The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/179 |
Resumo: | This article discusses de problem of truth as it is presented within the discourse of Law. It contains arguments that point towards a "need for anthropology" in a scientific approach to solving problems under that which some call "the science of the law", or jurisprudence. To illustrate this argument, we utilize empirical data that support the necessity for a more ample and more scientific openess to the diverse within law's epistemology. |
id |
RPED-1_33eb901d0df87c3b66e2864f40167a77 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/179 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to LawTruthsJudicial SystemepistemologyThis article discusses de problem of truth as it is presented within the discourse of Law. It contains arguments that point towards a "need for anthropology" in a scientific approach to solving problems under that which some call "the science of the law", or jurisprudence. To illustrate this argument, we utilize empirical data that support the necessity for a more ample and more scientific openess to the diverse within law's epistemology.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2018-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTheory; empirical researchapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/17910.19092/reed.v5i1.179Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 5 n. 1 (2018): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v5i1reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDenghttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/179/pdf_33Capela, Gustavoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:22:12Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/179Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:22:12Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law |
title |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law |
spellingShingle |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law Capela, Gustavo Truths Judicial System epistemology |
title_short |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law |
title_full |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law |
title_fullStr |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law |
title_sort |
The possible truths: the importance of Anthropology to Law |
author |
Capela, Gustavo |
author_facet |
Capela, Gustavo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Capela, Gustavo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Truths Judicial System epistemology |
topic |
Truths Judicial System epistemology |
description |
This article discusses de problem of truth as it is presented within the discourse of Law. It contains arguments that point towards a "need for anthropology" in a scientific approach to solving problems under that which some call "the science of the law", or jurisprudence. To illustrate this argument, we utilize empirical data that support the necessity for a more ample and more scientific openess to the diverse within law's epistemology. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Theory; empirical research |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/179 10.19092/reed.v5i1.179 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/179 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v5i1.179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/179/pdf_33 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 5 n. 1 (2018): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v5i1 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703127347200 |