Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Beinner,Mark Anthony
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Soares,Anne Danieli Nascimento, Barros,Ana Laura Antunes, Monteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhães
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034
Resumo: The objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated general rice appearance, color, aroma and taste by 43 non-trained judges, using a 7-point hedonic scale with extremes ranging from "really disliked" and "really liked." There were no significant differences between the analyzed samples of conventional rice and UR rice using Duo-Trio Test. Mean values from the Acceptance Test for the evaluated attributes (general appearance, color, aroma e taste) were 5.6 and 5.9, corresponding to "liked" and "really liked" according to the hedonic scale, respectively. The iron did not alter the sensory characteristics of the final product, and the iron-fortified rice was well accepted.
id SBCTA-1_75e735b41dda8d3f19672c2659b91c59
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-20612010000200034
network_acronym_str SBCTA-1
network_name_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with ironricefortification with ironsensory evaluationThe objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated general rice appearance, color, aroma and taste by 43 non-trained judges, using a 7-point hedonic scale with extremes ranging from "really disliked" and "really liked." There were no significant differences between the analyzed samples of conventional rice and UR rice using Duo-Trio Test. Mean values from the Acceptance Test for the evaluated attributes (general appearance, color, aroma e taste) were 5.6 and 5.9, corresponding to "liked" and "really liked" according to the hedonic scale, respectively. The iron did not alter the sensory characteristics of the final product, and the iron-fortified rice was well accepted.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034Food Science and Technology v.30 n.2 2010reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612010000200034info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBeinner,Mark AnthonySoares,Anne Danieli NascimentoBarros,Ana Laura AntunesMonteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhãeseng2010-08-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612010000200034Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2010-08-05T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
title Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
spellingShingle Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
Beinner,Mark Anthony
rice
fortification with iron
sensory evaluation
title_short Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
title_full Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
title_fullStr Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
title_full_unstemmed Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
title_sort Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
author Beinner,Mark Anthony
author_facet Beinner,Mark Anthony
Soares,Anne Danieli Nascimento
Barros,Ana Laura Antunes
Monteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhães
author_role author
author2 Soares,Anne Danieli Nascimento
Barros,Ana Laura Antunes
Monteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhães
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beinner,Mark Anthony
Soares,Anne Danieli Nascimento
Barros,Ana Laura Antunes
Monteiro,Marlene Azevedo Magalhães
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv rice
fortification with iron
sensory evaluation
topic rice
fortification with iron
sensory evaluation
description The objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated general rice appearance, color, aroma and taste by 43 non-trained judges, using a 7-point hedonic scale with extremes ranging from "really disliked" and "really liked." There were no significant differences between the analyzed samples of conventional rice and UR rice using Duo-Trio Test. Mean values from the Acceptance Test for the evaluated attributes (general appearance, color, aroma e taste) were 5.6 and 5.9, corresponding to "liked" and "really liked" according to the hedonic scale, respectively. The iron did not alter the sensory characteristics of the final product, and the iron-fortified rice was well accepted.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-20612010000200034
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology v.30 n.2 2010
reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron:SBCTA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron_str SBCTA
institution SBCTA
reponame_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
collection Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@sbcta.org.br
_version_ 1752126315588222976