Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nietiedt,Gustavo H.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Schlosser,José F., Russini,Alexandre, Frantz,Ulisses G., Ribas,Rodrigo L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009
Resumo: Diesel fuel is used widely in Brazil and worldwide. On the other hand, the growing environmental awareness leads to a greater demand for renewable energy resources. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the use of different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel and diesel in an ignition compression engine with direct injection fuel. The tests were performed on an electric eddy current dynamometer, using the blends B10, B50 and B100, with 10; 50 e 100% of biodiesel, respectively, in comparison to the commercial diesel B5, with 5% of biodiesel added to the fossil diesel. The engine performance was analyzed trough the tractor power take off (PTO) for each fuel, and the best results obtained for the power and the specific fuel consumption, respectively, were: B5 (44.62 kW; 234.87 g kW-1 h-1); B10 (44.73 kW; 233.78 g kW-1 h-1); B50 (44.11 kW; 250.40 g kW-1 h-1) e B100 (43.40 kW; 263.63 g kW-1 h-1). The best performance occurred with the use of B5 and B10 fuel, without significant differences between these blends. The B100 fuel showed significant differences compared to the other fuels.
id SBEA-1_7212fa943f18d2adf491d5f0b3328b0e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162011000500009
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodieseldynamometerpowerspecific consumptionDiesel fuel is used widely in Brazil and worldwide. On the other hand, the growing environmental awareness leads to a greater demand for renewable energy resources. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the use of different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel and diesel in an ignition compression engine with direct injection fuel. The tests were performed on an electric eddy current dynamometer, using the blends B10, B50 and B100, with 10; 50 e 100% of biodiesel, respectively, in comparison to the commercial diesel B5, with 5% of biodiesel added to the fossil diesel. The engine performance was analyzed trough the tractor power take off (PTO) for each fuel, and the best results obtained for the power and the specific fuel consumption, respectively, were: B5 (44.62 kW; 234.87 g kW-1 h-1); B10 (44.73 kW; 233.78 g kW-1 h-1); B50 (44.11 kW; 250.40 g kW-1 h-1) e B100 (43.40 kW; 263.63 g kW-1 h-1). The best performance occurred with the use of B5 and B10 fuel, without significant differences between these blends. The B100 fuel showed significant differences compared to the other fuels.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2011-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.5 2011reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/S0100-69162011000500009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNietiedt,Gustavo H.Schlosser,José F.Russini,AlexandreFrantz,Ulisses G.Ribas,Rodrigo L.eng2011-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162011000500009Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2011-11-17T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
title Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
spellingShingle Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
Nietiedt,Gustavo H.
dynamometer
power
specific consumption
title_short Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
title_full Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
title_fullStr Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
title_full_unstemmed Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
title_sort Perfomance evaluation of a direct injection engine using different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel
author Nietiedt,Gustavo H.
author_facet Nietiedt,Gustavo H.
Schlosser,José F.
Russini,Alexandre
Frantz,Ulisses G.
Ribas,Rodrigo L.
author_role author
author2 Schlosser,José F.
Russini,Alexandre
Frantz,Ulisses G.
Ribas,Rodrigo L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nietiedt,Gustavo H.
Schlosser,José F.
Russini,Alexandre
Frantz,Ulisses G.
Ribas,Rodrigo L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dynamometer
power
specific consumption
topic dynamometer
power
specific consumption
description Diesel fuel is used widely in Brazil and worldwide. On the other hand, the growing environmental awareness leads to a greater demand for renewable energy resources. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the use of different blends of soybean (Glycine max) methyl biodiesel and diesel in an ignition compression engine with direct injection fuel. The tests were performed on an electric eddy current dynamometer, using the blends B10, B50 and B100, with 10; 50 e 100% of biodiesel, respectively, in comparison to the commercial diesel B5, with 5% of biodiesel added to the fossil diesel. The engine performance was analyzed trough the tractor power take off (PTO) for each fuel, and the best results obtained for the power and the specific fuel consumption, respectively, were: B5 (44.62 kW; 234.87 g kW-1 h-1); B10 (44.73 kW; 233.78 g kW-1 h-1); B50 (44.11 kW; 250.40 g kW-1 h-1) e B100 (43.40 kW; 263.63 g kW-1 h-1). The best performance occurred with the use of B5 and B10 fuel, without significant differences between these blends. The B100 fuel showed significant differences compared to the other fuels.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000500009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-69162011000500009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.5 2011
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126270624235520