The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.31877/on.2014.26.03 |
Resumo: | Aim: To describe the evolution of the perception of Self-efficacy of the family member caregiver (MFPC) during the process of taking care of a patient with colorectal cancer. Methods: A prospective longitudinal design was chosen to evaluate MFPC of colorectal cancer in curative or palliative treatment. Participants were assessed in three separate times that could globally reproduce the different moments of multimodal treatment in colorectal cancer, namely: M1 – after multidisciplinary team treatment decision (without any treatment); M2 – three months after M1 (which generally includes neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in cases of rectal cancer; surgery in colon cancer cases; the beginning of the adjuvant treatment in patients without distant metastasis; patients in palliative treatment); M3 – six months after M1 (which generally includes patients in adjuvant or palliative treatment). In M1 were evaluated 41 caregivers, 88 caregivers in M2 and in M3 98 caregivers. Results: the MFPC who took part in the sample were mostly women, married and retired, with a low level of schooling. Over time these MFPC presented a level of self-efficacy “averagely competent“ for to carry out the activities related to taking care process. However the perception of self-efficacy for to take medication and take care of the colostomy were areas where caregivers had lower levels of self-efficacy perception. When evaluating the perception of self-efficacy depending on the processes of care, the caregivers perceived less competence to “working together with the ill person” and “navigation the healthcare system”. The MFPC that perceived greater self-efficacy over time tend to be those caring for less dependent patients, using more resources, those who care for longer, the younger caregivers and with more schooling. Conclusions: The evaluation of the perception of self-efficacy is an important indicator for nurses in monitoring the transition of exercising the role of a familiar caregiver for a patient with colorectal cancer. |
id |
RCAP_e4362e6533b635173ddbb63543dafa26 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.onco.news:article/154 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patientA perceção de autoeficácia do membro da família prestador de cuidados no processo de tomar conta de um doente com cancro coloretalfamiliar cuidadorperceção de autoeficáciacancro coloretalfamily caregiverself-efficacycolorectal cancerAim: To describe the evolution of the perception of Self-efficacy of the family member caregiver (MFPC) during the process of taking care of a patient with colorectal cancer. Methods: A prospective longitudinal design was chosen to evaluate MFPC of colorectal cancer in curative or palliative treatment. Participants were assessed in three separate times that could globally reproduce the different moments of multimodal treatment in colorectal cancer, namely: M1 – after multidisciplinary team treatment decision (without any treatment); M2 – three months after M1 (which generally includes neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in cases of rectal cancer; surgery in colon cancer cases; the beginning of the adjuvant treatment in patients without distant metastasis; patients in palliative treatment); M3 – six months after M1 (which generally includes patients in adjuvant or palliative treatment). In M1 were evaluated 41 caregivers, 88 caregivers in M2 and in M3 98 caregivers. Results: the MFPC who took part in the sample were mostly women, married and retired, with a low level of schooling. Over time these MFPC presented a level of self-efficacy “averagely competent“ for to carry out the activities related to taking care process. However the perception of self-efficacy for to take medication and take care of the colostomy were areas where caregivers had lower levels of self-efficacy perception. When evaluating the perception of self-efficacy depending on the processes of care, the caregivers perceived less competence to “working together with the ill person” and “navigation the healthcare system”. The MFPC that perceived greater self-efficacy over time tend to be those caring for less dependent patients, using more resources, those who care for longer, the younger caregivers and with more schooling. Conclusions: The evaluation of the perception of self-efficacy is an important indicator for nurses in monitoring the transition of exercising the role of a familiar caregiver for a patient with colorectal cancer.Objetivo: Descrever a evolução da perceção de Autoeficácia do membro da família prestador de cuidados (MFPC) face ao processo de tomar conta de um doente com cancro coloretal. Métodos: Estudo prospetivo longitudinal, onde foram avaliados MFPC de doentes com cancro coloretal em tratamento curativo ou paliativo. Os participantes foram avaliados em três momentos distintos; no início do percurso terapêutico (M1); três meses após (M2) e seis meses após (M3). Em M1 foram avaliados 41 cuidadores, em M2 88 cuidadores e em M3 98 cuidadores. Resultados: Os MFPC dos doentes com cancro coloretal da amostra foram na sua maioria mulheres, casadas e reformadas, com um nível de escolaridade baixo. Ao longo do tempo estes MFPC apresentaram um nível de autoeficácia de “medianamente competentes” para a realização das atividades inerentes ao processo de tomar conta. Contudo na avaliação da perceção de autoeficácia face à dependência para tomar a medicação e cuidar da colostomia foram os domínios onde os cuidadores apresentam níveis mais baixos de perceção de autoeficácia. Ao avaliarmos a perceção de autoeficácia em função dos processos de cuidar, os cuidadores percecionam menos competência para “trabalhar com a pessoa dependente” e “negociar com os serviços de saúde”. Os MFPC que percecionam maior autoeficácia ao longo do tempo e face ao processo de tomar conta do doente dependente com cancro coloretal tendem a ser os que cuidam de doentes menos dependentes, que utilizam mais recursos, os que cuidam há mais tempo, os mais novos e com mais escolaridade. Conclusões: A avaliação da perceção de autoeficácia constitui um indicador importante para os enfermeiros na monitorização da transição para o exercício do papel de membro da família prestador de cuidados de um doente com cancro colorretal.AEOP – Associação de Enfermagem Oncológica Portuguesa2014-03-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.31877/on.2014.26.03https://doi.org/10.31877/on.2014.26.03Onco.news; No. 26 (2014): Onco.News Journal; 21-30Onco.News; N.