The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407 |
Resumo: | The research objective is to analyze the interaction of the CNJ with the state courts in order to improve the efficiency levels of the State Justice from 2004 to 2013 from the perspective of ex-councilors. The main questions to be answered were: How have the efforts and actions taken by the State Courts fit the CNJ’s requirements aimed at improving the efficiency of the jurisdictional provision? To what extent has there been a convergence of efforts and results achieved between the CNJ and the State Courts to improve efficiency? Twenty ex-councilors were interviewed, adopting thematic or categorical analysis as the main form of content analysis technique. The categories established for analysis were related to the predominance of divergence (distrust and resistance), the predominance of convergence (acceptance and integration) and the alternation of scenarios (relativism and context of autonomy). In general, respondents pointed to the existence of a convergence of efforts between the CNJ and the State Courts that was being strengthened as the ignorance and distrust about the CNJ gradually dissipated. It was noticed that the relationship of convergence and divergence presents alternations, because the understanding varies according to the perception of loss of autonomy by the courts. |
id |
RPED-1_8a248424a3f490f8c291e248a30d3735 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/407 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013A gestão do Poder Judiciário sob a ótica de ex-conselheiros: análise da relação entre o CNJ e a Justiça Estadual de 2004 a 2013The research objective is to analyze the interaction of the CNJ with the state courts in order to improve the efficiency levels of the State Justice from 2004 to 2013 from the perspective of ex-councilors. The main questions to be answered were: How have the efforts and actions taken by the State Courts fit the CNJ’s requirements aimed at improving the efficiency of the jurisdictional provision? To what extent has there been a convergence of efforts and results achieved between the CNJ and the State Courts to improve efficiency? Twenty ex-councilors were interviewed, adopting thematic or categorical analysis as the main form of content analysis technique. The categories established for analysis were related to the predominance of divergence (distrust and resistance), the predominance of convergence (acceptance and integration) and the alternation of scenarios (relativism and context of autonomy). In general, respondents pointed to the existence of a convergence of efforts between the CNJ and the State Courts that was being strengthened as the ignorance and distrust about the CNJ gradually dissipated. It was noticed that the relationship of convergence and divergence presents alternations, because the understanding varies according to the perception of loss of autonomy by the courts.O objetivo de pesquisa consiste em analisar a interação do CNJ com os tribunais estaduais em busca de melhorar os níveis de eficiência da Justiça Estadual no período de 2004 a 2013 na ótica dos ex-conselheiros. Os principais questionamentos a serem respondidos foram: De que forma os esforços e ações realizados pelos Tribunais de Justiça estaduais para se adequaram as exigências do CNJ visando à melhoria da eficiência da prestação jurisdicional? Em que medida tem ocorrido uma convergência de esforços e alcance de resultados entre o CNJ e os Tribunais Estaduais para a melhoria da eficiência? Foram entrevistados 20 ex-conselheiros, adotando-se a análise temática ou categorial como forma principal de técnica de análise de conteúdo. As categorias estabelecidas para análises foram relacionadas ao predomínio de divergência (desconfiança e resistências), ao predomínio de convergência (aceitação e integração) e à alternância de cenários (relativismo e contexto de autonomia). De forma geral, os respondentes apontaram a existência de uma convergência de esforços entre o CNJ e os Tribunais de Justiça estaduais que foi sendo fortalecida na medida em que o desconhecimento e a desconfiança sobre o CNJ foram se dissipando. Percebeu-se que a relação de convergência e divergência apresenta alternâncias cíclicas, pois o entendimento alterar conforme a percepção de perda de autonomia por parte dos tribunais.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/40710.19092/reed.v6i3.407Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 194-211Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 194-2112319-081710.19092/reed.v6i3reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407/233Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Leonel Gois Lima2020-01-31T02:46:11Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/407Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-01-31T02:46:11Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 A gestão do Poder Judiciário sob a ótica de ex-conselheiros: análise da relação entre o CNJ e a Justiça Estadual de 2004 a 2013 |
title |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 |
spellingShingle |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima |
title_short |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 |
title_full |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 |
title_fullStr |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 |
title_sort |
The judicial branch management from the perspective of excouncilors: Analysis of the Relationship between the CNJ and the State Court from 2004 to 2013 |
author |
Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Leonel Gois Lima |
description |
The research objective is to analyze the interaction of the CNJ with the state courts in order to improve the efficiency levels of the State Justice from 2004 to 2013 from the perspective of ex-councilors. The main questions to be answered were: How have the efforts and actions taken by the State Courts fit the CNJ’s requirements aimed at improving the efficiency of the jurisdictional provision? To what extent has there been a convergence of efforts and results achieved between the CNJ and the State Courts to improve efficiency? Twenty ex-councilors were interviewed, adopting thematic or categorical analysis as the main form of content analysis technique. The categories established for analysis were related to the predominance of divergence (distrust and resistance), the predominance of convergence (acceptance and integration) and the alternation of scenarios (relativism and context of autonomy). In general, respondents pointed to the existence of a convergence of efforts between the CNJ and the State Courts that was being strengthened as the ignorance and distrust about the CNJ gradually dissipated. It was noticed that the relationship of convergence and divergence presents alternations, because the understanding varies according to the perception of loss of autonomy by the courts. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407 10.19092/reed.v6i3.407 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v6i3.407 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/407/233 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 194-211 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 194-211 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v6i3 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703609692160 |