Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085 |
Resumo: | This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts. |
id |
RCAP_e22077abf8b7338fac5cc13cb9a8d96c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7085 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Educationaccommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United StatesThis article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts.Cogitatio Press2023-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Disabled People and the Intersectional Nature of Social Inclusion; 362-3722183-280310.17645/si.i369reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085/3392Copyright (c) 2023 Marie Sépulchreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSépulchre, Marie2023-12-14T13:39:16Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/7085Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:41:30.414937Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
spellingShingle |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education Sépulchre, Marie accommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United States |
title_short |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_full |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_fullStr |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_sort |
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
author |
Sépulchre, Marie |
author_facet |
Sépulchre, Marie |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sépulchre, Marie |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
accommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United States |
topic |
accommodations; anti‐discrimination; disability; diversity; equity; higher education; inclusion; intersectionality; praxis; Sweden; United States |
description |
This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i4.7085 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085/3392 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Marie Sépulchre info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Marie Sépulchre |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 4 (2023): Disabled People and the Intersectional Nature of Social Inclusion; 362-372 2183-2803 10.17645/si.i369 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136317930471424 |