º 26 (2014): Revista Onco.News; 21-302183-69141646-7868reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://onco.news/index.php/journal/article/view/154https://onco.news/index.php/journal/article/view/154/160Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Cristina FC Sousa Pinto, Filipe Pereira, Lúcio Lara Santos, Fátima Teixeirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFC Sousa Pinto, CristinaPereira, FilipeLara Santos, LúcioTeixeira, Fátima2024-03-16T07:55:24Zoai:oai.onco.news:article/154Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T04:01:23.849502Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient A perceção de autoeficácia do membro da família prestador de cuidados no processo de tomar conta de um doente com cancro coloretal |
title |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient |
spellingShingle |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient FC Sousa Pinto, Cristina familiar cuidador perceção de autoeficácia cancro coloretal family caregiver self-efficacy colorectal cancer |
title_short |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient |
title_full |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient |
title_fullStr |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient |
title_full_unstemmed |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient |
title_sort |
The caregiver family member's perceived self-efficacy in the process of caring for a colorectal cancer patient |
author |
FC Sousa Pinto, Cristina |
author_facet |
FC Sousa Pinto, Cristina Pereira, Filipe Lara Santos, Lúcio Teixeira, Fátima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Filipe Lara Santos, Lúcio Teixeira, Fátima |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
FC Sousa Pinto, Cristina Pereira, Filipe Lara Santos, Lúcio Teixeira, Fátima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
familiar cuidador perceção de autoeficácia cancro coloretal family caregiver self-efficacy colorectal cancer |
topic |
familiar cuidador perceção de autoeficácia cancro coloretal family caregiver self-efficacy colorectal cancer |
description |
Aim: To describe the evolution of the perception of Self-efficacy of the family member caregiver (MFPC) during the process of taking care of a patient with colorectal cancer. Methods: A prospective longitudinal design was chosen to evaluate MFPC of colorectal cancer in curative or palliative treatment. Participants were assessed in three separate times that could globally reproduce the different moments of multimodal treatment in colorectal cancer, namely: M1 – after multidisciplinary team treatment decision (without any treatment); M2 – three months after M1 (which generally includes neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in cases of rectal cancer; surgery in colon cancer cases; the beginning of the adjuvant treatment in patients without distant metastasis; patients in palliative treatment); M3 – six months after M1 (which generally includes patients in adjuvant or palliative treatment). In M1 were evaluated 41 caregivers, 88 caregivers in M2 and in M3 98 caregivers. Results: the MFPC who took part in the sample were mostly women, married and retired, with a low level of schooling. Over time these MFPC presented a level of self-efficacy “averagely competent“ for to carry out the activities related to taking care process. However the perception of self-efficacy for to take medication and take care of the colostomy were areas where caregivers had lower levels of self-efficacy perception. When evaluating the perception of self-efficacy depending on the processes of care, the caregivers perceived less competence to “working together with the ill person” and “navigation the healthcare system”. The MFPC that perceived greater self-efficacy over time tend to be those caring for less dependent patients, using more resources, those who care for longer, the younger caregivers and with more schooling. Conclusions: The evaluation of the perception of self-efficacy is an important indicator for nurses in monitoring the transition of exercising the role of a familiar caregiver for a patient with colorectal cancer. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-03-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.31877/on.2014.26.03 https://doi.org/10.31877/on.2014.26.03 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.31877/on.2014.26.03 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://onco.news/index.php/journal/article/view/154 https://onco.news/index.php/journal/article/view/154/160 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
AEOP – Associação de Enfermagem Oncológica Portuguesa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
AEOP – Associação de Enfermagem Oncológica Portuguesa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Onco.news; No. 26 (2014): Onco.News Journal; 21-30 Onco.News; N.º 26 (2014): Revista Onco.News; 21-30 2183-6914 1646-7868 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138187654725632 |