Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/130 |
Resumo: | This paper explores the connections between the most recent divorce-related law change, the Constitutional Amendment n.66 (CA66), and its impacts on individual decisions in this regard in Brazil, while analyzing how immediate the behavioral repercussions are for this type of law change and how judicial separation is affected by the fact that it is no longer a prerequisite for divorce. We have found that divorce and marriage rates increased significantly while separations decreased, showing that the law was strongly effective in less than 6 months and that judicial separation seemed to be chosen almost exclusively because of its status as an obligation. |
id |
RPED-1_e180289315858deb0f1ac29e814ae52a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/130 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial SeparationImpactos da Mudança na Lei do Divórcio no Brasil e a “Extinção” da Separação Judicialdivorcejudicial separationimpact evaluationdivórcioseparação judicialavaliação de impactoThis paper explores the connections between the most recent divorce-related law change, the Constitutional Amendment n.66 (CA66), and its impacts on individual decisions in this regard in Brazil, while analyzing how immediate the behavioral repercussions are for this type of law change and how judicial separation is affected by the fact that it is no longer a prerequisite for divorce. We have found that divorce and marriage rates increased significantly while separations decreased, showing that the law was strongly effective in less than 6 months and that judicial separation seemed to be chosen almost exclusively because of its status as an obligation.Este trabalho explora as conexões entre a mais recente mudança legislativa referente ao divórcio – a Emenda Constitucional n.66 – e seus impactos nas decisões individuais a esse respeito. Para tanto, analisa-se, por um lado, quão imediata são as repercussões comportamentais para esse tipo de mudança legislativa e, por outro, como a separação judicial é afetada pelo fato que ela não mais é um pré-requisito para o divórcio. Os resultados mostram que as taxas de divórcio e de casamento aumentaram significativamente, enquanto a separação judicial decresceu. Isso mostra que a lei foi bastante efetiva em menos de seis meses e que a separação judicial parecia ser utilizada quase que exclusivamente por seu status de obrigatória.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/13010.19092/reed.v3i2.130Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 3 n. 2 (2016): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v3i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDenghttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/130/116J. Maristrello Porto, AntônioH. Butelli, PedroH. Butelli, Pedroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:31:18Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/130Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:31:18Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation Impactos da Mudança na Lei do Divórcio no Brasil e a “Extinção” da Separação Judicial |
title |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation |
spellingShingle |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation J. Maristrello Porto, Antônio divorce judicial separation impact evaluation divórcio separação judicial avaliação de impacto |
title_short |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation |
title_full |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation |
title_fullStr |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation |
title_sort |
Impacts Of Divorce Law Changes In Brazil And The “Extinction” Of Judicial Separation |
author |
J. Maristrello Porto, Antônio |
author_facet |
J. Maristrello Porto, Antônio H. Butelli, Pedro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
H. Butelli, Pedro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
J. Maristrello Porto, Antônio H. Butelli, Pedro H. Butelli, Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
divorce judicial separation impact evaluation divórcio separação judicial avaliação de impacto |
topic |
divorce judicial separation impact evaluation divórcio separação judicial avaliação de impacto |
description |
This paper explores the connections between the most recent divorce-related law change, the Constitutional Amendment n.66 (CA66), and its impacts on individual decisions in this regard in Brazil, while analyzing how immediate the behavioral repercussions are for this type of law change and how judicial separation is affected by the fact that it is no longer a prerequisite for divorce. We have found that divorce and marriage rates increased significantly while separations decreased, showing that the law was strongly effective in less than 6 months and that judicial separation seemed to be chosen almost exclusively because of its status as an obligation. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/130 10.19092/reed.v3i2.130 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/130 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v3i2.130 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/130/116 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 3 n. 2 (2016): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v3i2 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703079112704 |