INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Miranda,Raffaello de Freitas, Pinheiro,Romulo Pedroza, Shimano,Antonio Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100051
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the insertion torque and the pulling force of each screw with different diameters and tap. Methods: Polyurethane blocks with a pilot hole of 2.7 mm were used in the study. An experimental group with 5 blocks was formed, the insertion torque was evaluated with a torque meter, and the pullout strength of each Globus screw of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm was assessed. Results: The comparison of the insertion torque on the 5.5 mm screws with pilot hole without tapping and with a smaller diameter than that of the screw (4.5 mm) and a different thread, and with the tapping with the same diameter as that of the screw (5.5 mm) and equal or different thread presented a statistical difference with a higher value of the insertion torque in the group in which the tapping was not performed. As for the pulling force of the 5.5 mm screw, the non-tapping of the pilot hole resulted in statistical difference with the same diameter of the screw (5.5 mm) and with a different thread of the screw. The pullout force on the 6.5 mm screw was higher in the group where the pilot hole was not tapped according to the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance level of p <0.05 in the comparison of the groups. Conclusions: Pilot hole tapping reduced insertion torque and pullout resistance of the pedicle screw influencing the fixation with tapping with the same screw diameter and different thread design.
id SBCO-1_0941d3ce4baa6b63f75e0db8aec84bc4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512019000100051
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWSSpineBone screwsSpinal fusionABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the insertion torque and the pulling force of each screw with different diameters and tap. Methods: Polyurethane blocks with a pilot hole of 2.7 mm were used in the study. An experimental group with 5 blocks was formed, the insertion torque was evaluated with a torque meter, and the pullout strength of each Globus screw of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm was assessed. Results: The comparison of the insertion torque on the 5.5 mm screws with pilot hole without tapping and with a smaller diameter than that of the screw (4.5 mm) and a different thread, and with the tapping with the same diameter as that of the screw (5.5 mm) and equal or different thread presented a statistical difference with a higher value of the insertion torque in the group in which the tapping was not performed. As for the pulling force of the 5.5 mm screw, the non-tapping of the pilot hole resulted in statistical difference with the same diameter of the screw (5.5 mm) and with a different thread of the screw. The pullout force on the 6.5 mm screw was higher in the group where the pilot hole was not tapped according to the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance level of p <0.05 in the comparison of the groups. Conclusions: Pilot hole tapping reduced insertion torque and pullout resistance of the pedicle screw influencing the fixation with tapping with the same screw diameter and different thread design.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100051Coluna/Columna v.18 n.1 2019reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120191801195390info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDefino,Helton Luiz AparecidoMiranda,Raffaello de FreitasPinheiro,Romulo PedrozaShimano,Antonio Carloseng2019-02-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512019000100051Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2019-02-19T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
title INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
spellingShingle INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido
Spine
Bone screws
Spinal fusion
title_short INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
title_full INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
title_fullStr INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
title_full_unstemmed INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
title_sort INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS
author Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido
author_facet Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido
Miranda,Raffaello de Freitas
Pinheiro,Romulo Pedroza
Shimano,Antonio Carlos
author_role author
author2 Miranda,Raffaello de Freitas
Pinheiro,Romulo Pedroza
Shimano,Antonio Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Defino,Helton Luiz Aparecido
Miranda,Raffaello de Freitas
Pinheiro,Romulo Pedroza
Shimano,Antonio Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spine
Bone screws
Spinal fusion
topic Spine
Bone screws
Spinal fusion
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the insertion torque and the pulling force of each screw with different diameters and tap. Methods: Polyurethane blocks with a pilot hole of 2.7 mm were used in the study. An experimental group with 5 blocks was formed, the insertion torque was evaluated with a torque meter, and the pullout strength of each Globus screw of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm was assessed. Results: The comparison of the insertion torque on the 5.5 mm screws with pilot hole without tapping and with a smaller diameter than that of the screw (4.5 mm) and a different thread, and with the tapping with the same diameter as that of the screw (5.5 mm) and equal or different thread presented a statistical difference with a higher value of the insertion torque in the group in which the tapping was not performed. As for the pulling force of the 5.5 mm screw, the non-tapping of the pilot hole resulted in statistical difference with the same diameter of the screw (5.5 mm) and with a different thread of the screw. The pullout force on the 6.5 mm screw was higher in the group where the pilot hole was not tapped according to the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance level of p <0.05 in the comparison of the groups. Conclusions: Pilot hole tapping reduced insertion torque and pullout resistance of the pedicle screw influencing the fixation with tapping with the same screw diameter and different thread design.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100051
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512019000100051
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120191801195390
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.18 n.1 2019
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615981129728