Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Raupp, Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81
Resumo: This article aims to present an overview of inter- national and national empirical studies on senten- cing. We aim to show this field’s trajectory, its main discussions and findings as well as its “blind spots”. The main goal of this article is to draw attention to how this field of research allows us to think about the problem of the disparity on sentencing as a criminal justice operation pattern. This problem has been identified by many studies, but also by the social re- presentation of the criminal justice. From a literature review on sentencing and an analysis of the main stu- dies identified, this article proposes a new direction to understand the problem of disparity on sentencing in criminal justice and indicates a new subject to be explored as well as new empirical research possibili- ties on sentencing.
id RPED-1_915868659d053999fde5e25e3de2c49d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/81
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motivesAs pesquisas sobre o “sentencing”: disparidade, punição e vocabulários de motivosProdução decisóriadisparidadejustiça criminalpuniçãopositivismlegal sciencelegal discourselegal fieldSocial TheoryThis article aims to present an overview of inter- national and national empirical studies on senten- cing. We aim to show this field’s trajectory, its main discussions and findings as well as its “blind spots”. The main goal of this article is to draw attention to how this field of research allows us to think about the problem of the disparity on sentencing as a criminal justice operation pattern. This problem has been identified by many studies, but also by the social re- presentation of the criminal justice. From a literature review on sentencing and an analysis of the main stu- dies identified, this article proposes a new direction to understand the problem of disparity on sentencing in criminal justice and indicates a new subject to be explored as well as new empirical research possibili- ties on sentencing.O presente artigo propõe-se a traçar um panorama das pesquisas empíricas, estrangeiras e nacionais, so- bre o processo de determinação da pena pela justiça criminal, o “sentencing”. Apontamos a trajetória des- se campo, suas principais conclusões, bem como os pontos cegos de tais estudos. O objetivo é descrever os caminhos desse conjunto de pesquisas de modo a mostrar como os mesmos nos possibilitam refletir sobre a problemática do padrão de funcionamento desigual da justiça criminal apontado não somente por muitos estudos, mas também pelo imaginário so- cial sobre a justiça criminal. A partir do levantamento da literatura sobre o tema, bem como da análise dos principais trabalhos apontados, propomos uma re- qualificação do problema da disparidade das senten- ças criminais, bem como indicamos um novo objeto a ser explorado e, assim, para novas possibilidades de pesquisa empírica sobre o sentencing.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2015-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/8110.19092/reed.v2i2.81Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 2 n. 2 (2015): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v2i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81/73Raupp, Marianainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:24:28Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/81Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:24:28Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
As pesquisas sobre o “sentencing”: disparidade, punição e vocabulários de motivos
title Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
spellingShingle Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
Raupp, Mariana
Produção decisória
disparidade
justiça criminal
punição
positivism
legal science
legal discourse
legal field
Social Theory
title_short Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
title_full Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
title_fullStr Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
title_full_unstemmed Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
title_sort Research on sentencing: disparity, punishment and vocabularies of motives
author Raupp, Mariana
author_facet Raupp, Mariana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Raupp, Mariana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Produção decisória
disparidade
justiça criminal
punição
positivism
legal science
legal discourse
legal field
Social Theory
topic Produção decisória
disparidade
justiça criminal
punição
positivism
legal science
legal discourse
legal field
Social Theory
description This article aims to present an overview of inter- national and national empirical studies on senten- cing. We aim to show this field’s trajectory, its main discussions and findings as well as its “blind spots”. The main goal of this article is to draw attention to how this field of research allows us to think about the problem of the disparity on sentencing as a criminal justice operation pattern. This problem has been identified by many studies, but also by the social re- presentation of the criminal justice. From a literature review on sentencing and an analysis of the main stu- dies identified, this article proposes a new direction to understand the problem of disparity on sentencing in criminal justice and indicates a new subject to be explored as well as new empirical research possibili- ties on sentencing.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81
10.19092/reed.v2i2.81
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v2i2.81
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/81/73
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2015): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 2 n. 2 (2015): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v2i2
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703031926784