Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia Agrícola |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009 |
Resumo: | Diesel fuel is used widely in Brazil and worldwide. On the other hand, the growing environmental awareness leads to a greater demand for renewable energy resources. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the use of different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel and diesel in an ignition compression engine with direct injection fuel. The tests were performed on an electric eddy current dynamometer, using the blends B10, B50 and B100, with 10; 50 e 100% of biodiesel, respectively, in comparison to the commercial diesel B5, with 5% of biodiesel added to the fossil diesel. The engine performance was analyzed trough the tractor power take off (PTO) for each fuel, and the best results obtained for the power and the specific fuel consumption, respectively, were: B5 (44.62 kW; 234.87 g kW-1 h-1); B10 (44.73 kW; 233.78 g kW-1 h-1); B50 (44.11 kW; 250.40 g kW-1 h-1) e B100 (43.40 kW; 263.63 g kW-1 h-1). The best performance occurred with the use of B5 and B10 fuel, without significant differences between these blends. The B100 fuel showed significant differences compared to the other fuels. |
id |
SBEA-1_7212fa943f18d2adf491d5f0b3328b0e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69162011000500009 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEA-1 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodieseldynamometerpowerspecific consumptionDiesel fuel is used widely in Brazil and worldwide. On the other hand, the growing environmental awareness leads to a greater demand for renewable energy resources. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the use of different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel and diesel in an ignition compression engine with direct injection fuel. The tests were performed on an electric eddy current dynamometer, using the blends B10, B50 and B100, with 10; 50 e 100% of biodiesel, respectively, in comparison to the commercial diesel B5, with 5% of biodiesel added to the fossil diesel. The engine performance was analyzed trough the tractor power take off (PTO) for each fuel, and the best results obtained for the power and the specific fuel consumption, respectively, were: B5 (44.62 kW; 234.87 g kW-1 h-1); B10 (44.73 kW; 233.78 g kW-1 h-1); B50 (44.11 kW; 250.40 g kW-1 h-1) e B100 (43.40 kW; 263.63 g kW-1 h-1). The best performance occurred with the use of B5 and B10 fuel, without significant differences between these blends. The B100 fuel showed significant differences compared to the other fuels.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2011-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.5 2011reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/S0100-69162011000500009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNietiedt,Gustavo H.Schlosser,José F.Russini,AlexandreFrantz,Ulisses G.Ribas,Rodrigo L.eng2011-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162011000500009Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2011-11-17T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel |
title |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel |
spellingShingle |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel Nietiedt,Gustavo H. dynamometer power specific consumption |
title_short |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel |
title_full |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel |
title_fullStr |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel |
title_sort |
Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel |
author |
Nietiedt,Gustavo H. |
author_facet |
Nietiedt,Gustavo H. Schlosser,José F. Russini,Alexandre Frantz,Ulisses G. Ribas,Rodrigo L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schlosser,José F. Russini,Alexandre Frantz,Ulisses G. Ribas,Rodrigo L. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nietiedt,Gustavo H. Schlosser,José F. Russini,Alexandre Frantz,Ulisses G. Ribas,Rodrigo L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dynamometer power specific consumption |
topic |
dynamometer power specific consumption |
description |
Diesel fuel is used widely in Brazil and worldwide. On the other hand, the growing environmental awareness leads to a greater demand for renewable energy resources. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the use of different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel and diesel in an ignition compression engine with direct injection fuel. The tests were performed on an electric eddy current dynamometer, using the blends B10, B50 and B100, with 10; 50 e 100% of biodiesel, respectively, in comparison to the commercial diesel B5, with 5% of biodiesel added to the fossil diesel. The engine performance was analyzed trough the tractor power take off (PTO) for each fuel, and the best results obtained for the power and the specific fuel consumption, respectively, were: B5 (44.62 kW; 234.87 g kW-1 h-1); B10 (44.73 kW; 233.78 g kW-1 h-1); B50 (44.11 kW; 250.40 g kW-1 h-1) e B100 (43.40 kW; 263.63 g kW-1 h-1). The best performance occurred with the use of B5 and B10 fuel, without significant differences between these blends. The B100 fuel showed significant differences compared to the other fuels. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-69162011000500009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.5 2011 reponame:Engenharia Agrícola instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) instacron:SBEA |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
instacron_str |
SBEA |
institution |
SBEA |
reponame_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
collection |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126270624235520 |