Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barros, José d'Assunção Barros
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i15.9783
Resumo: In the ambit of studies about Social Inequalities and Differences, two general positions make a meaningful contrast in relation to possible conceptions about ʺSlaveryʺ. On one hand, the notion of Slavery is opposed to the idea of ʺLibertyʺ under such a perspective that establishes an opposition based in contradiction, which also implies that Slavery is considered as an ʺInequalityʺ — in this case, a ʺRadical Inequalityʺ. On the other hand, the notion of Slavery is contrasted with the idea of Liberty in the sense of a relation between contraries, which offers the possibility to conceive Slavery merely as a ʺDifferenceʺ. This article discusses the various contrasts between the two positions, with the aim of showing the dislocation between both perspectives under Modern Colonial Slavery and of comparing it, alternatively, with the notion and practice of Slavery in the Ancient World, as well as in several systems of Slavery in Pre-Colonial Africa.
id RCAP_f97e876542d29d8ab4a309fbe79cb5b2
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/9783
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and modernsEscravidão clássica e escravidão moderna. Desigualdade e diferença no pensamento escravista: uma comparação entre os antigos e os modernosIn the ambit of studies about Social Inequalities and Differences, two general positions make a meaningful contrast in relation to possible conceptions about ʺSlaveryʺ. On one hand, the notion of Slavery is opposed to the idea of ʺLibertyʺ under such a perspective that establishes an opposition based in contradiction, which also implies that Slavery is considered as an ʺInequalityʺ — in this case, a ʺRadical Inequalityʺ. On the other hand, the notion of Slavery is contrasted with the idea of Liberty in the sense of a relation between contraries, which offers the possibility to conceive Slavery merely as a ʺDifferenceʺ. This article discusses the various contrasts between the two positions, with the aim of showing the dislocation between both perspectives under Modern Colonial Slavery and of comparing it, alternatively, with the notion and practice of Slavery in the Ancient World, as well as in several systems of Slavery in Pre-Colonial Africa.En el ámbito de estudios sobre Desigualdades Sociales y Diferencias se enfrentan dos posiciones más generales en relación a posibles concepciones de la Esclavitud. Por un lado, la noción de Esclavitud se puede oponer a la de Libertad en una perspectiva que establece una oposición por contradicción, lo que implica que la Esclavitud sea contemplada bajo esta perspectiva como Desigualdad — en este caso, una Desi‐gualdad Radical. Por otro lado, la noción de Esclavitud se contrapone a la de Libertad bajo la forma de una relación de contrariedad que permite entrever la Esclavitud como Diferencia. El artículo examina el contraste entre las dos posiciones, mostrando el desli‐zamiento de una perspectiva a otra en la formación del moderno Régimen Colonial Esclavista y comparándolo, alternativamente, con la Esclavitud Antigua y con sistemas de esclavitud en el África precolonial.Dans le domaine des études sur les Inégalités et Différences Sociales, deux positions contrastent en ce qui concerne les conceptions de l’esclavage. D’un côté, celle qui défend que la notion d’esclavage peut être à l’opposé de celle de liberté, dans une perspective qui vise établir une opposition par contradiction, l’esclavage étant considéré inégalité, — plus précisément inégalité radicale. D’un autre côté, la notion d’esclavage s’oppose à celle de liberté dans une relation de contrariété qui permet de concevoir l’esclavage comme une différence. L’article se développe autour du contraste entre ces deux oppositions, en montrant le déplacement de l’une des perspectives vers l’autre dans la formation de l’esclavage colonial moderne, en le comparant, alternativement, à l’esclavage ancien et aux systèmes d’esclavage en Afrique pré‐coloniale.No âmbito de estudos sobre Desigualdades Sociais e Diferenças, duas posições mais gerais se contrastam com relação a possíveis concepções sobre a Escravidão. De um lado, a noção de Escravidão pode ser oposta à de Liberdade em uma perspectiva que estabelece uma oposição por contradição, implicando em que a Escravidão seja aqui vista como Desigualdade — no caso uma Desigualdade Radical. De outro lado, a noção de Escravidão contrapõe‐se à de Liberdade à maneira de uma relação de contrariedade que permite enxergar a Escravidão como Diferença. O artigo discorre sobre o contraste entre as duas posições, mostrando o deslocamento de uma perspectiva para outra na formação do moderno Escravismo Colonial, e comparando-o, alternadamente, com a Escravidão Antiga e com sistemas de escravidão na África précolonial.Universidade de Aveiro2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i15.9783https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i15.9783Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 15 (2013); 195-230Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; Núm. 15 (2013); 195-230Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 15 (2013); 195-230Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; n.º 15 (2013); 195-2302183-43340874-5498reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/9783https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/9783/6375Barros, José d'Assunção Barrosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-15T19:25:10Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/9783Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:03:10.358522Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
Escravidão clássica e escravidão moderna. Desigualdade e diferença no pensamento escravista: uma comparação entre os antigos e os modernos
title Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
spellingShingle Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
Barros, José d'Assunção Barros
title_short Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
title_full Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
title_fullStr Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
title_full_unstemmed Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
title_sort Classical slavery and modern slavery. Inequality and difference in the thought on slavery: a comparison between ancients and moderns
author Barros, José d'Assunção Barros
author_facet Barros, José d'Assunção Barros
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barros, José d'Assunção Barros
description In the ambit of studies about Social Inequalities and Differences, two general positions make a meaningful contrast in relation to possible conceptions about ʺSlaveryʺ. On one hand, the notion of Slavery is opposed to the idea of ʺLibertyʺ under such a perspective that establishes an opposition based in contradiction, which also implies that Slavery is considered as an ʺInequalityʺ — in this case, a ʺRadical Inequalityʺ. On the other hand, the notion of Slavery is contrasted with the idea of Liberty in the sense of a relation between contraries, which offers the possibility to conceive Slavery merely as a ʺDifferenceʺ. This article discusses the various contrasts between the two positions, with the aim of showing the dislocation between both perspectives under Modern Colonial Slavery and of comparing it, alternatively, with the notion and practice of Slavery in the Ancient World, as well as in several systems of Slavery in Pre-Colonial Africa.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i15.9783
https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i15.9783
url https://doi.org/10.34624/agora.v0i15.9783
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/9783
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/agora/article/view/9783/6375
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 15 (2013); 195-230
Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; Núm. 15 (2013); 195-230
Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; No 15 (2013); 195-230
Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em Debate; n.º 15 (2013); 195-230
2183-4334
0874-5498
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130495720620032