S.Ramiro, SofiaPedrosa, T.Costa, T. A.Vieira-Sousa, E.on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology2018-03-12T23:14:41Z2018-022018-02-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10application/pdfhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxKeng0303-464XPURE: 3694052http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxKinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:18:00Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/32370Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:29:50.763209Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update |
title |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update |
spellingShingle |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update Machado, P. M. Ankylo - sing spondylitis Axial spondyloarthritis Biological therapies Guidelines Portugal Re - commendations Rheumatology |
title_short |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update |
title_full |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update |
title_fullStr |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update |
title_full_unstemmed |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update |
title_sort |
Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update |
author |
Machado, P. M. |
author_facet |
Machado, P. M. Cerqueira, M. Ávila-Ribeiro, P. Aguiar, R. Bernardo, A. Sepriano, Alexandre Águeda, A. Cordeiro, A. Raposo, A. Maria Rodrigues, Ana Barcelos, A. Malcata, A. Lopes, C. Vaz, C. C. Nour, D. Godinho, F. Alvarenga, F. Pimentel-Santos, F. Canhão, Helena Santos, H. Cunha, I. Neves, J. S. Fonseca, J. E. Gomes, J. L. Tavares-Costa, J. Costa, L. Cunha-Miranda, L. Maurício, L. Cruz, M. Afonso, M. C. Santos, M. J. Bernardes, M. Valente, P. Figueira, R. Pimenta, S. Ramiro, Sofia Pedrosa, T. Costa, T. A. Vieira-Sousa, E. on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cerqueira, M. Ávila-Ribeiro, P. Aguiar, R. Bernardo, A. Sepriano, Alexandre Águeda, A. Cordeiro, A. Raposo, A. Maria Rodrigues, Ana Barcelos, A. Malcata, A. Lopes, C. Vaz, C. C. Nour, D. Godinho, F. Alvarenga, F. Pimentel-Santos, F. Canhão, Helena Santos, H. Cunha, I. Neves, J. S. Fonseca, J. E. Gomes, J. L. Tavares-Costa, J. Costa, L. Cunha-Miranda, L. Maurício, L. Cruz, M. Afonso, M. C. Santos, M. J. Bernardes, M. Valente, P. Figueira, R. Pimenta, S. Ramiro, Sofia Pedrosa, T. Costa, T. A. Vieira-Sousa, E. on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM) Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC) Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Machado, P. M. Cerqueira, M. Ávila-Ribeiro, P. Aguiar, R. Bernardo, A. Sepriano, Alexandre Águeda, A. Cordeiro, A. Raposo, A. Maria Rodrigues, Ana Barcelos, A. Malcata, A. Lopes, C. Vaz, C. C. Nour, D. Godinho, F. Alvarenga, F. Pimentel-Santos, F. Canhão, Helena Santos, H. Cunha, I. Neves, J. S. Fonseca, J. E. Gomes, J. L. Tavares-Costa, J. Costa, L. Cunha-Miranda, L. Maurício, L. Cruz, M. Afonso, M. C. Santos, M. J. Bernardes, M. Valente, P. Figueira, R. Pimenta, S. Ramiro, Sofia Pedrosa, T. Costa, T. A. Vieira-Sousa, E. on behalf of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ankylo - sing spondylitis Axial spondyloarthritis Biological therapies Guidelines Portugal Re - commendations Rheumatology |
topic |
Ankylo - sing spondylitis Axial spondyloarthritis Biological therapies Guidelines Portugal Re - commendations Rheumatology |
description |
Objective: To update the recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. Methods: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on lite - rature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, the recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication and the level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was anonymously assessed using an online survey. Results: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching of biological therapies in patients with axSpA. In total, se ven recommendations were produced. The first recommendation is a general statement indicating that biological therapy is not a first-line drug treatment option and should only be used after conventional treatment has failed. The second recommendation is also a ge - neral statement about the broad concept of axSpA adopted by these recommendations that includes both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA. Recommendations 3 to 7 deal with the definition of active di - sease (including the recommended threshold of 2.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] or the threshold of 4 [0-10 scale] for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), conventional treatment failure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the first-line drug treatment), assessment of response to treatment (based on an ASDAS improvement of at least 1.1 units or a BASDAI improvement of at least 2 units [0-10 scale] or at least 50%), and strategy in the presence of an ina -dequate response (where switching is recommended) or in the presence of long-term remission (where a process of biological therapy optimization can be consi - dered, either a gradual increase in the interval between doses or a decrease of each dose of the biological the - rapy). Conclusion: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with axSpA should be treated with biological therapies. They co - ver a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-12T23:14:41Z 2018-02 2018-02-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
url |
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0303-464X PURE: 3694052 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042560361&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
10 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137923210149888 |