Common law positivism through civil law eyes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61840 |
Resumo: | The paper purports to argue for two theses: 1. common law theories of legal positivism take “the separation thesis” as encompassing both meta- theoretical and theoretical claims, while civil law theories of legal positivism take it as dwelling entirely on a meta-theoretical level; 2. common law theories of legal positivism, in arguing for the theoretical separation between law and morals also as a riposte to Dworkin’s critiques, have made a claim concerning the limits of the law that is at odds with the separation thesis as a meta-theoretical claim. The paper proceeds in two steps. The first step argues for the first thesis by providing a brief comparative account of common law and civil law theories of legal positivism, as instanced by Herbert Hart and Norberto Bobbio, respectively. The second step argues for the second thesis by analysing the Hartian, inclusivist and exclusivist varieties of legal positivism from the standpoint of their way of solving the law and morality puzzle. |
id |
RCAP_faa88862a5ef2db94cb3c084effed86e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/61840 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Common law positivism through civil law eyesDireito civilThe paper purports to argue for two theses: 1. common law theories of legal positivism take “the separation thesis” as encompassing both meta- theoretical and theoretical claims, while civil law theories of legal positivism take it as dwelling entirely on a meta-theoretical level; 2. common law theories of legal positivism, in arguing for the theoretical separation between law and morals also as a riposte to Dworkin’s critiques, have made a claim concerning the limits of the law that is at odds with the separation thesis as a meta-theoretical claim. The paper proceeds in two steps. The first step argues for the first thesis by providing a brief comparative account of common law and civil law theories of legal positivism, as instanced by Herbert Hart and Norberto Bobbio, respectively. The second step argues for the second thesis by analysing the Hartian, inclusivist and exclusivist varieties of legal positivism from the standpoint of their way of solving the law and morality puzzle.Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de LisboaRepositório da Universidade de LisboaChiassoni, Pierluigi2024-01-16T23:23:03Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/61840engIn: Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa: Lisbon Law Review, Vol. 61, n.º 2 (2020), 0870-3116. - p. 53-780870-3116info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-22T01:20:43Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/61840Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:56:17.948508Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes |
title |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes |
spellingShingle |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes Chiassoni, Pierluigi Direito civil |
title_short |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes |
title_full |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes |
title_fullStr |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes |
title_sort |
Common law positivism through civil law eyes |
author |
Chiassoni, Pierluigi |
author_facet |
Chiassoni, Pierluigi |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chiassoni, Pierluigi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito civil |
topic |
Direito civil |
description |
The paper purports to argue for two theses: 1. common law theories of legal positivism take “the separation thesis” as encompassing both meta- theoretical and theoretical claims, while civil law theories of legal positivism take it as dwelling entirely on a meta-theoretical level; 2. common law theories of legal positivism, in arguing for the theoretical separation between law and morals also as a riposte to Dworkin’s critiques, have made a claim concerning the limits of the law that is at odds with the separation thesis as a meta-theoretical claim. The paper proceeds in two steps. The first step argues for the first thesis by providing a brief comparative account of common law and civil law theories of legal positivism, as instanced by Herbert Hart and Norberto Bobbio, respectively. The second step argues for the second thesis by analysing the Hartian, inclusivist and exclusivist varieties of legal positivism from the standpoint of their way of solving the law and morality puzzle. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z 2024-01-16T23:23:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61840 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61840 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
In: Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa: Lisbon Law Review, Vol. 61, n.º 2 (2020), 0870-3116. - p. 53-78 0870-3116 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137051721859072 |