Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated general rice appearance, color, aroma and taste by 43 non-trained judges, using a 7-point hedonic scale with extremes ranging from "really disliked" and "really liked." There were no significant differences between the analyzed samples of conventional rice and UR rice using Duo-Trio Test. Mean values from the Acceptance Test for the evaluated attributes (general appearance, color, aroma e taste) were 5.6 and 5.9, corresponding to "liked" and "really liked" according to the hedonic scale, respectively. The iron did not alter the sensory characteristics of the final product, and the iron-fortified rice was well accepted. |
id |
SBCTA-1_75e735b41dda8d3f19672c2659b91c59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-20612010000200034 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with ironricefortification with ironsensory evaluationThe objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated general rice appearance, color, aroma and taste by 43 non-trained judges, using a 7-point hedonic scale with extremes ranging from "really disliked" and "really liked." There were no significant differences between the analyzed samples of conventional rice and UR rice using Duo-Trio Test. Mean values from the Acceptance Test for the evaluated attributes (general appearance, color, aroma e taste) were 5.6 and 5.9, corresponding to "liked" and "really liked" according to the hedonic scale, respectively. The iron did not alter the sensory characteristics of the final product, and the iron-fortified rice was well accepted.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034Food Science and Technology v.30 n.2 2010reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612010000200034info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBeinner,Mark AnthonySoares,Anne Danieli NascimentoBarros,Ana Laura AntunesMonteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhãeseng2010-08-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612010000200034Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2010-08-05T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron |
title |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron |
spellingShingle |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron Beinner,Mark Anthony rice fortification with iron sensory evaluation |
title_short |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron |
title_full |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron |
title_fullStr |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron |
title_sort |
Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron |
author |
Beinner,Mark Anthony |
author_facet |
Beinner,Mark Anthony Soares,Anne Danieli Nascimento Barros,Ana Laura Antunes Monteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhães |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soares,Anne Danieli Nascimento Barros,Ana Laura Antunes Monteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhães |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Beinner,Mark Anthony Soares,Anne Danieli Nascimento Barros,Ana Laura Antunes Monteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhães |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
rice fortification with iron sensory evaluation |
topic |
rice fortification with iron sensory evaluation |
description |
The objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated general rice appearance, color, aroma and taste by 43 non-trained judges, using a 7-point hedonic scale with extremes ranging from "really disliked" and "really liked." There were no significant differences between the analyzed samples of conventional rice and UR rice using Duo-Trio Test. Mean values from the Acceptance Test for the evaluated attributes (general appearance, color, aroma e taste) were 5.6 and 5.9, corresponding to "liked" and "really liked" according to the hedonic scale, respectively. The iron did not alter the sensory characteristics of the final product, and the iron-fortified rice was well accepted. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0101-20612010000200034 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology v.30 n.2 2010 reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) instacron:SBCTA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
instacron_str |
SBCTA |
institution |
SBCTA |
reponame_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
collection |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@sbcta.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126315588222976 |