The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407
Resumo: The research objective is to analyze the interaction of the CNJ with the state courts in order to improve the efficiency levels of the State Justice from 2004 to 2013 from the perspective of ex-councilors. The main questions to be answered were: How have the efforts and actions taken by the State Courts fit the CNJ’s requirements aimed at improving the efficiency of the jurisdictional provision? To what extent has there been a convergence of efforts and results achieved between the CNJ and the State Courts to improve efficiency? Twenty ex-councilors were interviewed, adopting thematic or categorical analysis as the main form of content analysis technique. The categories established for analysis were related to the predominance of divergence (distrust and resistance), the predominance of convergence (acceptance and integration) and the alternation of scenarios (relativism and context of autonomy). In general, respondents pointed to the existence of a convergence of efforts between the CNJ and the State Courts that was being strengthened as the ignorance and distrust about the CNJ gradually dissipated. It was noticed that the relationship of convergence and divergence presents alternations, because the understanding varies according to the perception of loss of autonomy by the courts.
id RPED-1_8a248424a3f490f8c291e248a30d3735
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/407
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013A gestão do Poder Judiciário sob a ótica de ex-conselheiros: análise da relação entre o CNJ e a Justiça Estadual de 2004 a 2013The research objective is to analyze the interaction of the CNJ with the state courts in order to improve the efficiency levels of the State Justice from 2004 to 2013 from the perspective of ex-councilors. The main questions to be answered were: How have the efforts and actions taken by the State Courts fit the CNJ’s requirements aimed at improving the efficiency of the jurisdictional provision? To what extent has there been a convergence of efforts and results achieved between the CNJ and the State Courts to improve efficiency? Twenty ex-councilors were interviewed, adopting thematic or categorical analysis as the main form of content analysis technique. The categories established for analysis were related to the predominance of divergence (distrust and resistance), the predominance of convergence (acceptance and integration) and the alternation of scenarios (relativism and context of autonomy). In general, respondents pointed to the existence of a convergence of efforts between the CNJ and the State Courts that was being strengthened as the ignorance and distrust about the CNJ gradually dissipated. It was noticed that the relationship of convergence and divergence presents alternations, because the understanding varies according to the perception of loss of autonomy by the courts.O objetivo de pesquisa consiste em analisar a interação do CNJ com os tribunais estaduais em busca de melhorar os níveis de eficiência da Justiça Estadual no período de 2004 a 2013 na ótica dos ex-conselheiros. Os principais questionamentos a serem respondidos foram:  De que forma os esforços e ações realizados pelos Tribunais de Justiça estaduais para se adequaram as exigências do CNJ visando à melhoria da eficiência da prestação jurisdicional? Em que medida tem ocorrido uma convergência de esforços e alcance de resultados entre o CNJ e os Tribunais Estaduais para a melhoria da eficiência? Foram entrevistados 20 ex-conselheiros, adotando-se a análise temática ou categorial como forma principal de técnica de análise de conteúdo. As categorias estabelecidas para análises foram relacionadas ao predomínio de divergência (desconfiança e resistências), ao predomínio de convergência (aceitação e integração) e à alternância de cenários (relativismo e contexto de autonomia). De forma geral, os respondentes apontaram a existência de uma convergência de esforços entre o CNJ e os Tribunais de Justiça estaduais que foi sendo fortalecida na medida em que o desconhecimento e a desconfiança sobre o CNJ foram se dissipando. Percebeu-se que a relação de convergência e divergência apresenta alternâncias cíclicas, pois o entendimento alterar conforme a percepção de perda de autonomia por parte dos tribunais.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/40710.19092/reed.v6i3.407Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 194-211Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 194-2112319-081710.19092/reed.v6i3reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407/233Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Leonel Gois Lima2020-01-31T02:46:11Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/407Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-01-31T02:46:11Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
A gestão do Poder Judiciário sob a ótica de ex-conselheiros: análise da relação entre o CNJ e a Justiça Estadual de 2004 a 2013
title The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
spellingShingle The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
title_short The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
title_full The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
title_fullStr The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
title_full_unstemmed The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
title_sort The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
author Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
author_facet Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima
description The research objective is to analyze the interaction of the CNJ with the state courts in order to improve the efficiency levels of the State Justice from 2004 to 2013 from the perspective of ex-councilors. The main questions to be answered were: How have the efforts and actions taken by the State Courts fit the CNJ’s requirements aimed at improving the efficiency of the jurisdictional provision? To what extent has there been a convergence of efforts and results achieved between the CNJ and the State Courts to improve efficiency? Twenty ex-councilors were interviewed, adopting thematic or categorical analysis as the main form of content analysis technique. The categories established for analysis were related to the predominance of divergence (distrust and resistance), the predominance of convergence (acceptance and integration) and the alternation of scenarios (relativism and context of autonomy). In general, respondents pointed to the existence of a convergence of efforts between the CNJ and the State Courts that was being strengthened as the ignorance and distrust about the CNJ gradually dissipated. It was noticed that the relationship of convergence and divergence presents alternations, because the understanding varies according to the perception of loss of autonomy by the courts.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407
10.19092/reed.v6i3.407
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v6i3.407
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407/233
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 194-211
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 194-211
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v6i3
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703609692160