Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sépulchre, Marie
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085
Resumo: This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts.
id RCAP_e22077abf8b7338fac5cc13cb9a8d96c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7085
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Educationaccommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United StatesThis article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts.Cogitatio Press2023-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Disabled People and the Intersectional Nature of Social Inclusion; 362-3722183-280310.17645/si.i369reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085/3392Copyright (c) 2023 Marie Sépulchreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSépulchre, Marie2023-12-14T13:39:16Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7085Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:41:30.414937Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
spellingShingle Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
Sépulchre, Marie
accommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United States
title_short Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_full Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_fullStr Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_full_unstemmed Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_sort Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
author Sépulchre, Marie
author_facet Sépulchre, Marie
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sépulchre, Marie
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv accommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United States
topic accommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United States
description This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085/3392
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Marie Sépulchre
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Marie Sépulchre
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Disabled People and the Intersectional Nature of Social Inclusion; 362-372
2183-2803
10.17645/si.i369
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136317930471424