Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81 |
Resumo: | This article aims to present an overview of inter- national and national empirical studies on senten- cing. We aim to show this field’s trajectory, its main discussions and findings as well as its “blind spots”. The main goal of this article is to draw attention to how this field of research allows us to think about the problem of the disparity on sentencing as a criminal justice operation pattern. This problem has been identified by many studies, but also by the social re- presentation of the criminal justice. From a literature review on sentencing and an analysis of the main stu- dies identified, this article proposes a new direction to understand the problem of disparity on sentencing in criminal justice and indicates a new subject to be explored as well as new empirical research possibili- ties on sentencing. |
id |
RPED-1_915868659d053999fde5e25e3de2c49d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/81 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motivesAs pesquisas sobre o “sentencing”: disparidade, punição e vocabulários de motivosProdução decisóriadisparidadejustiça criminalpuniçãopositivismlegal sciencelegal discourselegal fieldSocial TheoryThis article aims to present an overview of inter- national and national empirical studies on senten- cing. We aim to show this field’s trajectory, its main discussions and findings as well as its “blind spots”. The main goal of this article is to draw attention to how this field of research allows us to think about the problem of the disparity on sentencing as a criminal justice operation pattern. This problem has been identified by many studies, but also by the social re- presentation of the criminal justice. From a literature review on sentencing and an analysis of the main stu- dies identified, this article proposes a new direction to understand the problem of disparity on sentencing in criminal justice and indicates a new subject to be explored as well as new empirical research possibili- ties on sentencing.O presente artigo propõe-se a traçar um panorama das pesquisas empíricas, estrangeiras e nacionais, so- bre o processo de determinação da pena pela justiça criminal, o “sentencing”. Apontamos a trajetória des- se campo, suas principais conclusões, bem como os pontos cegos de tais estudos. O objetivo é descrever os caminhos desse conjunto de pesquisas de modo a mostrar como os mesmos nos possibilitam refletir sobre a problemática do padrão de funcionamento desigual da justiça criminal apontado não somente por muitos estudos, mas também pelo imaginário so- cial sobre a justiça criminal. A partir do levantamento da literatura sobre o tema, bem como da análise dos principais trabalhos apontados, propomos uma re- qualificação do problema da disparidade das senten- ças criminais, bem como indicamos um novo objeto a ser explorado e, assim, para novas possibilidades de pesquisa empírica sobre o sentencing.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2015-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/8110.19092/reed.v2i2.81Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 2 n. 2 (2015): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v2i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81/73Raupp, Marianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:24:28Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/81Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:24:28Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives As pesquisas sobre o “sentencing”: disparidade, punição e vocabulários de motivos |
title |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives |
spellingShingle |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives Raupp, Mariana Produção decisória disparidade justiça criminal punição positivism legal science legal discourse legal field Social Theory |
title_short |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives |
title_full |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives |
title_fullStr |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives |
title_sort |
Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives |
author |
Raupp, Mariana |
author_facet |
Raupp, Mariana |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Raupp, Mariana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Produção decisória disparidade justiça criminal punição positivism legal science legal discourse legal field Social Theory |
topic |
Produção decisória disparidade justiça criminal punição positivism legal science legal discourse legal field Social Theory |
description |
This article aims to present an overview of inter- national and national empirical studies on senten- cing. We aim to show this field’s trajectory, its main discussions and findings as well as its “blind spots”. The main goal of this article is to draw attention to how this field of research allows us to think about the problem of the disparity on sentencing as a criminal justice operation pattern. This problem has been identified by many studies, but also by the social re- presentation of the criminal justice. From a literature review on sentencing and an analysis of the main stu- dies identified, this article proposes a new direction to understand the problem of disparity on sentencing in criminal justice and indicates a new subject to be explored as well as new empirical research possibili- ties on sentencing. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81 10.19092/reed.v2i2.81 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v2i2.81 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81/73 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 2 n. 2 (2015): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v2i2 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703031926784 |