Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rota, M
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Alicandro, G, Pelucchi, C, Bonzi, R, Bertuccio, P, Hu, J, Zhang, ZF, Johnson, KC, Palli, D, Ferraroni, M, Yu, GP, Galeone, C, López-Carrillo, L, Muscat, J, Lunet, N, Ferro, A, Ye, W, Plymoth, A, Malekzadeh, R, Zaridze, D, Maximovitch, D, Kogevinas, M, Fernández de Larrea, N, Vioque, J, Navarrete-Muñoz, EM, Tsugane, S, Hamade GS, Hidaka, A, Pakseresht, M, Wolk, A, Håkansson, N, Hernández-Ramírez, RU, López-Cervantes, M, Ward, M, Pourfarzi, F, Mu, L, Kurtz, RC, Lagiou, A, Lagiou, P, Boffetta, P, Boccia, S, Negri, E, La, Vecchia, C
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143195
Resumo: Low socioeconomic position (SEP) is a strong risk factor for incidence and premature mortality from several cancers. Our study aimed at quantifying the association between SEP and gastric cancer (GC) risk through an individual participant data meta-analysis within the “Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project”. Educational level and household income were used as proxies for the SEP. We estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across levels of education and household income by pooling study-specific ORs through random-effects meta-analytic models. The relative index of inequality (RII) was also computed. A total of 9,773 GC cases and 24,373 controls from 25 studies from Europe, Asia and America were included. The pooled OR for the highest compared to the lowest level of education was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44–0.84), while the pooled RII was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.29–0.69). A strong inverse association was observed both for noncardia (OR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.22–0.70) and cardia GC (OR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.22–0.99). The relation was stronger among H. pylori negative subjects (RII 0.14, 95% CI, 0.04–0.48) as compared to H. pylori positive ones (RII 0.29, 95% CI, 0.10–0.84), in the absence of a significant interaction (p = 0.28). The highest household income category showed a pooled OR of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48–0.89), while the corresponding RII was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.22–0.72). Our collaborative pooled-analysis showed a strong inverse relationship between SEP indicators and GC risk. Our data call for public health interventions to reduce GC risk among the more vulnerable groups of the population.
id RCAP_ea9633a5bbbf421776607ed51e712739
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/143195
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortiumSocioeconomic inequalitiesEducationIncomeRisk factorsGastric cancerLow socioeconomic position (SEP) is a strong risk factor for incidence and premature mortality from several cancers. Our study aimed at quantifying the association between SEP and gastric cancer (GC) risk through an individual participant data meta-analysis within the “Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project”. Educational level and household income were used as proxies for the SEP. We estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across levels of education and household income by pooling study-specific ORs through random-effects meta-analytic models. The relative index of inequality (RII) was also computed. A total of 9,773 GC cases and 24,373 controls from 25 studies from Europe, Asia and America were included. The pooled OR for the highest compared to the lowest level of education was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44–0.84), while the pooled RII was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.29–0.69). A strong inverse association was observed both for noncardia (OR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.22–0.70) and cardia GC (OR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.22–0.99). The relation was stronger among H. pylori negative subjects (RII 0.14, 95% CI, 0.04–0.48) as compared to H. pylori positive ones (RII 0.29, 95% CI, 0.10–0.84), in the absence of a significant interaction (p = 0.28). The highest household income category showed a pooled OR of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48–0.89), while the corresponding RII was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.22–0.72). Our collaborative pooled-analysis showed a strong inverse relationship between SEP indicators and GC risk. Our data call for public health interventions to reduce GC risk among the more vulnerable groups of the population.Wiley20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/143195eng0020-71361097-021510.1002/ijc.32298Rota, MAlicandro, GPelucchi, CBonzi, RBertuccio, PHu, JZhang, ZFJohnson, KCPalli, DFerraroni, MYu, GPGaleone, CLópez-Carrillo, LMuscat, JLunet, NFerro, AYe, WPlymoth, AMalekzadeh, RZaridze, DMaximovitch, DKogevinas, MFernández de Larrea, NVioque, JNavarrete-Muñoz, EMTsugane, SHamade GSHidaka, APakseresht, MWolk, AHåkansson, NHernández-Ramírez, RULópez-Cervantes, MWard, MPourfarzi, FMu, LKurtz, RCLagiou, ALagiou, PBoffetta, PBoccia, SNegri, ELa, Vecchia, Cinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T15:50:33Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/143195Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:33:28.530598Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
title Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
spellingShingle Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
Rota, M
Socioeconomic inequalities
Education
Income
Risk factors
Gastric cancer
title_short Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
title_full Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
title_fullStr Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
title_full_unstemmed Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
title_sort Education and gastric cancer risk-An individual participant data meta-analysis in the StoP project consortium
author Rota, M
author_facet Rota, M
Alicandro, G
Pelucchi, C
Bonzi, R
Bertuccio, P
Hu, J
Zhang, ZF
Johnson, KC
Palli, D
Ferraroni, M
Yu, GP
Galeone, C
López-Carrillo, L
Muscat, J
Lunet, N
Ferro, A
Ye, W
Plymoth, A
Malekzadeh, R
Zaridze, D
Maximovitch, D
Kogevinas, M
Fernández de Larrea, N
Vioque, J
Navarrete-Muñoz, EM
Tsugane, S
Hamade GS
Hidaka, A
Pakseresht, M
Wolk, A
Håkansson, N
Hernández-Ramírez, RU
López-Cervantes, M
Ward, M
Pourfarzi, F
Mu, L
Kurtz, RC
Lagiou, A
Lagiou, P
Boffetta, P
Boccia, S
Negri, E
La, Vecchia, C
author_role author
author2 Alicandro, G
Pelucchi, C
Bonzi, R
Bertuccio, P
Hu, J
Zhang, ZF
Johnson, KC
Palli, D
Ferraroni, M
Yu, GP
Galeone, C
López-Carrillo, L
Muscat, J
Lunet, N
Ferro, A
Ye, W
Plymoth, A
Malekzadeh, R
Zaridze, D
Maximovitch, D
Kogevinas, M
Fernández de Larrea, N
Vioque, J
Navarrete-Muñoz, EM
Tsugane, S
Hamade GS
Hidaka, A
Pakseresht, M
Wolk, A
Håkansson, N
Hernández-Ramírez, RU
López-Cervantes, M
Ward, M
Pourfarzi, F
Mu, L
Kurtz, RC
Lagiou, A
Lagiou, P
Boffetta, P
Boccia, S
Negri, E
La, Vecchia, C
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rota, M
Alicandro, G
Pelucchi, C
Bonzi, R
Bertuccio, P
Hu, J
Zhang, ZF
Johnson, KC
Palli, D
Ferraroni, M
Yu, GP
Galeone, C
López-Carrillo, L
Muscat, J
Lunet, N
Ferro, A
Ye, W
Plymoth, A
Malekzadeh, R
Zaridze, D
Maximovitch, D
Kogevinas, M
Fernández de Larrea, N
Vioque, J
Navarrete-Muñoz, EM
Tsugane, S
Hamade GS
Hidaka, A
Pakseresht, M
Wolk, A
Håkansson, N
Hernández-Ramírez, RU
López-Cervantes, M
Ward, M
Pourfarzi, F
Mu, L
Kurtz, RC
Lagiou, A
Lagiou, P
Boffetta, P
Boccia, S
Negri, E
La, Vecchia, C
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Socioeconomic inequalities
Education
Income
Risk factors
Gastric cancer
topic Socioeconomic inequalities
Education
Income
Risk factors
Gastric cancer
description Low socioeconomic position (SEP) is a strong risk factor for incidence and premature mortality from several cancers. Our study aimed at quantifying the association between SEP and gastric cancer (GC) risk through an individual participant data meta-analysis within the “Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project”. Educational level and household income were used as proxies for the SEP. We estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across levels of education and household income by pooling study-specific ORs through random-effects meta-analytic models. The relative index of inequality (RII) was also computed. A total of 9,773 GC cases and 24,373 controls from 25 studies from Europe, Asia and America were included. The pooled OR for the highest compared to the lowest level of education was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44–0.84), while the pooled RII was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.29–0.69). A strong inverse association was observed both for noncardia (OR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.22–0.70) and cardia GC (OR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.22–0.99). The relation was stronger among H. pylori negative subjects (RII 0.14, 95% CI, 0.04–0.48) as compared to H. pylori positive ones (RII 0.29, 95% CI, 0.10–0.84), in the absence of a significant interaction (p = 0.28). The highest household income category showed a pooled OR of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48–0.89), while the corresponding RII was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.22–0.72). Our collaborative pooled-analysis showed a strong inverse relationship between SEP indicators and GC risk. Our data call for public health interventions to reduce GC risk among the more vulnerable groups of the population.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143195
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0020-7136
1097-0215
10.1002/ijc.32298
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136243839139840