Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.2825 |
Resumo: | The article starts emphasizing the fact that art is universally appreciated although, paradoxically, humanities have never achieved its thorough definition and exact sciences traditionally never considered it worth of interest. It then focuses on the problematization of art’s and aesthetic experience’s evolution in terms of reception, from the second half of the 19th century on (getting more acute in contemporaneity), at the same time and paradoxically registering on the one hand art’s contemporary mythicizing and increase in popularity and on the other a new studying interest from the exact sciences – especially neurosciences. In the light of this problematization it then analyzes and compares five recent and pioneering studies from neuroscientists and cognitive semiotics theorists on art and the aesthetic experience, registering their innovative contributes for the understanding of these themes, but also their limitations and, finally, their promising character in terms of the future. |
id |
RCAP_f09950c4aab31a1468dd0509406e8155 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2825 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitationA arte e a experiência estética clássica vs. contemporânea em recentes estudos das neurociências e da semiótica cognitiva: avanços e limitaçõesThe article starts emphasizing the fact that art is universally appreciated although, paradoxically, humanities have never achieved its thorough definition and exact sciences traditionally never considered it worth of interest. It then focuses on the problematization of art’s and aesthetic experience’s evolution in terms of reception, from the second half of the 19th century on (getting more acute in contemporaneity), at the same time and paradoxically registering on the one hand art’s contemporary mythicizing and increase in popularity and on the other a new studying interest from the exact sciences – especially neurosciences. In the light of this problematization it then analyzes and compares five recent and pioneering studies from neuroscientists and cognitive semiotics theorists on art and the aesthetic experience, registering their innovative contributes for the understanding of these themes, but also their limitations and, finally, their promising character in terms of the future.Este artigo começa por realçar a universal valorização da arte num quadro tradicional e paradoxal em que as ciências humanas não logram a sua cabal definição e as ciências exatas não a consideram digna de interesse. Foca depois a problematização da evolução da arte e da experiência estética a partir da segunda metade do séc. XIX relativamente à sua receção, que se agudiza na contemporaneidade, registando, paradoxal e paralelamente, por um lado um aumento da sua popularidade e mitificação, por outro uma mudança de posicionamento das ciências exatas que, sobretudo através das neurociências, lhe passam a dedicar estudos. À luz desta problematização, analisa de seguida e compara cinco estudos pioneiros e recentes de neurocientistas e teóricos da semiótica cognitiva sobre a arte e a experiência estética, registando os seus contributos inovadores para a compreensão das mesmas, mas também as suas limitações – e, por fim, o seu caráter promissor em termos de futuro.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.2825https://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.2825Cadernos de Saúde; Vol 5 No 1-2 (2012); 7-14Cadernos de Saúde; v. 5 n. 1-2 (2012); 7-142795-43581647-055910.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.5.1-2reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/cadernosdesaude/article/view/2825https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/cadernosdesaude/article/view/2825/2729Direitos de Autor (c) 2012 Leonor Sáhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSá, Leonor2023-10-03T15:47:35Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/2825Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:32:54.589508Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation A arte e a experiência estética clássica vs. contemporânea em recentes estudos das neurociências e da semiótica cognitiva: avanços e limitações |
title |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation |
spellingShingle |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation Sá, Leonor |
title_short |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation |
title_full |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation |
title_fullStr |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation |
title_sort |
Art and the classical vs. contemporary aesthetic experience in recent studies of neuroscience and cognitive semiotics: advances and limitation |
author |
Sá, Leonor |
author_facet |
Sá, Leonor |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sá, Leonor |
description |
The article starts emphasizing the fact that art is universally appreciated although, paradoxically, humanities have never achieved its thorough definition and exact sciences traditionally never considered it worth of interest. It then focuses on the problematization of art’s and aesthetic experience’s evolution in terms of reception, from the second half of the 19th century on (getting more acute in contemporaneity), at the same time and paradoxically registering on the one hand art’s contemporary mythicizing and increase in popularity and on the other a new studying interest from the exact sciences – especially neurosciences. In the light of this problematization it then analyzes and compares five recent and pioneering studies from neuroscientists and cognitive semiotics theorists on art and the aesthetic experience, registering their innovative contributes for the understanding of these themes, but also their limitations and, finally, their promising character in terms of the future. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.2825 https://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.2825 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.2825 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/cadernosdesaude/article/view/2825 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/cadernosdesaude/article/view/2825/2729 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2012 Leonor Sá http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2012 Leonor Sá http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Saúde; Vol 5 No 1-2 (2012); 7-14 Cadernos de Saúde; v. 5 n. 1-2 (2012); 7-14 2795-4358 1647-0559 10.34632/cadernosdesaude.2012.5.1-2 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133594845708289 |