“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/235 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this work was to reflect on the role of the justice system’s institutions in confronting racism. We conducted an ethnography of the Racial Equality Working Group Professor Joel Rufino dos Santos ofthe Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo, a group created to deal with the subject within the MP-SP, between September 2014 and March 2016. The Racial Equality Working Group prioritized the training of its members to identify the reproduction of racism on the daily activities of the institution. The Group also sought to raise the participants’ awareness about their own role on the perpetuation of racism. In addition to training programs, this research discussed important measures to fight racism in the justice system’s institutions: the implementation of racial quotas; the collection, analysis and dissemination of data regarding cases related to the black population; and the establishment of institutional guidelines and specific departments to address this theme. This work also identified numerous difficulties faced by the Group: the strong rejection to the adoption of racial quotas by the prosecutors, the hierarchical institutional structure, the lack of dialogue with social movements, the excessive valorization of the prosecutor’s functional independence, and the inherent contradictions of the MP’s institutional design - the MP acts at the same time on criminal prosecution and on the promotion of civil rights. Despite the progress made by the Group,there is still a long way to go in order to confront the various manifestations of racism within the justice system. |
id |
RPED-1_60864ff42c987d51fd753317cb8a0b1f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/235 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo"Somos Racistas?" Enfrentando o racismo institucional no Ministério Público de São PauloThe purpose of this work was to reflect on the role of the justice system’s institutions in confronting racism. We conducted an ethnography of the Racial Equality Working Group Professor Joel Rufino dos Santos ofthe Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo, a group created to deal with the subject within the MP-SP, between September 2014 and March 2016. The Racial Equality Working Group prioritized the training of its members to identify the reproduction of racism on the daily activities of the institution. The Group also sought to raise the participants’ awareness about their own role on the perpetuation of racism. In addition to training programs, this research discussed important measures to fight racism in the justice system’s institutions: the implementation of racial quotas; the collection, analysis and dissemination of data regarding cases related to the black population; and the establishment of institutional guidelines and specific departments to address this theme. This work also identified numerous difficulties faced by the Group: the strong rejection to the adoption of racial quotas by the prosecutors, the hierarchical institutional structure, the lack of dialogue with social movements, the excessive valorization of the prosecutor’s functional independence, and the inherent contradictions of the MP’s institutional design - the MP acts at the same time on criminal prosecution and on the promotion of civil rights. Despite the progress made by the Group,there is still a long way to go in order to confront the various manifestations of racism within the justice system.O objetivo deste trabalho foi refletir sobre o papel das instituições do sistema de justiça no enfrentamento ao racismo. Foi realizada uma etnografia do Grupo de Trabalho da Igualdade Racial Professor Joel Rufino dos Santos do Ministério Público de São Paulo, grupo criado especificamente para tratar do assunto no âmbito do MP-SP, entre setembro de 2014 e março de 2016. O GT-Igualdade Racial priorizou capacitar seus integrantes para identificar a reprodução do racismo no funcionamento cotidiano da própria instituição. O Grupo também buscou sensibilizar seus participantes a perceberem seu papel individual na manutenção do racismo. Além de estratégias de capacitação, a partir dessa pesquisa foi possível elencar importantes medidas de combate ao racismo nas instituições do sistema de justiça: a implementação de cotas raciais; a coleta, a análise e divulgação de dados sobre casos relacionados à população negra; e o estabelecimento de diretrizes institucionais e órgãos especializados no tema. Este trabalho também identificou inúmeras dificuldades enfrentadas pelo Grupo, como a grande rejeição dos promotores e procuradores às cotas raciais, a estrutura institucional hierárquica, a ausência de canais de diálogo com movimentos sociais, a excessiva valorização da independência funcional, e as contradições decorrentes do desenho institucional do MP, com atribuições ao mesmo tempo de acusação penal e promoção de direitos. Apesar dos avanços conseguidos pela atuação do GT-IR, ainda resta um longo caminho a ser percorrido para combater as diversas manifestações do racismo dentro do sistema de justiça. Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/23510.19092/reed.v6i3.235Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 81-110Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 81-1102319-081710.19092/reed.v6i3reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/235/230Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNudel Radomysler, Clio2020-01-31T02:31:54Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/235Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-01-31T02:31:54Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo "Somos Racistas?" Enfrentando o racismo institucional no Ministério Público de São Paulo |
title |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo |
spellingShingle |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo Nudel Radomysler, Clio |
title_short |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo |
title_full |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo |
title_fullStr |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo |
title_sort |
“Are we racists?" Facing institutional racism in the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo |
author |
Nudel Radomysler, Clio |
author_facet |
Nudel Radomysler, Clio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nudel Radomysler, Clio |
description |
The purpose of this work was to reflect on the role of the justice system’s institutions in confronting racism. We conducted an ethnography of the Racial Equality Working Group Professor Joel Rufino dos Santos ofthe Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo, a group created to deal with the subject within the MP-SP, between September 2014 and March 2016. The Racial Equality Working Group prioritized the training of its members to identify the reproduction of racism on the daily activities of the institution. The Group also sought to raise the participants’ awareness about their own role on the perpetuation of racism. In addition to training programs, this research discussed important measures to fight racism in the justice system’s institutions: the implementation of racial quotas; the collection, analysis and dissemination of data regarding cases related to the black population; and the establishment of institutional guidelines and specific departments to address this theme. This work also identified numerous difficulties faced by the Group: the strong rejection to the adoption of racial quotas by the prosecutors, the hierarchical institutional structure, the lack of dialogue with social movements, the excessive valorization of the prosecutor’s functional independence, and the inherent contradictions of the MP’s institutional design - the MP acts at the same time on criminal prosecution and on the promotion of civil rights. Despite the progress made by the Group,there is still a long way to go in order to confront the various manifestations of racism within the justice system. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/235 10.19092/reed.v6i3.235 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/235 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v6i3.235 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/235/230 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 81-110 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 81-110 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v6i3 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703463940096 |