THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Balbi, Guilherme, Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645
Resumo: The article presents an exploratory case study on the response of Latin American constitutional courts to COVID-19 in adverse political scenarios, focusing on the experiences of Brazil and Mexico. Based on the analysis of jurisprudence and interviews with Human Rights activists and researchers from Latin American think tanks, we seek to reflect on the strategic choices that such bodies face about whether or not to position themselves in crisis scenarios, facing trade-offs such as support of public opinion, challenges of decision-making implementation and the maintenance of unity and consistency of position within the Judiciary. It is concluded that, even when persistent implementation challenges are present, such decisions represent an important stimulus and reinforce institutional pressures for political reaction in times of crisis. However, for the courts, the benefits related to the strengthening of social legitimacy and their institutional roles are not as evident.
id RPED-1_3bb87daef9d27dfcdafd2bac0adc8224
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/645
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICOA resposta de Cortes Constitucionais Latino-americanas à COVID-19: estudo comparado das experiências do Brasil e do MéxicoCOVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice.COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana.The article presents an exploratory case study on the response of Latin American constitutional courts to COVID-19 in adverse political scenarios, focusing on the experiences of Brazil and Mexico. Based on the analysis of jurisprudence and interviews with Human Rights activists and researchers from Latin American think tanks, we seek to reflect on the strategic choices that such bodies face about whether or not to position themselves in crisis scenarios, facing trade-offs such as support of public opinion, challenges of decision-making implementation and the maintenance of unity and consistency of position within the Judiciary. It is concluded that, even when persistent implementation challenges are present, such decisions represent an important stimulus and reinforce institutional pressures for political reaction in times of crisis. However, for the courts, the benefits related to the strengthening of social legitimacy and their institutional roles are not as evident.O artigo apresenta um estudo de caso exploratório sobre a resposta de cortes constitucionais latinoamericanas à COVID-19 em cenários políticos adversos com foco nas experiências de Brasil e México. A partir da análise da jurisprudência e de entrevistas com ativistas de Direitos Humanos e pesquisadores de think tanks latinoamericanos, busca-se refletir sobre as escolhas estratégicas que tais órgãos enfrentam sobre posicionar-se ou não em cenários de crise, frente a trade-offs como o apoio da opinião pública, desafios de implementação decisória e a manutenção de unidade e coerência de posicionamento dentro do próprio Judiciário. Conclui-se que, mesmo quando presentes desafios persistentes de implementação, tais decisões representam importante estímulo e reforçam pressões institucionais para a reação política em momentos de crise. Todavia, para as cortes, não são tão evidentes os benefícios relacionados ao fortalecimento da legitimidade social e de seus papéis institucionais.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2022-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/64510.19092/reed.v10.645Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-35Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-352319-081710.19092/reed.v9reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645/414Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDenari Gomes de Mattos, KarinaBalbi, GuilhermeMastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura 2023-04-04T15:11:03Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/645Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2023-04-04T15:11:03Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
A resposta de Cortes Constitucionais Latino-americanas à COVID-19: estudo comparado das experiências do Brasil e do México
title THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
spellingShingle THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina
COVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice.
COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana.
title_short THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
title_full THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
title_fullStr THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
title_full_unstemmed THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
title_sort THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
author Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina
author_facet Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina
Balbi, Guilherme
Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura
author_role author
author2 Balbi, Guilherme
Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina
Balbi, Guilherme
Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice.
COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana.
topic COVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice.
COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana.
description The article presents an exploratory case study on the response of Latin American constitutional courts to COVID-19 in adverse political scenarios, focusing on the experiences of Brazil and Mexico. Based on the analysis of jurisprudence and interviews with Human Rights activists and researchers from Latin American think tanks, we seek to reflect on the strategic choices that such bodies face about whether or not to position themselves in crisis scenarios, facing trade-offs such as support of public opinion, challenges of decision-making implementation and the maintenance of unity and consistency of position within the Judiciary. It is concluded that, even when persistent implementation challenges are present, such decisions represent an important stimulus and reinforce institutional pressures for political reaction in times of crisis. However, for the courts, the benefits related to the strengthening of social legitimacy and their institutional roles are not as evident.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645
10.19092/reed.v10.645
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v10.645
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645/414
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-35
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-35
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v9
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138702502395904